The agenda and back up materials are all available here – 20181211-agenda & materials


The agenda and back up materials are all available here – 20181211-agenda & materials


Comments Off on BoS 12/11/18
Posted in Select Board matters

My regular monthly select board office hours are at The Center on the first Friday of every month from 9:00 to 10:00 AM (this Friday).
Residents are welcome to stop by to talk in person about any town matters. Residents can also have coffee and see the Council on Aging in action (a vibrant organization with lots going on).
I can be reached via my cell phone at 508-359-9190 or my blog about Medfield matters, where any schedule changes will be posted.
Comments Off on Office hours Friday
Posted in Select Board matters
FROM HESSCO THIS AFTERNOON –
Dear Board of Selectmen,
As your Area Agency on Aging and Aging Services Access Point I wanted to share HESSCO’s latest reports. Attached please find the 2018 Annual Report for HESSCO and a Medfield-specific Community Impact Statement. We are making a new effort to ensure that our community leaders are aware of our efforts within their town. Please do not hesitate to reach out with any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Sheryl Leary
Director of Planning and Community Development
HESSCO
One Merchant Street
Sharon, MA 02067
781-784-4944 (TTY)
Fax: 781-784-4922



Comments Off on HESSCO ANNUAL REPORT
Posted in Select Board matters, Seniors
NB – Additions are in red type.
================================================
Board of Selectmen
Agenda November 27, 2018
6:00 PM Declare meeting open
6:00 PM Vote to go into Executive Session: Exemption #2: To conduct strategy session in preparation for negotiations with nonunion personnel: discussion of Town Administrator contract for new Town Administrator Kristine Trierweiler
7:00 PM Call to order
Disclosure of video recording
We want to take a moment of appreciation for our Troops serving in the Middle East and
around the world
Announcement: Medfield Lions Christmas Tree Sale; Colleen Sullivan to speak
Planning Board Public Hearing on Monday December 3 at 8:05 PM, Town Hall regarding proposed upper
Spring Street Overlay District and the rezoning of three parcels near Peter Kristof Way
Appointments
7:00 PM Public Hearing – Annual Tax Classification
Board of Assessors will provide relevant information regarding Medfield’s property
tax rate. Vote to approve the residential factor
7:15 PM Developer Robert Borelli to present relevant information to the Board of Selectmen
regarding application for the proposed affordable housing project at 96 Adams
Street, a LIP project
7:45 PM Resident Eve Potts to present update on Plastic Bag Reduction Initiative
Citizen Comment
Action Items
Selectmen are requested to vote to sign letter to Board of Assessors regarding their release of excess
Overlay Funds
Zoning Board of Appeals requests the Selectmen accept resignation of Charles Peck as a full member
and appoint him as an Associate Member and vote to appoint William McNiff and Michael Whitcher as
members of the ZBA
Director of Public Works Maurice Goulet requests Selectmen vote to sign following contracts:
. Padula Bros., Inc. Lancaster, MA in the amount of $72,289.25 to purchase John Deere Tractor
(capital item)
. Tri-County Contractors Supply, Inc. West Springfield, MA in the amount of $61,125.00 for the
purchase of a flail attachment system to be used with the John Deere tractor
. Environmental Partners Group, Quincy, MA for consulting services regarding unaccounted for water
assessment; fee amount not to exceed $43,100.00
. Environmental Partners Group, Quincy, MA for consulting services regarding water test pilot report;
fee amount not to exceed $19,260.00
. Design Consultants, Inc. Somerville, MA for storm water management; fee not to exceed $20,000
(contractor assists the Town for compliance with our storm water permit)
Selectmen are requested to vote to sign Verizon and Eversource Agreements pertaining to Street Light
Pole attachment
Board of Selectmen are requested to vote to sign Agreement with Medfield Permanent Firefighters
Union regarding vacation accrual
Selectmen are requested to vote to approve and to sign Town Administrator contract with Kristine
Trierweiler
Discussion Items
Continued discussion regarding Town Wide Master Plan; vote to adopt charter and appoint initial
members
Continued discussion regarding future space needs for Council on Aging and Parks and Recreation
Discussion of October 29, 2018 Special Town Meeting
