Category Archives: Uncategorized

BoS on 1/17

20170117-agenda_page_0220170117-agenda_page_0320170117-agenda_page_0420170117-agenda_page_0520170117-agenda_page_0620170117-agenda_page_0720170117-agenda_page_0820170117-agenda_page_0920170117-agenda_page_1020170117-agenda_page_1120170117-agenda_page_1220170117-agenda_page_13

MFi Volunteer Award nominations

The Medfield Foundation volunteer awards for volunteers of the year are open through January 31.  Fill out the nomination form at www.MedfieldFoundation.org to give your extraordinary volunteer the recognition  he or she deserves.

All nominees with be celebrated at the Volunteer Awards reception at 3PM on March 19 at The Center.

brothers-marketplace-jgp

Brothers Marketplace generously sponsors the MFi Volunteer Awards, and support is also received from The Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation.

These were our residents nominated in 2014:

voty-20140227-poster-nominees

Mega-B redux

The Mega-B has been redesigned and reconfigured.  Below is a rendering of what it is now proposed to look like, and in the PDF files below one can see the new plans and layout in detail –  182 units, in three buildings, on just over six acres.

20170105-mega-b

20170105-engler-0_cover-letter

20170105-12_waiver-list_resubmission20170105-engler-0_cover-letter20170106-10_medfield-meadows-amended-plan-set-12-8-16201701106-1_site-approval-application_resubmission_v9

W&S rates 30% below MWRA

mwra-rates

Medfield is fortunate to have Jeremy Marsette on its Water and Sewer Board, since in his day job Jeremy runs the Natick DPW.  Jeremy sent along the following information that compares water and sewer rates from around greater Boston –


Hello all,

The annual survey of Water and Sewer Retail Rates performed by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Advisory Board was just published.  They included Medfield as one of the communities surveyed.  Attached are several pages of note from the survey.

 

Based on an AWWA standard for historical usage of 120 HCF of annual water consumption the average combined water and sewer bill for all MWRA serviced communities was found to be $1,524.84 for the calendar year 2016.  For comparison, a bill from Medfield for the same usage was found to be $1,073.48.  This represents that Medfield’s rate structure for combined water and sewer usage is 30% less than the average of all 60 MWRA serviced communities.

 

The major difference in costs is on the sewer side of the bill.  The MWWTP is the key contribution in making Medfield’s sewer costs much lower than the costs seen by MWRA communities.

 

On average MWRA communities increased water/sewer rates by 3.4% from 2015 to 2016.  Medfield increased rates by 2.4%, based on the survey’s calculations.

 

I have copies of the full rate survey, and it is also available on the MWRA Advisory Board’s website at http://www.mwraadvisoryboard.com . Please feel free to forward this information.

 

Thank you,

Jeremy

 

 

 

Jeremy Marsette, PE

Director of Public Works

Town of Natick

 

Lou Fellini feted – BoS from last night already available

I just noticed an email from Twitter telling me that our selectmen meeting from last night is already up on-line – fast work Medfield.TV!  Nice going.

Medfield Selectmen (1-03-2017): via

Lou Fellini was honored at the the Board of Selectmen meeting last night for his substantial and lengthy service to the town.  Lou Chaired the Council on Aging during both the lengthy process of getting the town to vote the monies to build The Center and then actually getting The Center built.  Lou also volunteered on the Building Committee which most recently oversaw the successful planning and completion of the Public Safety Building – on time and under budget.

lou-fellini-20170103_190703


lou-fellini-bos-20170103_190445

This second photo of Lou Fellini’s photo op is the first one taken on my new phone – which caused me to be a little slow in getting through the screens to actually taking the picture (and causing others to tell me I was being slow).

