MSH purchase – emergency again

The emergency preamble to he Medfield State Hospital purchase legislation had mysteriously been removed within the past couple of weeks, and Rep. Denise Garlick reports that it has been put back in today.  The emergency preamble allows bills to take effect immediately upon signing by the Governor, as otherwise there is a 90 day waiting period before it becomes law.

I had emailed Rep. Garlick and Rep. Dooley yesterday, after being alerted by Bill Massaro to the change, to query why the emergency preamble had been removed.

Per email from Mike just now ==>

Representative Garlick just called to advise that the emergency preamble has been added back to the proposed legislation on the sale of the hospital property to the Town. she said that everything is moving along smoothly on that bill. Mike Sullivan

Clark Tavern appealed

Clark Tavern owner, Ms Linnert,  shared with me this evening that their ZBA approval to convert the former residence into a tavern has been appealed.  Generally, such appeals can delay the permit for about a year., until the court can conduct a trial.  The appeal rights are to either the Superior Court or the Land Court at the person’s option.

How GM was driven to safety

How GM was Drive to Safety
General Motors (GM) knew it would only take 57 cents to make its cars safer, but it chose to put profits over safety. GM was ultimately driven to safety by grieving parents and their attorney, who held GM accountable in the civil justice system.

But if GM had its way, the public would never have known about its deadly ignition switch scandal. For over a decade, GM used court secrecy clauses to hide its wrongdoing in order to keep its dangerous cars on the market and continue to profit while American lives were threatened.

Court secrecy endangers consumers and allows corporations to hide wrongdoing.

CLICK HERE to tell Congress to support the Sunshine in Litigation Act (S.2364 / H.R.4361) to keep corporations from hiding dangerous products and to motivate manufacturers to correct these hazards earlier instead of waiting until more deaths and injuries occur.

Tell Congress Americans have a right to know about hazardous and defective products! CLICK HERE to make your voice heard today!

logo-take-justice-back

777 6th Street NW, Suite 200 | Washington, DC 20001 | 202-965-3500

TTOR to town – bear it

The letter below from the Trustees of Reservations (TTOR) President and CEO tells Medfield residents that we have to just put up with more mosquitoes because TTOR has decided to not allow spraying on its properties.

Norfolk County Mosquito Control (NCMC) is telling the town that without the larvicide spraying early in the summer, that there will be no effective way to control the large numbers of mosquitoes that we can expect to get later in the summer if there is a flood and the many eggs hatch into mosquitoes.  NCMC also tells the town that teh larvicide they use is some sort of thing that acts only on the mosquito larva, and is bonded to corn I believe it is, so that there is really no risk.

Norfolk County Mosquito Control tried to have its scientists speak to the TTOR scientists, but that does not seem to have resolved things so as to allow spraying on TTOR lands.


Dear Medfield residents,

 

For those of you who frequent our local properties, Rocky Woods, Noon Hill, Rocky Narrows or others in the Charles River Valley area, you may know us and may even be a member.  For those of you not familiar with us, The Trustees of Reservations is the world’s first regional land trust and one of Massachusetts largest conservation organizations with over 113 properties spread across more than 26,000 acres statewide. Our mission is to “hold in trust” (preserve and protect) “reservations” (properties) of scenic, cultural and natural significance for public use and enjoyment.

 

Recently, we have received several requests from Medfield town officials to allow preventive mosquito control on The Trustees of Reservations’ Medfield properties. We have considered these requests seriously since the health and safety of our visitors is of utmost importance to us, as are the fragile ecosystems and wildlife habitats located on our many reservations. We acknowledge that mosquitos are a nuisance and that there may be health risks associated with them in certain areas of the state, including Medfield.

 

In our recent conversations with selectmen, public health officials, and county mosquito control agencies we discussed our decision to opt-out of the town’s chemically-based control measures.  This decision is guided by our own science-based mosquito control policy as well as the guidelines of the Mass Department of Public Health and the Norfolk County Mosquito Control District.  We understand that chemically-based measures may become important in the case of a public health emergency declared by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (DPH), and our policy supports this action should it be necessary.