Discuss draft municipal comment letter regarding proposed development, The Rosebay at Medfield
Discuss January 2019 Selectmen meeting schedule
Discussion regarding Pleasant Court water
Licenses and Permits (Consent Agenda)
MEMO requests the Selectmen vote to grant a parade permit for the Christmas Parade to be held
Saturday December 8, 2018. Selectmen are cordially invited to participate in the December 7 Tree
Lighting festivities and the Parade
Medfield Lions Club request permission to post signs promoting Christmas Tree sales at their new
location, American Legion Parking Lot (formal vote)
Town Administrator Update
Discuss Meals Tax distribution
Acceptance / and or Correction of Meeting Minutes for October 2 and 30, 2018
Review Board of Selectmen Action List
Selectmen Report
Informational
MAPC extends invitation to their November 30 breakfast meeting; discussion the future of the region
Notice from ZBA regarding Public Hearing Thursday December 13, 7PM regarding 41 Dale Street project
Planning Board hearing Monday January 7, 2019 8:05PM regarding proposed amendments to Zoning Bylaws
COMCAST announces TV Channel updates and price changes
Verizon announces FIOS TV programming change
Comments Off on Revised agenda for tonight
Posted in Select Board matters
I just responded to a great comment from Nic Scalfarotto, and since my general sense is that such comments and my replies are not likely seem by many, and sense Nic raised a big issue, I thought I would post both his comment and my reply here so more can see them.
Nic, I added a little more on as well.
========================================================
Nic Scalfarotto
Accepting that developing differential tax rates would not provide benefit to home owners because there is a small industrial base, a plan to address the lack of such a base needs to be developed and communicated to residents.
==============================================================
As a new selectman, my first search was for businesses that wanted to locate in town, and when that did not seem a likely result, I have turned to having a town policy of building housing that is revenue positive to the town.
We know that people want to live in town, but mainly not build businesses here. The can make tax money and reduce our current residents’ taxes by building the kind of housing that is more profitable, such as Old Village Square (42 units paying over $600K/year in taxes, with one school child the last time I heard) or the two Larkin brothers projects (Glover Place off North Street and Chapel Hill on Hospital Road, again, both with few school children).
See the analysis that Kathy McCabe, the consultant to the Medfield State Hospital Master Planning Committee, did of the potential taxes to the town from leasing the lot 3 land the town owns on Ice House Road to build 42 units of senior housing versus leasing to a commercial facility, and the town netted either more than double or more that triple the taxes from the residential use over the sports complex, depending on whether the housing was either 100% or 25% affordable, respectively. Those results were summarized in Steve Nolan’s 1/2/2018 memo to the Board of Selectmen available here –20180102-SN-Memo to MSHMPC re HinkleyIce House Road v2 – final sent to BoS and inserted below as well.
I think that many of the friendly 40B projects that we are currently allowing in order to be in safe harbor, will be revenue positive. Statistically, we are told that we will likely average about 1.5 school children per in single family houses, while we will likely average 0.15 school children per unit in multifamily housing. So multifamily housing may well be revenue positive for the town, even if not age restricted.
Additionally, the town is already mainly single family homes, so we really do not need any more single family homes options, while we do not have a sufficient variety of other housing opportunities for residents, especially for seniors. Current proposals in the pipeline will assist at filling in that gap:
8 units on North Street (two developments)
36 units on Dale Street
16 units on Adams Street, age restricted
42 units at the Rosebay, age restricted
56 units (from memory) at The Legion site
However, such diversification of the tax base can only accomplish so much with respect to reducing our individual tax bills. The other issue with which we need to deal is the town’s willing to spend, witness our vote at the last annual town meeting (ATM) to increase our tax bills by about 10%, over the objections of the Board of Selectmen and the Warrant Committee.