Public Safety Bld. nets energy efficiency $ from Eversource

Mike circulated this notice this afternoon.  The accompanying piece noted that the “Gross Annual kWH Savings” was 185,039 – January 03, 2017 MICHAEL J SULLIVAN MEDFIELD TOWN OF-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING 114 NORTH ST MEDFIELD, MA 02052 RE: Project Number: NC140639 - MEDFIELD TOWN OF-PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING Dear MICHAEL J SULLIVAN: I am pleased to inform you that your energy efficiency incentive in the amount of $34,549.00 has been approved for payment, which will be in the form of a check paid to the order of TOWN OF MEDFIELD . The mailing address is 114 NORTH ST, MEDFIELD, MA 02052. Please allow approximately 30 days for the payment to be processed and delivered. For additional project details, please see the attached customer report. Thank you for participating in Eversource's New Construction Program. At Eversource, we're committed to delivering great service. You may be receiving a survey asking you to evaluate your experience with this program. I hope that you will take the time to complete it so that we may use your feedback to continuously improve our programs. If you have questions regarding this incentive, please call me at 781-441-3781. Sincerely, David Giza-Sisson Energy Efficiency Consultant, Energy Efficiency Services CC: Mark Rooney 247 Station Drive, SW360 Westwood, Massachusetts 02090

Apple’s patented tech could safeguard phones from distracted driving

From my American Association for Justice daily news feed –

Family blames Apple’s FaceTime for fatal wreck.

AP (1/2) reports that the family of Moriah Modisette, a 5-year-old girl killed near Dallas in a Christmas Eve 2014 crash with a vehicle operated by a driver who was purportedly using Apple’s FaceTime video chat app while driving at 65 mph, had filed suit against the tech giant. The complaint, filed in Santa Clara Superior Court and obtained by KTLA, alleges that police found FaceTime running on the driver’s iPhone and that Apple knew the risks associated with using FaceTime while driving, but it nonetheless failed to implement iPhone technology that would have automatically disabled FaceTime when used in a vehicle moving at highway speeds – technology which Apple had itself patented in 2008.

The Washington Post (1/2, Wootson, 11.43M) reports that the driver, Garrett Wilhelm, was following the Modisette family’s Camry, and police believe that Wilhelm, due to his use of FaceTime, never saw the Modisettes’ brake lights when their car stopped, and his SUV “slammed into the Camry at full highway speed.” The Post adds that Wilhelm’s iPhone survived the collision and when police found the device, FaceTime was still running. While Wilhelm faces criminal manslaughter charges, the Modisette family believes Apple is also at fault, because iPhones should detect whether the user is operating a moving vehicle and disable the FaceTime app preloaded on iPhones. The Post notes that the Modisette case represents “yet another example of drivers’ crashing while distracted by apps on their smartphones..”

Business Insider (12/30, Price, 3.42M) quotes the central allegations of the Modisettes’ complaint, which avers that Apple’s “failure to design, manufacture, and sell the iPhone 6 Plus with the patented, safer, alternative design technology already available to it … and failure to warn users that the product was likely to be dangerous when used or misused in a reasonably foreseeable manner … rendered the Apple iPhone 6 defective when it left defendant APPLE INC.’s possession, and were therefore a substantial factor in causing plaintiffs’ injuries and the decedent’s death.”

PB vacancy- corrected – submit by 1/11/17

The prior posting about the planning board vacancy had an error about the deadline date to submit, so please be guided by this one noting the 1/11/2017 deadline.

planning

 

Medfield Planning Board Vacancy – Associate Member

The Town of Medfield Planning Board is seeking to fill a vacant Associate Member position.  Anyone who may be interested should submit a letter of interest to Evelyn Clarke at eclarke@medfield.net in the Board of Selectmen’s office by January 11, 2017.  For questions regarding the Planning Board or this specific position please contact Sarah Raposa, Town Planner at sraposa@medfield.net.

The Planning Board is an elected town board of five members, each with a five year term. The purpose of the Planning Board is to guide the development of the Town in the best interests of all its residents. The Board has very specific responsibilities and authorities as granted by Massachusetts General Laws and the Medfield Zoning By-Laws.

The Planning Board generally meets in the evening 2-3 times per month. Regular meetings are scheduled for the first and third Monday and there is usually an additional work session scheduled.

The Planning Board is responsible for the review and approval of all subdivisions (the division of a tract of land into two or more lots) through a comprehensive process involving review by relevant regulatory agencies, public hearings, covenants with developers, performance bonding, and ongoing compliance monitoring.

