Parents more influential than schools on substance abuse

This from the Medfield Youth Outreach office –

A new study concludes that parental involvement is more important than the school environment in preventing or limiting children’s use of alcohol or marijuana.

Researchers evaluated data from more than 10,000 students, parents, teachers and school administrators. They looked at “family social capital”—bonds between parents and children—as well as “school social capital”—a school’s ability to provide a positive environment for learning, Science Daily<http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/12/121204145553.htm> reports.

Measures of family social capital include trust, open communication and active engagement in a child’s life, while school social capital includes student involvement in extracurricular activities, teacher morale and the teachers’ ability to address student needs.

“Parents play an important role in shaping the decisions their children make when it comes to alcohol and marijuana,” study co-author Dr. Toby Parcel of North Carolina State University said in a news release<http://news.ncsu.edu/releases/wms-parcel-alcohol/>. “To be clear, school programs that address alcohol and marijuana use are definitely valuable, but the bonds parents form with their children are more important. Ideally, we can have both.”

The researchers found students with high levels of family social capital and low school social capital levels were less likely to have used either marijuana or alcohol, or to have used them less frequently, compared with students with high levels of school social capital and low family social capital.

The study appears in Journal of Drug Issues<http://jod.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/11/08/0022042612462220>.

Medfield Youth Outreach
459 Main St.
Medfield, MA 02052
508-359-7121

Light a candle Sunday at 7PM for children who died

This request from Annie and David Domeshek –
Sunday, December 9th, is the night set aside to light a candle all over the world for children who have died.  Unfortunately, the list of children we light for has grown every year.  Please light a candle, for one hour, for Natasha  and all the others, at 7:00 p.m. this Sunday night.  It goes around the world so that for 24 hours they will all see our lights.
As the Compassionate Friends newsletter says, “It takes only you and one candle to join hearts with the world.”
Gratefully,
Annie and David

ZBA approved Gatehouse’s 40B by 2-1

This afternoon the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Medfield voted to approve the Gatehouse application for its 40B project on West Street by a 2-1 vote.  Zoning Board of Appeals chair Bob Sylvia was the dissenting vote, and reportedly resigned from the ZBA after the vote. Bob had served on the ZBA and been its chair for forty years.

Bob Sylvia was arguing for an approval for sixty units.  However, the town’s legal consultant for the Gatehouse application, Mark Bobrowski, and the town counsel, Mark Cerel, both opined that such a large reduction in the number of approved units would allow Gatehouse to easily have the ZBA  decision reversed by the state Housing Appeals Committee (HAC) as a constructive denial. 

Mark Bobrowski had been earlier tasked by the ZBA to write a draft decision, including what concessions he thought legally achievable and appropriate.  Bob Sylvia disagreed with that draft, and he then recently undertook to author his own alternative version of an approval decision. 

The Zoning Board of Appeals faced a Hobson’s choice, per the counsel it got from Mark Cerel and Mark Bobrowski.  The classic legal advice is that the ZBA has to approve such a 40B application, but with reasonable conditions, if it hopes to survive a developer’s appeals of its decision to the HAC.  The strategy for the ZBA is to know just how far they can push the concessions in their decision, and still have the decision upheld by the HAC.  The ZBA’s disagreement today was apparently over just how far out the ZBA decision could successfully push that line, and skilled attorneys disagreed over where that line could safely to be drawn for Medfield. 

Of the other ZBA members, Russ Hallisey is an attorney who deals with real estate issues, and Charlie Peck is a banker.

It is too bad that a professional disagreement amongst attorneys resulted in the resignation of Bob Sylvia, an attorney who has successfully volunteered for and lead the ZBA for forty years.  I served for ten years on the ZBA with Bob, and have great respect and admiration for his leadership of that body that I witnessed.

See Patch article.

DOR certifies tax rate

From: dor.state.ma.us
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 9:10 AM
To:
Subject:  Tax Rate Approval Notification

Massachusetts Department of Revenue Division of Local Services
Amy Pitter, Commissioner
Robert G. Nunes, Deputy Commissioner & Director of Municipal Affairs

Medfield Assessors                Date: 12/6/2012 9:09:08 AM

Dear Assessors:

The Fiscal Year 2013 tax rate has been certified by the Bureau of Accounts for Medfield.