===============================================




The Board of Selectmen received the report below today from the Assessors for the tax classification hearing that will occur this evening as part of the select board meeting. Towns in Massachusetts are permitted to charge the commercial and industrial taxpayers property taxes at a rate up to 50% higher than the residential rate (called a split tax rate), but Medfield never has.
Medfield’s reality is that because so little of our tax base is other than residential, even if we were to opt for the 50% higher tax rate on commercial and industrial properties, while the commercial and industrial properties taxes would go up by a lot (50%), the home owner would see little change – scant benefit to homeowners, while strong fiscal policy discouragement for any commercial/industrial uses. For that reason Medfield has always kept a single tax rate. See a PDF of the analysis here – 20181127-Assessors-tax classification hearing analysis



Posted in Budgets, Financial, Select Board matters
Today I received these informational materials and the agenda for the Board of Selectmen meeting on November 27 – 20181127-agenda & materials


Comments Off on BoS 11/27
Posted in Select Board matters

This email yesterday from Sarah Raposa, Town Planner about the town’s draft letter to Department of Housing and Community Development about the Rosebay project –
=========================================================
TOWN OF MEDFIELD
Office of
BOARD OF SELECTMEN
TOWN HOUSE, 459 MAIN STREET
MEDFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS 02052-0315
November 27, 2018
Catherine Racer, Associate Director
Division of Housing and Development
Department of Housing and Community Development
100 Cambridge Street, Suite 300
Boston, Massachusetts 02114
RE: Chapter 40B Comprehensive Permit
| Project Name: | The Rosebay at Medfield |
| Location: | 30 Pound Street, Medfield, MA, 02502 |
| Number of Units: | 45 Units (45 affordable) |
| Subsidizing Agency: | DHCD |
| Applicant: | Newgate Housing LLC |
Dear Ms. Racer,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Project Eligibility Application under the Chapter 40B program, for a proposed Low Income Housing Tax Credit (“LIHTC”) development. The Rosebay at Medfield, a 45-unit senior housing rental development proposed by Newgate Housing LLC contains 37 one-bedroom units and 8 two-bedroom units as well as programming space for elder services. The project site, which is currently in partial use as a Medfield Housing Authority senior housing property (“Tilden Village”), which currently contains 60 units within six two-story buildings and is served by existing municipal infrastructure. As Tilden Village is not served by elevators and none of the upper-story units are accessible, and as the proposed development includes programming space for elder services, it is logical to locate new senior housing on the undeveloped two-acre portion of the site; particularly as there is very limited available land in Medfield that is served by public water and sewer – including most undeveloped Town-owned land and the former Medfield State Hospital Site; thereby presenting significant challenges to the provision of affordable housing on other Town-owned sites. In order to increase both the supply of affordable senior rental housing, and also handicap accessible housing, as well as to provide a modest number of two-bedroom units to accommodate households with authorized home care workers, and the inclusion of space for elder services, the site at 30 Pound Street is ideal given its proximate location to the Town Center, existing senior housing, and local services.
The Medfield Board of Selectmen has reviewed the application and is in support of the concept to construct affordable senior housing on this site; but has some reservations about the design and potential traffic impacts of the proposed building. Having recently completed a Housing Production Plan which underscored the need for more diverse housing units in terms of unit size, tenure, and cost, the Plan specifically identified both Tilden Village and the Town Center as a target area for affordable housing. The Town-led effort to allow further development at Tilden Village has been a partnership between the Board of the Selectmen, the Medfield Affordable Housing Trust, and the Medfield Housing Authority to develop and issue and RFP for this site, and then to select the most responsible proposer [Newgate LLC]. The applicant has worked with the Town to develop a development program to create additional senior housing. The building, which has not yet undergone local permitting, has generated concern from neighboring residents and within the Town government. Although the applicant states that much of the design issues could be worked out during the Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”) process, the Town would prefer the applicant to revise their design program prior to appearing before the ZBA as incomplete applications could potentially undermine concerted efforts on the Town’s part to make the plan review process as transparent as possible. The applicant’s permitting strategy to wait until after the commencement of a hearing at the ZBA could damage newly formed public trust and could lead to confusion and the spread of misinformation, which could be detrimental to an already sensitive proposal for much needed housing and add considerable time and acrimony to the process. Due to these factors, the Board of Selectmen may opt not to support this project unless the applicant changes approach and becomes more responsive to community concerns regarding design and traffic impacts, and consequently, they may recommend that the Zoning Board of Appeals deny this project, as is their right due to the Town’s position in Safe Harbor.