Under “Site Plan Approval,” in the Zoning By-Laws, the Board also has the responsibility to assure that prior to any new construction or significant changes to an existing structure, other than single family dwellings, such factors as community needs, abutters’ concerns, visual amenities, safety issues, and environmental and historic features on the site and in adjacent areas are considered.

Any requests for Zoning By-Law changes or amendments are also reviewed by the Board. Public hearings are held to allow input from any abutters or other interested citizens. The Board is required to provide a recommendation on any Zoning By-Law amendment at Town Meeting, where a two-thirds vote is required to approve the change.

The Planning Board serves as a resource to assist interested individuals with the process of proposing plans or projects under the Zoning By-Laws. Communications are maintained on an ongoing basis with related Town agencies including the Zoning Board of Appeals and other planning groups within the Town such as the Medfield State Hospital Master Planning Committee.

Letters should describe your interest in the Planning Board as well as any professional experience or other qualifications that will complement the Board. Additionally, please contemplate the following in your letter of interest:

  • Do you have ideas about the direction the Board should be headed? If so, have you thought about integration of those ideas (meaning how the idea coalesces into existing regulations or whether new regulations would need to be created)?

 

  • Land use boards such as the Planning Board, do not always have the kind of discretion to approve or deny a specific project that residents often think they have. It is important to recognize and avoid any conflict of interest; not to pursue special privileges, and maintain confidentiality. Are you prepared for being thought of as a villain by some and a hero by others?
  • Planning Boards wear two hats, proactive and reactive, and the schedule is robust. The proactive hat is devoted to long-range planning and is often difficult to quantify as the effects aren’t recognized for several years, if at all. The reactive hat focuses on subdivisions and site plan review and the effects are more immediately seen and felt in the community. How would you rationalize your reactive hat with your proactive hat? Do you see an overlap?

 

ZBA & PB vacancies

This Christmas, give our town the gift of your services.  This from Town Planner, Sarah Raposa –

planning

Medfield Planning Board Vacancy

The Town of Medfield Planning Board is seeking to fill a vacant Associate Member position.  Anyone who may be interested should submit a letter of interest to Evelyn Clarke at eclarke@medfield.net in the Board of Selectmen’s office by October 1, 2015.  For questions regarding the Planning Board or this specific position please contact Sarah Raposa, Town Planner at sraposa@medfield.net.

The Planning Board is an elected town board of five members, each with a five year term. The purpose of the Planning Board is to guide the development of the Town in the best interests of all its residents. The Board has very specific responsibilities and authorities as granted by Massachusetts General Laws and the Medfield Zoning By-Laws.

The Planning Board is responsible for the review and approval of all subdivisions (the division of a tract of land into two or more lots) through a comprehensive process involving review by relevant regulatory agencies, public hearings, covenants with developers, performance bonding, and ongoing compliance monitoring.

Under “Site Plan Approval”, in the Zoning By-Laws, the Board also has the responsibility to assure that prior to any new construction or significant changes to an existing structure, other than single family dwellings, such factors as community needs, abutters’ concerns, visual amenities, safety issues, and environmental and historic features on the site and in adjacent areas are considered.

Any requests for Zoning By-Law changes or amendments are also reviewed by the Board. Public hearings are held to allow input from any abutters or other interested citizens. The Board is required to provide a recommendation on any Zoning By-Law amendment at Town Meeting, where a two-thirds vote is required to approve the change.

The Planning Board serves as a resource to assist interested individuals with the process of proposing plans or projects under the Zoning By-Laws. Communications are maintained on an ongoing basis with related Town agencies including the Zoning Board of Appeals and other planning groups within the Town such as the Medfield State Hospital Master Planning Committee.

Letters should describe your interest in the Planning Board as well as any professional experience or other qualifications that will complement the Board. Additionally, please contemplate the following  in your letter of interest:

  • Do you have ideas about the direction the Board should be headed? If so, have you thought about integration of those ideas (meaning how the idea coalesces into existing regulations or whether new regulations would need to be created)?