 

In summary, we are concerned about the potential health risks associated with the mosquito population and will continue to be in dialogue with public health officials and review available data that might inform our policy going forward. We appreciate your patience and understanding as we evaluate next steps.

 

In the meantime, we hope you have a healthy, safe and active summer and remember to use necessary precautions and protective measures when enjoying our properties and being outdoors in general.  Outdoor places contribute to the overall quality of life in our communities and we remain committed to caring for our special places so that they are safe and enjoyable for everyone. For more information on upcoming area events, programs and fun family activities please visit: www.thetrustees.org.

Thank you,

 

Barbara Erickson

Trustees of Reservations President and CEO

Medfield budget online

I signed up for a webinar in two weeks on putting the town’s budget online.  This outfit would cost the town $7,000/year to do it.  Then everything is easily available  and everyone gets access.


OpenGov | 650.422.3642
Mountain View | Boulder
www.opengov.com @OpenGovInc
June 18, 2014 (3:50pm)

1.    Cost is based on size of town’s annual budget =
a.    Under $100m cost $7,000/year
b.    Below $50m is $4900/year

This was the email from OpenGov –

Osler,

Thank you for your time today, good speaking with you. Here is some additional information on OpenGov for your consideration. Enjoy the webinar, and I’ll follow up after for your feedback.

 
Over 100 local governments are using OpenGov to instantly access their financial information in beautiful, interactive charts and tables.

OpenGov is an affordable, web-based service that provides instant access to your financial and budget information with beautiful, interactive charts and tables.
 

Please have a look at New Haven’s new OpenGov site:

New Haven CT:  https://newhavenct.opengov.com

Local governments across the country use OpenGov for:

Financial Reporting – Communicate financial information more quickly and effectively. Instantly view and export charts and tables customized to your Chart of Accounts. 

Business Intelligence – Visualize trends and gain new insights that you can’t get from a spreadsheet or PDF. Bring your financial data to life!

Transparency – Give citizens self-service access to interactive financials and proposed budgets for a more informed, productive dialog.

OpenGov is easy to set up – there’s no installation and no integration.

Regards,
Owen Silver

Gatehouse’s 40B

Mike Sullivan reported at the Board of Selectmen meeting last night that Gatehouse, the developers of the 92 unit 40B apartment complex planned for West Street have been meeting with Town of Medfield officials about the preparatory details required for them to be able to start construction.  I understood that they had been meeting with Ken Feeney, Superintendent and John Naff, the Building Commissioner, and further that Gatehouse is expected to be breaking ground in July.

Major road repairs planned

Ken Feeney had given the selectmen the following data ahead of our meeting last night at my request for a list of what road repairs are currently planned by the DPW.  We also got the list of streets to be chip sealed, that I posted yesterday.

This list is a multi-year schedule of road repair plans, perhaps 2-3 from what Ken said last night.  Ken also shared that it costs the town $500,000 to asphalt 2 miles of highway, which is why he does the stone seal on side roads.

By way of correction, Hospital Road was on the list to be chip sealed from yesterday, but Ken said last night that was there only as a reminder to himself that it will be dug up and patched when the new water main is run from well 6 to the new water tower at the former MSH site.

This chart is about the length times the width of the street involved, and hence the amount of asphalt.