In addition to the Town’s efforts to improve public perception regarding affordable housing, the Town has made significant strides to increase the actual production of affordable housing opportunities within the Town. Since the completion of the Housing Production Plan, the Town has authorized the formation of an Affordable Housing Trust (“Trust”), passed a $1m bond to capitalize the Trust, and adopted an aggressive Inclusionary Zoning Bylaw at Annual Town Meeting in 2017. The Town has been involved in further planning efforts including the Trust’s completion of a Five-Year Action Plan and Strategy and a Master Plan for the State Hospital site, which features provisions for affordable housing opportunities. Since the adoption of the Housing Production Plan, the Town has met their targets to reach Safe Harbor by approving the following developments: Cushman House at 67 North Street (rental, 8 units, 2 affordable), 71 North Street (rental, 8 apartments, 2 affordable), Chapel Hill Landing (ownership, 49 units, 13 affordable), Hillside Village (rental, 16 apartments, 4 affordable), and is currently reviewing Medfield Green at 41 Dale Street (mixed tenure, 36 units, 27 SHI eligible units).
The Medfield Planning Board took the opportunity to comment on the proposal early in concept at their August 28, 2017 meeting and again at their September 17, 2018 meeting. The Planning Board is concerned about the design of the building; in particular with respect to the roofline and the massing. Although the school complex is a large institutional building, Tilden Village consists of modest two-story structures and the surrounding neighborhood contains single family homes. The Planning Board is concerned that the proposed building is not in keeping with the architectural vernacular of the area and would like to see more effort to appropriately mass the building so as to minimize impacts on neighboring properties. Medfield’s local design standards discourage long unbroken facades, and they should be avoided and broken up with recesses and projections, changes in materials, and complimentary landscaping; although these standards are not applicable to a development pursuant to Chapter 40B, they do offer insight as to what the Town might consider appropriate design. The Planning Board also requested a traffic report and recommended the Zoning Board of Appeals consider obtaining technical assistance for the design review of the proposed building.
A site visit with DHCD was conducted on November 6, 2018. During the site visit, the following issues were discussed:
Following the site visit, Town Officials have submitted the following comments:
TOWN ADMINISTRATOR
The Town Administrator is not supportive of this proposal. The Town Administrator believes that the proposed neighborhood has faced a lot of recent development, including the 2005 renovation of the Middle and High Schools (originally constructed in 1961), a recent multifamily conversion resulting in the preservation of the historic Cushman House and resulting in 8 units including two affordable handicap accessible units, and a proposed adjacent multifamily project, also resulting in an increase of 8 units including two affordable units for a total of 16 units within a half mile radius of the project site. Further, Pound Street is currently used as a commuter cut through which would be impacted by this project. The Town Administrator would prefer to focus development at the Former State Hospital Site.
BOARD OF HEALTH
Due to the project site’s location within the Aquifer Protection Zone [which covers much of the Town], the applicant is requested to infiltrate, at a minimum, the first one-inch of run-off from the site entire site, and that run off from impervious surfaces be treated to the highest regulatory standard prior to infiltration. The Board of Health believes this will help ensure that the Town can maintain a clean and adequate supply of drinking water to its citizens, including those who reside and/or work at this project site.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Although the Department of Public Works (DPW) anticipates that all drainage, water, and sewer utilities will be shown on future plans as the project progresses, there are still some concerns about other missing elements. The current plans do not address snow removal for the planned development. It is unclear if there will there be snow storage areas dedicated for winter operations or if the snow be removed from the site. DPW notes that if the snow is planned to be removed from the site, accommodations for larger removal equipment such as, loaders, trailer dumps or large blowers should be considered. Parking vehicles within the right-of-way while snow removal in the development takes place should not be entertained as the town enforces parking bans throughout the winter months. In addition, the applicant shows a driving lane and two parking spaces located within a 20’ wide drainage easement held by DPW. Further discussion between the applicant and DPW will be required regarding the easement. In addition, details for handicap accessibility should be shown for each of the sidewalk approaches to the main entrance driveway on Pound Street. Lastly, DPW notes that all permits should be obtained before any work has commenced for street opening, trenching, and water and sewer connections; and believes the applicant should satisfy concerns related to increased traffic.