The four pages of the tax rate recapitulation form and the levy limit worksheet (not applicable to districts) are available on the Division of Local Services website:

Tax Rate Recapitulation Form

Levy Limit Worksheet

Page one of the tax rate recapitulation form includes the Director of Accounts’ electronic signature and the date of approval. This letter is your notification of approval pursuant
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 59, section 23. Please forward copies of this notification to other officials as you deem appropriate.

We wish to thank you for your cooperation and assistance in the tax rate setting process.

Sincerely,
Gerard D. Perry
Director of Accounts

MMA on state budget changes

The Massachusetts Municipal Association sent out this information in an email alert about the state budget cuts –

GOVERNOR CITES $540M STATE BUDGET SHORTFALL IN FY 2013

• Gov. Implements $225M in Program Cuts Using His 9C Budget Powers

• Reduces Municipal and Education Accounts by $28.75M

• Gov. Files Bill With Legislature to Cut Unrestricted Local Aid by $9M

Earlier this afternoon, Governor Deval Patrick announced that the state is facing a $540 million shortfall in its fiscal 2013 budget, and he unveiled a plan to close the budget gap this year.  He announced that he is using his “9C” emergency budget powers to implement $225 million in immediate cuts to state-funded programs in executive agencies under his control, and he proposed legislation to expand his 9C authority so that he can cut $9 million, or 1%, from Unrestricted General Government Aid, as well as 1% cuts to the judiciary, constitutional offices, and the Legislature.  His plan would also withdraw $200 million from the state’s rainy day fund.

Click HERE to link to the A&F website that contains the Governor’s announcement, his budget reductions, and his legislation.

$28.75 MILLION IN IMMEDIATE CUTS TO KEY SCHOOL AND MUNICIPAL PROGRAMS

Using his existing authority to declare a fiscal emergency and reduce executive branch spending, generally referred to as 9C powers, the Governor has unilaterally reduced funding for state agency accounts under his control by $225 million.  Many of these cuts will be painful for cities, towns and school districts.  The MMA has identified the local government accounts impacted the most, listed in order of the size of the mid-year budget cut:

• $11.5 million from the Special Education Circuit Breaker program  (a 4.8% cut)

• $6 million from Municipal Regionalization and Efficiencies Incentive Grants (a 41.2% cut)

• $5.25 million from the McKinney-Vento homeless student transportation account (a 46.5% cut)

• $2.5 million from the Chapter 70 “Pothole” account (a 71.4% cut)

• $1.3 million from Veterans’ Benefits reimbursements (a 2.9% cut)

• $1 million from Regional School Transportation (a 2.2% cut)

• $1 million from Charter School Reimbursements (a 1.4% cut)

• $83 thousand from School-Based Health Programs (a 0.7% cut)

• $68 thousand from Universal Pre-Kindergarten (a 0.9% cut)

• $45 thousand from the Municipal Police Training Committee (a 1.8% cut)

• In addition, a shortfall in sales tax collections will reduce the total sales tax revenue amount that flows to the School Building Assistance program by $20 million, which A&F officials say should not impact planned projects (we recommend contacting SBA if you have a project pending to receive an update on the status of your project and make sure there is no impact).

ASK YOUR LEGISLATORS TO OPPOSE THE GOVERNOR’S LEGISLATION TO IMPOSE A $9 MILLION MID-YEAR CUT TO UNRESTRICTED GENERAL GOVERNMENT AID

In a move that surprised the Legislature and local officials, the Governor has filed legislation requesting expanded 9C powers to reduce non-executive agencies by 1%.  This includes a proposal to have the Legislature approve a 1% cut in Unrestricted General Government Aid (UGGA) for every city and town, for a mid-year reduction of $9 million.  The Governor’s bill includes language saying that any unexpected increases in Lottery profits would go to cities and towns before the end of the year, potentially offsetting a portion of the cut, but this is no guarantee and, given the economy, very unlikely.  The MMA will strongly oppose any cut to unrestricted municipal aid, because that would destabilize local budgets in the middle of the fiscal year, and force reductions in community services.  Unrestricted municipal aid has already been cut 32%, or $416 million below original fiscal 2009 levels, and any additional cuts will be painful for cities and towns across the state.

