![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Click to view this email in a browser
|

![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Click to view this email in a browser
|

Comments Off on MFi Volunteer Awards deadline is 1/31
Posted in Uncategorized

The School Committee has canceled its office hours scheduled for tomorrow evening, as members are attending Representative Denis Garlick’s Report to Medfield. The next office hours are Friday, Feb. 8 at 9-10 AM at Memorial.
See the email below:
****************************************************************
Hi Pete,
Can you please spread the news that SC Office Hours scheduled for Thurs. Jan. 31 at 7pm at the high school is cancelled? Many of the school committee members will be attending Denise Garlick’s presentation.
However, luckily we have SC Office Hours scheduled for next week: Friday, Feb. 8 at 9-10am at Memorial.
Many thanks!!
Anna Mae
Anna Mae O’Shea Brooke
School Committee Chairperson
scchair@email.medfield.net
Posted in Uncategorized

2015 Medfield Foundation Volunteer Awards nominees.
The deadline to submit nominations for the 2019 Medfield Foundation Volunteer Awards is this Thursday, January 31. Nominations are made via the on-line form at http://medfieldfoundation.org/volunteer-awards/.
The recognition reception will be held at 3PM on Sunday, March 31 at The Center at Medfield, on Ice House Road, and all are welcome (and guaranteed to be inspired).

Brothers Marketplace and Roche Bros. sponsor the MFi Volunteer Awards
Comments Off on 1/31 last day to nominate for 2019 MFi Volunteer Awards
Posted in Uncategorized

Eggs laid by cage-free chickens sit in a holder after being sorted by Francis Blake on his organic farm, Wednesday, Oct. 21, 2015, near Waukon, Iowa. AP PHOTO/CHARLIE NEIBERGALL
Two groups of state attorneys general were blocked Monday from bringing a challenge in the U.S. Supreme Court against California and Massachusetts laws that set standards for the treatment of farm animals raised to produce eggs and some meats sold in those states.
The attorneys general were asking the Supreme Court to allow their lawsuits to proceed directly to high court, without going through lower federal courts first.
Indiana Attorney General Curtis Hill led a dozen other state officials at odds with the Massachusetts law. Most of the plaintiffs in that case were also involved in one that Missouri Attorney General Joshua Hawley spearheaded centering on similar California laws.
On Monday, the Supreme Court justices rejected their motions to file bills of complaint with the court, stopping the cases from moving forward. Justice Clarence Thomas indicated he would have granted the motions, according to court orders.
The Supreme Court can exercise “original jurisdiction” in legal disputes between states but has in the past opted to do so sparingly.
Massachusetts voters passed the law in question there more than two years ago.
Its intended purpose is to “prevent animal cruelty” by phasing out “extreme methods” of farm animal confinement, which could also pose consumer health threats or weigh on the state’s finances.
As written, the law will apply to the sale of shell eggs, veal and pork. It will prohibit the sale of these goods in the state if they come from animals that were confined in ways that kept them from lying down, standing up, fully extending their limbs, or turning around freely.
There are some exclusions for foods like pizzas, soups and sandwiches that include veal or pork products.
The law is set to go fully into effect on Jan. 1, 2022.
California’s laws set similar standards for hens that produce eggs sold in the state. They took effect in 2015 and have withstood challenges in lower federal courts, including one brought in 2014 by Missouri that other states involved in Supreme Court action later joined.
The attorneys general behind the current cases suggest the California and Massachusetts laws run afoul of federal law and are in violation of the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause, which prohibits state laws that discriminate against, or significantly impede interstate commerce.
A brief filed by Hawley’s office says “California is disregarding federal law by imposing novel standards on agricultural production in other States, inflating prices for consumers nationwide,” and it argues the state’s egg laws are violating the federal Egg Products Inspection Act.
One of Hill’s filings contends that, in Massachusetts, “The Animal Law nominally targets in-state retail sales, but in effect regulates animal housing in other States.”
“If the Court does not intervene,” another brief from Hill’s office adds, the law “will require compliance by livestock farmers across the country on pain of losing access to the Massachusetts market.”
The other attorneys general seeking to challenge the California statute were from Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah and Wisconsin.
Those involved in the effort against the Massachusetts law were from mostly the same states. But South Carolina and West Virginia’s attorneys general also took part and Nevada and Iowa’s attorneys general did not. Except for Iowa’s Tom Miller, who is a Democrat, the rest of the attorneys general pursuing the cases were Republicans.
Massachusetts and California in their briefs cast doubt on the standing the states had to bring the cases against their laws, posited that the dispute did not warrant the Supreme Court exercising original jurisdiction, and argued the Commerce Clause claims lacked merit.
Similarly, the Trump Administration urged the Supreme Court to deny the motions by the states to proceed with the cases.
“This case does not present the rare circumstance in which the Court would exercise its original jurisdiction to resolve a Commerce Clause question,” said a brief U.S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco’s office filed for the U.S. government in the Massachusetts case.
A filing from the solicitor general in the California dispute mirrored that position. It also took the stance that the California laws are not preempted by the Egg Products Inspection Act, despite the claims to the contrary made by the states seeking to fight the laws.
And “in order to resolve plaintiffs’ Commerce Clause challenge, both on standing and the merits,” the brief from the solicitor general’s office in the California case adds, “it would be necessary to resolve complex factual disputes that are better suited to a district court.”
Comments Off on Mass. farm animal law survives
Posted in Legal