COUNCIL ON AGING
The Council on Aging is supportive of this proposal but has some concerns about the appearance of the building, as well as the size and height.
MEDFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS
The Medfield School Department is concerned by how close the building and parking is to adjacent Middle and High School complex. Many students at both the middle school and high school walk to school, and use an existing path that runs through the site to access the school. Maintaining the safe pedestrian access through the site for students should be a priority. There is also concern that the current road on the school side will be used as an emergency egress into the property. The school property has consistent traffic from 7am -11 pm from Sunday-Saturday for the period of September – June, and could be impacted by this project. Finally, the School Department notes that part of the Housing Authority property is currently in use as a playground for the School’s daycare.
MEDFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT
The Medfield Police Department is supportive of this proposal, but would like to see more details related to site illumination and traffic impacts.
MEDFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT
The Medfield Fire Department would prefer the applicant use a lockbox at the gate for emergency egress in lieu of Opticon, a barcode scanning system.
RESIDENT COMMENTS
In addition to those comments by Town Officials, a number of neighbors and residents have also submitted comments on the proposed project. Most comments related to concerns related to the Aquifer Protection District, the appropriateness of the building, the design of the building, and traffic impacts; however, not all letters spoke in opposition and several residents did issue letters of support.
GENERAL COMMENTS
Finally, the Town has some concerns regarding the pro forma and the long-term financial viability of the project once the compliance period ends for tax credit recapture. The Town recognizes that there are real challenges with respect to finding income eligible tenants who can afford LIHTC rents without a rental subsidy. With no long-term rental subsidy or other known recapitalization plan, there is some concern as to what position this may put the Housing Authority in should they wish to regain control of the property upon the dissolution of the Limited Partnership Agreement in light of the need to also pay for maintenance and management expenses. The Town also notes that the fair market rents for 2019 have been issued and should be used in New Gate LLC’s pro forma calculations. Due to long-term funding challenges, the Town also recognizes that the affordable units in this development are smaller than those required by DHCD but believes this will assist with future affordability. As the project consists of three fully handicap accessible units and two hearing impaired accessible units, and the building is served by an elevator, the Town is satisfied that the units will provide significant housing opportunities for lower income senior households. Although DHCD has advised against the inclusion of two-bedroom units, the Town would like to see the two-bedroom units to remain so as to allow for the occupancy of an authorized home care worker and believes such units would provide a significant benefit the Town.
In consideration of the above comments, and those enclosed, it is our expectation that you will agree that the Rosebay at Medfield is eligible for funding by DHCD so they may proceed with applying for LIHTC credits.
Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions that you may have.
Sincerely,
Michael Marcucci, Chairman
Medfield Board of Selectmen
Comments Off on Current draft of town response
Posted in Affordable housing / 40B, Select Board matters
Draft minutes circulated by Evelyn on Friday –

Meeting Minutes
October 16, 2018
Chenery Meeting Room draft
Present: Selectmen Marcucci, Murby, Peterson; Town Administrator Sullivan; Assistant Town Administrator Trierweiler; Town Counsel Cerel; Administrative Assistant Clarke
Chairman Marcucci called the meeting to order at 7:08 PM and disclosed this meeting is being recorded. Selectmen observed a moment of appreciation for our Troops serving in the Middle East and around the world
Selectman Marcucci announced that at the conclusion of the meeting there will be an Executive Session for the purpose of discussing pending litigation regarding LCB, both DEP and Land Court cases and not resume in open session at conclusion of Executive Session
Appointments
Joint meeting of Board of Selectmen and School Committee to fill School Committee vacancy by special election pursuant to General Laws, Chapter 41, Section 11
Selectman Marcucci remarked that the procedure is to open the Special Election for nominations then close for procedural roll call vote; with four members of school committee and three Selectmen. School Committee Chair Ms. O’Shea Brooke nominated Meghan Glenn. Selectman Marcucci queried if there is no one else, nominations are closed. Resident Laurel Scotti raised her hand and said that she would like to nominate Dr. Meredith Chamberland. She was recognized and explained that she is a seven year resident; her career is in education; presently works in the Canton School system as guidance director and would like to be involved where I live. She is sorry not to have sent in a letter of interest, but only just read on Patch over the weekend about submitting letters but is coming forward tonight.