Please Call Your Representatives and Senators Today and Ask Them to Oppose the Governor’s $9 Million Cut to Municipal Aid.

Waste Management recycling barrels

If you use Waste Management for trash, I  recently learned that they  provides free wheeled barrels for recycling, which they will deliver to your home.  I got mine this week, and recommend it to all as being much easier to use to get things back and forth to the curb.  No more of the crashes I have experienced more than once by stacking the recycling tubs on top of the waste barrel to make it all in one trip.  Additionally, they are huge.  Call them at 800-972-4545 to get one.

Gov. cuts budgets & seeks power to reduce local aid

PATRICK CUTS SPENDING BY $225 MILLION, WILL SEEK POWER TO CUT LOCAL AID

By Michael Norton and Matt Murphy
STATE HOUSE NEWS SERVICE

STATE HOUSE, BOSTON, DEC. 4, 2012…..As part of a plan to address an estimated $540 million mid-year budget gap, Gov. Deval Patrick on Tuesday slashed spending by $225 million and asked the Legislature to allow him to unilaterally reduce unrestricted local aid to cities and towns by 1 percent.

Unrestricted local aid pays for local services, such as public safety budgets, and is delivered separately from state aid to fund local education spending, which is not targeted for cuts under Patrick’s plan.

“I don’t think this is draconian. Obviously every city and town worries about an impact on their local aid, but as I say this is relatively modest. We are spreading the pain as broadly as possible and sensible and we have a solution for closing that gap in unrestricted local aid if the Lottery continues to help,” Patrick said.

The spending cuts ordered by the governor will hit nursing homes, special education funding, school transportation for the homeless and reimbursement rates for hospitals that treat low-income patients.

Patrick is asking to trim local aid by $9 million, and said if Lottery revenue exceeds expectations the surplus would be used to restore the reduced funding at the end of the year.

Senate budget chief Stephen Brewer told the News Service Monday that he did not sense an appetite within the Legislature to grant the governor local aid-cutting powers. Lawmakers are scheduled to return to Beacon Hill in January, when the governor’s proposal will await their attention.

Patrick used his existing budget management powers to reduce $225 million in spending through so-called 9C cuts, a 1 percent reduction to the total state budget that will result in the defunding of 700 positions in state government and, according to the governor, affect services to the state’s “most vulnerable” residents.

Patrick is also calling for $200 million to be drawn from the state’s $1.65 billion rainy day account to plug holes and prevent deeper spending cuts amid a weak economic recovery.

Patrick called on Congress to address the “fiscal cliff” this year, blaming uncertainty over scheduled tax hikes and spending cuts for private sector angst about expanding and the future of the economy.

“By all accounts that uncertainty and the resulting slowdown in economic growth is the direct cause of our budget challenges. Economists agree that the fiscal cliff is keeping a tremendous amount of capital on the sidelines,” Patrick said.

Patrick said $300 million this fiscal year and $1 billion in the next fiscal year is at risk for state budget writers depending on the outcome of negotiations between President Obama and Congressional leaders. “The cost of inaction is immense,” he said.

The state budget is also facing significant and still unknown costs associated with an evidence tampering debacle that has forced public officials to revisit thousands of drug cases previously thought to be settled.

Spending on Medicaid, the state’s largest program, is a perennial concern and administration officials said they are on track to meet or exceed roughly $500 million anticipated savings in that program and $730 million in overall health care savings associated with Medicaid and other health insurance programs.

Though not as bad as past years during the depths of the recession, Patrick said the state’s budget problems are “serious” and could worsen depending on federal machinations.

After a disappointing month of tax collections in October opened a $256 million budget gap four months into the fiscal year, November revenues rebounded slightly and came in $21 million above projections, but still $235 million short for the year to date.

Under the cuts Patrick announced, no agencies will see budgets reduced below fiscal 2012 levels.