Roads L X W 2014
Rte 27 — total 2893 tons — 2″2″ overlay

High St, Spring St, Granite St – 19 Spring St   6888 x 30 = 2583 tons South St, 216 South St – High St                        825 x 30 = 310 tons

North Meadows — total 8719 tons

CVS to Dale St                                                         1740 x 45 = 978 tons

Dale St – West St                                                  2966 x 44 = 1631 tons

West St – Town Line                                             11,110 x 44 = 6110 tons
Main Street – total 6620 tons
Spring St – Millis line             3929 x 44 = 2160 tons

Brook St – Nebo                        6197 x 33 = 2556 tons

Nebo to town line                    3905 x 39 = 1904 tons
North Street – total 2560 tons

Harding St – town line              7584 x 27 = 2560 tons

School enrollment decline

From the DOE via the Boston Business Journal, via Charlie Glew –

School District    Medfield
Enrollment, 2013-2014    2,674

Enrollment, 2008-2009    3,004
5-year enrollment change    -11%

Enrollment, 2003-2004    3,047
10-year enrollment change    -12%

Enrollment, 1993-1994    2,116
20-year enrollment change    26%

Road work this summer

Ken Feeney reports that the following roads will get chip sealed this summer –

Adams – Cottage to Dale
Adams – West to West Mill
Bishop Lane
Bridge Street
Clayton Street
Copperwood Road
Cottage Street
Frairy Street
Mitchell Place
Mitchell Street
School Street
Upham Road
Vinald Road
Winter Street
CEMETERY

Plus Hospital Road after the water main is installed

MMA cell antennae alert

This today from the Massachusetts Municipal Association –


June 16, 2014

LOCAL ZONING THREATENED BY WIRELESS TELECOM INDUSTRY BILLS

BILLS WOULD STRIP CITIES AND TOWNS OF CONTROL OVER WIRELESS FACILITIES

HOUSE ADOPTS LAST-MINUTE INDUSTRY AMENDMENT IN ECON. DEV. BILL

SENATE BILL 2183 MOVES OUT OF COMMITTEE

PLEASE CALL YOUR SENATORS TODAY TO STOP THIS TAKE-OVER

The telecommunications industry is moving quickly to fast-track legislation to pre-empt virtually all municipal zoning or control over the siting of wireless antennas and equipment in Massachusetts.

These powerful companies are determined to pass a state law that would allow them to place wireless antennas and equipment on any building or structure in any location in any community, and override all zoning and any local provision or condition to protect neighborhoods and the public from unsightly and intrusive antennas.

The legislation has surfaced late in the session, and is advancing quickly through both the House and Senate. Local officials must contact their Senators and Representatives today to stop this effort to trample municipal control.

The Telecom Industry is Pursuing Two Routes

 • The Legislature’s Economic Development Bill. Last week, by a voice vote, House members attached this industry-written language to the House’s economic development bill (Sections 74 and 75 of H. 4181), which was passed by the House of Representatives and is now before the Senate. Senate leaders have pledged to propose their own economic development bill, and it is certain that the wireless telecommunications companies will attempt to attach the same language to override local control.

 • S. 2183 – “An Act Upgrading Mobile Broadband Coverage in the Commonwealth.” This stand-alone bill with language identical to Sections 74 and 75 of the House economic development bill has also been sent from the Committee on Telecommunications and Energy, and is now before the Senate Ways and Means Committee. The bill could advance at any moment.

Local officials must call their Senators immediately and tell them to oppose S. 2183 AND any attempt to pre-empt local control in the Senate’s economic development bill.

The Telecom Industry Bill Would Override All Local Decision-Making

S. 2183 and Sections 74 and 75 of the House economic development bill would allow telecommunications companies to “collocate” unlimited new antennas and equipment on any and all existing buildings and structures, regardless of the impact on neighborhoods or interference with public rights-of-ways.

The amendment would allow all wireless telecommunications companies to install or upgrade wireless antennas and equipment on any building or structure in Massachusetts. These structures could include commercial or residential buildings, water towers, cell towers and even homes – with NO effective local government authority to regulate. The telecom companies could ignore all municipal zoning provisions, ordinances and bylaws – including height limits, set-back requirements, or the ability to require aesthetic modifications to ensure the antennas and equipment blend in.

Municipalities would also have no recourse to ensure that unused or abandoned facilities must be removed in the future. The wireless telecommunications provider would only need to comply with the state building code, which is a very low technical standard.