Meghan Glenn was recognized who remarked that she is a six year resident and has three children in the school system. She feels that she will make a positive addition to the school committee due to her degree in education. Presently raising her children, however, has been actively involved in many aspects of their education as outlined in her letter of interest. Selectman Peterson addressed Ms. Chamberland saying that as this is the first time hearing about you; please give some information about your background. She replied that she has two children, first grader and a fifth grader; has attended school committee meetings, has been involved in the site council at Memorial School and coached basketball. Lots of wonderful parts in our school system, but there are broken relationships that need to be repaired especially in the area of student services. I want to work collaboratively to mend those relationships. To disagree is a common thing but we need to focus on the kids. She attended the meetings regarding strategic planning that were very long and emotional. I want to give a voice to those issues. Mr. Peterson addressed Ms. Glenn for anything else she would like to add. She remarked that I want to do more as a school committee member. I welcome the opportunity to be on the school committee.
Selectman Murby said that as this election is to fill the vacancy until the March election will you consider running. Ms. Glenn answered yes I will run for re-election. Ms. Chamberland explained that she previously pulled papers, however, due to her husband’s illness did not pursue. Mr. Murby wanted to know how you found out about the vacancy; learned that Dr. Marsden sent an email to residents with school children about the vacancy. Resident Jerry Potts said that it is great to have a couple of people interested; however, it should have been more publicized. Resident Chris Potts said that at the September 4th committee meeting Tim Bonfatti announced he will resign at the next meeting but it was not on the agenda and school committee did not discuss. Mr. Marcucci said that the Town, not the schools could have done a better job making the vacancy known and he accepts that responsibility. He continued saying that the statue is not crystal clear on the process, however I think as we work on developing policies and procedures to help us do better. School Committee member Chris Morrison said that at that time he advocated for Tim Bonfatti to reconsider his resigning. I want to acknowledge Tim and his long dedicated service to the school committee and publicly thank him. Ms. Brooke apologized that the resignation and process was not on the agenda. On September 17th she had a conference call with Dr. Marsden and council for how to replace a school committee member wanting to get it right; thought there would be more letters of interest.
As Clerk for the Board of Selectmen, Mr. Murby called for a roll call vote: School Committee members Christopher Morrison, Anna Mae O’Shea Brooke, Jessica Reilly, Leo Brehm all in favor of Meghan Glenn. Selectmen Marcucci and Peterson voted for Ms. Glenn; Mr. Murby cast his vote for Ms. Chamberland. Selectmen extended congratulations to Meghan Glenn.
Medfield Energy Committee
Chair Lee Alinsky requested his appointment with the Selectmen be cancelled
Cyclocross Racing
Ms. Trierweiler reported to the Selectmen that the hospital building and grounds committee met and is in favor of the event and agrees that race will not be on state property or on the overlook. She learned that the date cannot be changed; event will be on December 8. The fee for use of the property will be $2,000.00, two police details will be on site, one for parking and one for site management. Discussion ensued regarding the serving of liquor and Selectmen agree liquor may be served beginning at noon.