Administration and Finance Secretary Jay Gonzalez said administration officials now believe tax collections this fiscal year will total $515 million less than the administration and legislative budget writers assumed when they compiled this year’s $32.5 billion budget.

Gonzalez officially lowered the state’s expected tax take this year to $21.496 billion, and said he expects the state to collect $381 million more than in fiscal 2012 but $515 million less than estimates made last December and used to build the budget.

Gonzalez expects tax collections to slightly rebound over the final seven months of fiscal 2013.

Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation President Michael Widmer, who monitors budget developments on behalf of the business-backed group, said he agreed with Patrick’s revised state revenue estimate.

“The budget-cutting steps, while painful, are certainly necessary,” Widmer said.

Widmer identified the impact of the midyear budget problems on the fiscal 2014 budget as the “larger issue,” estimating about $800 million in onetime revenues in the fiscal 2013 budget won’t be available for fiscal 2014, which begins on July 1, 2013.

“That’s a huge hole the state faces for fiscal ’14,” Widmer said.

Roughly speaking, Widmer said, the state budget has been under pressure through three years associated with the recent recession and the last two years which have featured modest economic growth, with rainy day fund and federal stimulus law funds driven into the budget and coupled with major spending cuts.

“It is the longest period of fiscal pressures of this magnitude,” Widmer said. “The economic recovery has been so weak both nationally and here that we haven’t had much in the way of revenues. That’s the sad reality. This is now the fifth year.”

A $20 million salary reserve to provide raises to human service workers is not being reduced, Gonzalez said. “It is available to disburse to human service workers,” he said.

Patrick is also calling on leaders of the other two branches of government, the legislative and judiciary, to agree to 1 percent cuts to their own budgets for a savings of $25 million.

The current budget problems don’t require additional revenues, Patrick said, while suggesting his upcoming long-term transportation financing plan would feature new revenues.

The governor’s budget plan also defers $20 million in sales tax revenue that would have gone to the Massachusetts School Building Authority to the general fund, and makes cuts to budgeted hospital rate increases, special education and veteran benefit accounts.

Gonzalez said hospital rate increases for providers caring for certain MassHealth patients would be reduced by $52 million, a special education increase would be cut from $28 million to $17 million, and $1.3 million would be trimmed from veterans’ benefits due to decreased caseloads.

Municipal regionalization grants and budgeted increases in nursing home rates will also be decreased.

Gonzalez said the state has realized about $113 million in savings from lower than expected borrowing costs, of which $20 million will be used to offset the revenue gap. The supplemental budget to be filed by Patrick asking for 1 percent cuts in non-executive branches of government and local aid also proposes to spend the remaining $93 million from debt service savings on caseload driven accounts like homelessness.

Geoffrey Beckwith, executive director of the Massachusetts Municipal Association, said cuts to special education reimbursements, school transportation and local aid will impact municipal budgets mid-year and be difficult to address for cities and towns.

Noting cuts to local aid that have built up over several years, Beckwith said, “This is an additional cut of $9 million opening up question marks for every single community’s budget.” He said the MMA will ask the Legislature not to approve the cut in unrestricted local aid.

“They’ll have to take reductions in programs and services. The 1 percent sounds small but it will destabilize current budgets in place and have communities have to take action. They cannot wait,” Beckwith said.

For detailed information about the spending cuts, go to: http://www.mass.gov/anf/budget-taxes-and-procurement/state-budget/fy13-budget-info/fy13-budget-cut-information

END
12/04/2012

Energy Committee 10/25/12 minutes

Energy Committee Meeting Minutes

October 25, 2012, 7:30 P.M. Town Hall

Present: Marie Nolan, Cynthia Greene, Lee Alinsky, Fred Davis, Charles Kellner, David Temple, Osler Peterson, Michael Sullivan and David Cressman, guest.

Chairman Nolan called the meeting to order at 7:35 pm.