This email yesterday from new Town Administrator, Kristine Trierweiler:
*************************************************************
Subject: Proposed FY20 Budget Online
The Proposed Budgets are now online
http://www.town.medfield.net/684/Proposed-FY20-Operating-Budgets
—
Kristine Trierweiler
Town Administrator
Town of Medfield
459 Main Street
Medfield, MA 02052
Comments Off on Budgets are now online
Posted in Budgets, Financial, Town Meeting
Agenda and materials are here 20190129-selectmen packet


Comments Off on BoS 1/29/19
Posted in Select Board matters
One more week to nominate that tireless Medfield volunteer you know for the recognition they so rightly deserve. Use the form at the Medfield Foundation website. Simple process – huge effect!
Everyone is invited to the reception to celebrate the extraordinary Medfield volunteers suggested for 2019 –
Below are the individuals suggested for recognition in 2014.

Comments Off on MFi Volunteer Awards nominations due 1/31
Posted in Medfield Foundation, Volunteers
Colleen Sullivan (Patch Mayor) corrected my election post (Thanks Colleen!) –
see below:

Comments Off on Mayor corrects election post
Posted in Elections
Medfield Cares About Prevention (MCAP) received one of the three Medfield Foundation Legacy Fund inaugural grants, one for $5,000, which MCAP will use to hire a grant writer so as to apply for the $625K five year federal grant ($125K/year) for substance abuse prevention staffing in town.
I represent the town government sector at MCAP, and at our meeting a week from tomorrow I will be trying to write that sector’s DFC grant action plan with Amanda Decker of Bright Solutions. Below is part of what Dedham included in its grant application, which was taken from the grant language itself. Here is a link to the PDF:
If anyone wants to share their ideas, they would be welcome.

Comments Off on MCAP working on grant language
Posted in MCAP - Medfeild Cares About Prevention
Town Clerk, Carol Mayer, published the material below today.
If I am interpreting Carol’s red check marks correctly, it looks like the whole School Committee, the whole Medfield Park & Recreation Commission, and all the Library Trustees are up for election.
Given that we try to have staggered terms, I am not sure how that happened, except that when people resign and a seat is filled by an interim election, I know that interim individual has to run in the next election.
January 24, 2019
UPDATE TOWN ELECTION 3/25/19There is still time to pull nomination papers for the town election. Papers are due in the town clerk’s office on 2/4/19. Attached is a brief description of.
|



Posted in Elections
Hi Pete,Unfortunately, what you posted here “If I am interpreting Carol’s red check marks correctly, it looks like the whole School Committee, the whole Medfield Park & Recreation Commission, and all the Library Trustees are up for election.” (regarding Carol’s red check marks) is not correct…. I called Carol and I will be posting the brief descriptions of the following positions (which are the only ones up for election on March 25th. – Town Moderator (1 seat) – Board of Selectmen (1 seat) – Assessors (1 seat) – School Committee (2 seats) – Library Trustee (2 seats) – Planning Board (1 seat) – Park Commissioner (2 seats) – Trust Fund Commissioner (1 seat) Sending this along in case you want to modify what you posted so there is no confusion….. Best,Colleen