Vote: On a motion made and seconded it was voted unanimously to approve license
agreement for the use of the Medfield State Hospital property for the Cyclocross Race on
December 7, 8, 9, 2018 and grant an entertainment license to authorize tailgating after
noon time, subject to conditions contained in the agreement
Action Items
Medfield Police Grant
Vote: Selectman Murby made a motion seconded by Selectman Peterson to authorize
Town Administrator Sullivan to sign Application for Local Law Enforcement Equipment
Equipment and Technology Grant. Motion carried
Monthly Contribution Rates for Medex 2
Vote: On a motion made by Selectman Murby seconded by Selectman Peterson it was
voted unanimously to authorize Town Administrator Sullivan to sign the Acceptance of
Rates for the Medex 2 Renewal Proposal for the term beginning January 1, 2019 to
December 31, 2019
Hazard Mitigation Plan Contract
Vote: On a motion made and seconded it was voted unanimously to authorize Selectman
Marcucci to sign the Town’s Hazard Mitigation Plan contract
Special Town Meeting Articles
Selectman Marcucci recognized resident and Warrant Committee member Sharon Tatro. Ms. Tatro has done extensive research on Articles 1 and 2 regarding reducing speed limits on roadways in thickly settled or business district to 25 mph and establishing a 20 mph limit in designated safety zones. Ms. Tatro remarked that the recently established Municipal Modernization Act designates these speed limits; however MASS DOT is not in favor. She said that there are well over 250 pages of research on the matter and recommends the Selectmen consider dismissal. Selectmen thanked Ms. Tatro for her time doing the research.
Vote: On a motion made and seconded it was voted unanimously to:
Articles 1 and 2 recommend dismissal
Article 3 move to recommend passage
Article 4 move to recommend passage
Articles 5, 6 and 7 move to recommend passage. Noted Selectman Peterson recused
from vote on Article 7
Articles 8, 9 10 and 11 move to recommend passage
Licenses and Permits (Consent Agenda)
Granted as noted by the Chair:
First Parish Church a one-day wine and malt beverage permit for October 19 and 20, 2018
Kathy & Abe Schickel permission to hold the 6th Annual run Like A Maverick 5K on May 5, 2019
Transfer Station & Recycling Committee permission to post signs promoting October is Green
Month in Medfield
COA permission to place signs promoting October 26 Halloween Concert
Medfield Youth Lacrosse two week extension on sign posting to October 31, 2018
Angel Run committee permission to post signs promoting registration
Plastic Bag Reduction Initiative Group permission to post signs promoting public forums on
November 15 and 18 at Public Safety Building
Medfield Food Cupboard permission to post signs October 30 to November 6 promoting
Vote and Donate on November 6
Jack’s Abby Brewing a one-day wine and malt beverage permit for October 25 event at
Rocky Woods, Brew Moon Hike
Pending
Place on next meeting agenda, vote on Town Goals and Selectmen Action List vote; potential guidance to Parks and Recreation and Council on Aging
Acceptance and / or correction of Meeting Minutes
Vote: On a motion made and seconded it was voted unanimously to approve the minutes
of April 12 and 24, August 14 as submitted and September 18, 2018 minutes as amended
Selectmen Report
Mr. Peterson attended the legislative breakfast in Framingham put on by MMA; a good turnout. Needham Selectman Dan Matthews reported he requested additional funds from the state that is going nowhere.
Mr. Murby remarked that the RFI has been mailed to developers; now we wait for responses
He reported OPEB Trust Fund Committee met today. He distributed a printout of the trust fund status that indicates as of 6/30/18 is $2.889,000. Town has experienced a good return with putting in $400,000 per year; balance as of 8/31 is $3,340,000.
Mr. Marcucci had no report
Executive Session
Board of Selectmen voted to go into Executive Session at 9:00 PM for discussion of pending litigation regarding LCB, both DEP and Land Court cases as having the discussion in open session would have a detrimental effect on the Town’s position. Selectman Murby called for a roll call vote:
Selectman Peterson—yes
Selectman Marcucci—yes
Selectman Murby–yes
Comments Off on BoS 10/18
Posted in Select Board matters
Comments Off on BoS on 11/6
Posted in Select Board matters