I. Accept minutes of last meeting – September 27, 2012 Minutes by Mike Sullivan were accepted.

II. Dartmouth Energy Efficiency/Renewable Energy Strategies Discussion with Town of Dartmouth Administrator

David Cressman, Town Administrator of Dartmouth, MA shared his experiences regarding that town’s successful renewable energy activities. He had previously been in Tewksbury. In Dartmouth, an energy committee was started around 2000 by his predecessor; the committee had significant engineering talent. The focus was wind, thinking it would provide biggest bang for buck. But around 3 yrs ago, it had become “a runaway locomotive”; they were looking at 80-100 meter turbines; that was too high, as it was in a flight path; also too close to wetlands, zoning issues, then financing. The reward looked ok, but with low confidence, only 50%, meaning high risk. At 80-90% confidence, the picture was much less rosy; plus noise concerns. Was heading for 8 MW. Switched from town-owned to a firm-owned project which would sell electricity to town. However, no wind developments ensued.

Switched focus to installing PV (photovoltaic) on capped landfill. Got town meeting approval to lease land for 20 years. By this point, there were many wind opponents who easily became solar proponents. Gave solar farm companies as-of-right in any zone in Town. Asked for RFPs, considered quality, experience, price.

Developments in the past 3 years:

  • 1.8MW ConEd [ConEdison Development] in industrial park; 20-acre parcel, 10-acre plant.
  • 2.6MW ConEd in residential Hicksville area, problems with residents, demanded special town meeting.
  • 1.3MW Borrego [Borrego Solar Systems] on Reed Rd. Sports field, abutting residential, no problems.
  • 1.4MW Borrego on landfill. Town agrees to buy back electricity at $.08 / KWH, no inflation for 20 years. Attorney General, according to 40A Sect 3, asked for consideration (?).
  • 6.2MW EMI [Energy Management Inc.], “Cape Wind company” at Energy Park, paying $.099 / KWH.
  • 3.4MW Borrego at High Hill.
  • 6.0MW No-Fossil [No Fossil Fuel] on Fisher Rd.

Electricity consumption for Dartmouth, municipal uses only, comes to 10MW. Town is buying this electricity, meaning for municipal uses, from the developers. Buying at $.08 / KWH, credit from Nstar for $.12 / KWH, therefore net $.04 / KWH cost (?). Developer sells (? or attempting to sell?) other production to area companies, after reaching capacity of sales to town. Developer is getting tax credits; making most of their money in the first 7 years, depreciation allowance. Town is also making money from leasing the land.

To do all this, Cresman highly recommends a specialist attorney. He successfully used Mark C. Kalpin, Partner, and Co-Chair of the Cleantech and Energy Group at WilmerHale, who “has a boutique business specializing in this.”

One concern is what if the support for net metering should shift? Either then would negotiate a new price, or could break the contract after paying the “terminal value.”

There is a market for Solar RECs [Solar Renewable Energy Certificate] – investments in solar projects The “Department of Energy Resources (DOER) has carved-out a portion of the RPS Class I Renewable Energy requirement to support distributed solar photovoltaic (PV) energy facilities, as provided by the Green Communities Act of 2008” – see their website for more info at:

http://www.mass.gov/eea/energy-utilities-clean-tech/renewable-energy/solar/rps-solar-carve-out/

Dartmouth insisted that developers pay taxes, not PILOT (payment in lieu of taxes).  The Town now reached capacity for distributed generation.  Currently projecting ~$7 million in electricity savings over 20 years from these photovoltaic projects (compare that previously they had been thinking about ~$3 million from wind).  Projects must have a 30-foot vegetative buffer, and a 75-foot setback. There have been a couple of MA towns like Falmouth who “also got out of control in wind.”

Discussion followed about possible application for Medfield. Pete asked are there 20-acre parcels in Medfield that could potentially be solar generation energy sites? Answers:

  • It will be maybe ~10 yrs until Medfield’s landfill is available.
  • There are about 40 acres available behind Wheelock.
  • The wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) is about 2.1 acres, already fenced in and remote (Marie: TGE can do a quick feasiblity assessment; Mike will talk with head of the WWTP). The price of land in Medfield is probably different because parts of Dartmouth are older strip-malls and dormant industrial areas. Medfield’s municipal electricity bill is $1.1 million / yr.