 

  • Land use boards such as the Planning Board or ZBA do not always have the kind of discretion to approve or deny a specific project that residents often think they have. It is important to recognize and avoid any conflict of interest; not to pursue special privileges, and maintain confidentiality. Are you prepared for being thought of as a villain by some and a hero by others?
  • Planning Boards wear two hats, proactive and reactive, and the schedule is robust. The proactive hat is devoted to long-range planning and is often difficult to quantify as the effects aren’t recognized for several years, if at all. The reactive hat focuses on subdivisions and site plan review and the effects are more immediately seen and felt in the community. How would you rationalize your reactive hat with your proactive hat? Do you see an overlap?

 

 

Medfield Zoning Board of Appeals Vacancy

The Town of Medfield Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) is seeking to fill a vacant Associate Member position.  Anyone who may be interested should submit a letter of interest to Evelyn Clark at eclark@medfield.net in the Board of Selectmen’s office by March 1, 2017.   For questions regarding the ZBA or this specific position please contact Sarah Raposa, Town Planner at sraposa@medfield.net.

The Zoning Board of Appeals is an appointed board and acts as a quasi-judicial body deciding whether or not to vary from the Zoning By-Laws. The Zoning Board is empowered to act on appeals, special permits, variances, modifications and comprehensive permits, in accordance with applicable sections of Massachusetts General Laws and the Town of Medfield Zoning By-Laws.

Virtually all matters which come before the Board are initiated by residents or businesses seeking relief from the Zoning By-Law. Each application is processed in accordance with the legal requirements and timetables established under the Massachusetts Zoning Act, the ZBA Rules and Regulations and the Medfield Zoning By-Laws.

The Zoning Board of Appeals holds public hearings on applications for zoning variances, special permits and decides appeals of administrative decisions of the Building Commissioner. Hearings are generally held on the second Wednesday of the month at 7:30 pm in the Chenery Room in Town Hall, 459 Main Street.

Letters should describe your interest in the ZBA as well as any professional experience or other qualifications that will complement the Board. Additionally, please contemplate the following in your letter of interest:

  • Land use boards such as the ZBA do not always have the kind of discretion to approve or deny a specific project that residents often think they have. It is important to recognize and avoid any conflict of interest; not to pursue special privileges, and maintain confidentiality. Are you prepared for being thought of as a villain by some and a hero by others?

BOTS Act

Who says Congress can’t get anything done – this both fills someone’s real need, plus has a good acronym.  This is from my Thompson-Reuters newsletter.


Congress Restricts Ticket-Buying “Bots”

December 19, 2016

Money, keyboard and hand on computer mouseThe United States Congress recently passed the “Better Online Ticket Sales Act” (BOTS Act).  The new law, which President Obama is expected to sign, makes it illegal to use automated software (“bots”) to circumvent security systems that are designed to restrict purchases of tickets to public events, such as concerts and athletic events.

Currently, a variety of companies that sell event tickets use bots to make mass ticket purchases immediately after event tickets go on sale to the public.  In some instances, the bots are designed to circumvent computer systems that are intended to limit the number of tickets that can be purchased by a single buyer.

These mass purchases sometimes result in extremely rapid ticket sell-outs, frustrating individual ticket buyers.  Often, the tickets purchased using bots are re-sold to the public.  The re-sale price for the tickets is generally higher than face value.  This process thus generally results in greater costs to consumers.

The BOTS Act makes it illegal to bypass computer security measures in order to make mass purchases of tickets for events with a capacity of more than 200 attendees.  Under the terms of the Act, bypassing the computer security measures is characterized as an “unfair or deceptive act” and is thus within the regulatory jurisdiction of the Federal Trade Commission.

The goals of the BOTS Act are sensible and useful.  It is uncertain, however, that specific federal legislation was necessary in order to accomplish the objective of limiting computer security circumvention.  It seems that existing federal laws, such as the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, provide adequate authority to support legal action against parties who engage in circumvention of computer systems that are engaged in interstate commerce.

One noteworthy apparent consequence of the BOTS Act is the formal expansion of the FTC’s role in regulation of online transactions and activities.  The BOTS Act characterizes efforts to circumvent computer security systems as illegal commercial trade practices.  This appears to grant to the FTC the lead role in regulating U.S. computer security.

With the implementation of the BOTS Act, it seems that the FTC has joined law enforcement authorities at the leading edge of computer security enforcement in the United States.  That role will likely require significant resources for the FTC.  In order to execute this mission effectively, the FTC must receive substantial additional resources.