The measure envisions no role for the general public, and fails to recognize that citizens have a right to basic zoning protections that guarantee accountability on the part of developers.

Under this proposal, in order to obtain a “collocation” permit, a mobile broadband provider would merely need to submit an application to the appropriate issuing authority in a municipality, and the city or town would have only 90 calendar days to review and act upon the “collocation” application, and could only reject applications that fail to meet the state building code. Under the language of the bill, telecom companies could start the “90 day shot-clock” by submitting incomplete applications, and have up to 45 days to complete their submissions, leaving cities and towns only 45 days to review a completed application.   If a municipality does not complete its review 90 days from the start of the “shot clock,” applicants could immediately go to court to compel the issuance of a license, short-circuiting the local process. This irresponsible provision would in no way benefit the community.

The cities and towns of the Commonwealth support expanding and upgrading wireless telecommunications services throughout the state for the benefit of consumers, but the expansion simply cannot come at the expense of the quality of life for residents.

Specific provisions of the bill include:

• No zoning ordinance or bylaw shall prohibit, regulate or restrict collocation of wireless facilities on existing structures in any way inconsistent with the industry legislation;

• The issuing authority of a city or town must grant approval of all applications for the “collocation” of wireless antennas and equipment on any existing building or structure (except utility poles), as long as the application complies with the state building code;

• Cities and towns must also approve all applications to expand existing stand-alone cell towers (including monopoles), unless the proposals would increase the height or width of the tower by 10 percent or 20 feet (whichever is more) – which means that the industry could take camouflaged antennas inside a monopole and attach a 20-foot wide antenna, and go up 20 feet, and communities would have no say;

• The issuing authority has only 90 days to approve the application – if cities and towns take longer than 90 days, then the telecom companies could immediately go to court, with approval virtually assured because the court’s only standard would be compliance with the state building code, and NO local bylaws, ordinances or zoning provisions would be allowed;

• Communities could NOT require companies to remove obsolete, abandoned or unused antennas and equipment; and

• Communities could not require a higher fee for reviewing an application than for other types of commercial applications, and fees for technical consulting would be capped at $1,000.

The FCC is Promulgating National Standards on Wireless Antenna Siting – But the Telecomm Industry is Working Feverishly to Win More Favorable Rules in Massachusetts

In 2012, Congress and the President enacted “The Spectrum Act” that will implement a nation-wide uniform process for the collocation of wireless antennas and equipment. At this moment, the FCC is promulgating final regulations that will govern the build-out of the wireless telecommunications network, and it is expected that the FCC will give industry its often-stated top goal of a time-limited expedited application process. The FCC’s rules are expected by September 2014.

Why is the telecom industry jumping to Massachusetts and other states to win a complete override of local zoning, when the FCC is on the verge of issuing its decision? The answer is clear: the FCC may give deference to local zoning rules, and allow cities and towns to act in the public interest. In particular, the FCC could allow municipalities to have zoning provisions, ordinances and bylaws on height limits, set-back requirements, or the ability to require aesthetic modifications to ensure the antennas and equipment blend in.

The Legislature should reject this fast-track attempt by the wireless industry to ignore the FCC process, and wait until the federal government issues its final rules later this year.

PLEASE CALL YOUR SENATORS TODAY AND ASK THEM TO OPPOSE ANY ATTEMPT TO PASS S. 2183 OR ANY AMENDMENT TO THE SENATE’S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BILL THAT WOULD STRIP CITIES AND TOWNS OF THE ABILITY TO REGULATE WIRELESS ANTENNAS. THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD WAIT UNTIL THE FCC MAKES ITS FINAL RULING ON NATIONAL STANDARDS.

After you call your Senators, please call your Representatives and tell them that Sections 74 and 75 of the House economic development bill (H. 4181) would strip communities of any control over wireless antennas – ask for their commitment to stop this attempt by the telecom industry to build whatever they want, wherever they want, whenever they want.

THANK YOU!