III. Report out on WWTP audit findings

Mike reported out on the results of the energy audit of the Wastewater Treatment Plant which was presented to the Selectmen and interested parties by NSTAR and its contractor Horizon Solutions on October 29, 2012.  The energy audit was a result of the town’s application to MA DOER for assistance with energy conservation strategies at the WWTP.

Mike reported that of all the 23 WWTP plants in the state, municipal and regional, that were audited, DOER concluded that Medfield’s was the most energy efficient! And we’re doing it all without state or federal subsidy or financing. Energy bill is ~$9000 / month. There is talk of new technology from Europe which might eventually allow the WWTP to be even more efficient.

IV. MEC follow-up to Town Charter and Bylaw Committee request

Marie wrote letter as discussed.

V. MEC/Medfield Green Winter Series on Energy Issues

  • First session: January 17 at Library, 7:00 – 8:30 pm on residential energy conservation and efficiency. Can Pasi from Sagewell come to explain infrared pictures to residents and next steps? Maybe NStar Green presentation? Consider explaining how to use kill-a-watt meters in a home? Marie will followup with Medfield Green.
  • Second session: February 28 at Library to focus on renewables, esp. individual homeowners’ experiences such as Chief of Police converting home to solar; Anna Mae O’Shea Brooke’s home conversion to  geothermal.
  • Third session: April 7 at Harmony Center to focus on electromagnetic emissions (EMFs) from technoloical advances (including smart meters) and how they affect us.  This program is being sponsored by Medfield Green and The Harmony Center.

VI. Sagewell Mass Thermal Imaging Initiative Update

David Temple wrote an article which was published in Medfield Press Friday October 12: “Utilizing Thermal Imaging Can Save You Energy, Cash: Time’s Running Out on Free Energy-Saving Programs.”

VII. Set Date and Agenda for next meeting

Thursday, November 29, 2012.

Minutes respectfully submitted by Fred Davis, thanks for help from Marie Nolan and Mike Sullivan.

Energy Committee 11/12/12 meeting minutes

Medfield Energy Committee
November 29, 2012 Meeting Minutes

Attending: Lee Alinsky, Fred Bunger, Cynthia Green, Marie Nolan,
Pete Peterson, Mike Sullivan, David Temple, Ryan McLaughlin

1. Minutes of October 25, 2012 meeting were approved.

2. Reviewed TGE analysis of Solar PV installations of 0.7 and 2.3
acres at Wastewater Treatment Plant. Both have same payout of
11.7 years based on assumed electricity cost of $.18/kWh and a
return of $.20/kWh from the sale of REC’s. The WWTP energy use
averages 58,000 kWh/month at an average cost of $9,313/month or energy cost of $.159/kWh. Marie will have the analysis updated
using current electricity pricing.

3. MEC is collaborating with Medfield Green on a Energy
Conservation and Alternative Energy series in January and February (possibly March). The first session is January 17. Speakers include Patsi Miettinen, Sagewell president, perhaps Next Step Living, Dan Ruben (energy use reduction speaker and Director of Boston Green Tourism), and residents who have implemented alternative energy projects on their homes such as Chief Meaney and Anna May O’Shea-Brooks. Marie will contact Medfield Green about the content of Dan Ruben’s talk.

4. DOER Clean Energy Grant Program Solicitation to help
communities with planning. Mike Sullivan will send a letter of intent to DOER regarding Medfield interest in solar PV at the wastewater
treatment plant.

5. As part of the solicitation for interest in the solar PV at the
wastewater treatment plant, MEC feels it would be useful for the
potential vendors to look at other Town property and buildings and
provide proposals where feasible.

6. A December holiday get-together is tentatively planned for
December 18 or 19 at Marie Nolan’s.

f. bunger 11/30/12

Warrant Committee seeks members

The town's moderator, Scott McDermott, said today that he is still looking to fill open positions on the Warrant Committee.  Contact him if you are willing to help the town vet its budgets for the upcoming budget season that ends with the town meeting on the last Monday in April.  The Warrant Committee tends to meet weekly at this time of year.