Category Archives: Budgets

Warrant Committee on Budget/Override

From Stephen Callahan, Chair of the Warrant Committee, this afternoon –

Discussion of Operating Budget
Override Article
Warrant Committee
January 13, 2026
Discussion of Operating Budget
Override Article
Warrant Committee
January 13, 2026
Updates
Budget A (Prop 2 ½ budget): New department guidance recommends 1.3% growth
rate and asks departments to idenfify cuts and savings to achieve a balanced budget.
The Select Board has voted for a placeholder for an operating budget override on the
2026 Town Warrant.
The Governor’s budget preview is expected on January 23rd, after which updated
guidance will be provided.
Many municipalities, as reported in a recent Boston Globe article, are struggling with
their budgets this year.
Why is there
an Article to
Override the
Levy Limit?
Proposition 2 ½ : The Structural Math
• Major Cost Drivers: +4 – 18% per year
Health Insurance
Special Education
Transportation
Utilities
Contractual Wages
Result: A predictable multiple year structural gap
Preference for residents to be provided with a
choice to restore some costs and service cuts
while weighing the related tax impact.Why Now?
Inflationary pressures remain high, especially in health
insurance.
Growth in state aid is modest and not sufficient to cover
increased costs and Federal relief funds have been
exhausted.
Department level service budgets are estimating annual
increases of 3% -5% for FY 2027.
Proactive planning is necessary to avoid future negative
“cliff” decisions.
Voter approved override can bridge the gap, maintaining
service levels and preventing cuts.
Scenario
Modeling of
Department
Budgets
Estimate of FY 2027 Baseline Average
Single Family Tax Bill Increase of $401
Department Budget Growth Scenarios
of:
+2.5%
+3.0%
+3.5%
Override to the Levy Limit: Impact to
Average Single Family Tax Bill
Budget
Options
Budget A ( Prop 2 ½ budget):
• Warrant Committee provided department
budget growth guidance of 1.3% with request
to identify prioritized cost and service cuts.
Budget B (Override budget):
• When deciding which cuts to restore,
departments are looking for WC guidance and
input.
• What is a reasonable department growth
rate? What is a reasonable single family tax
increase that is sustainable and has the best
possibility of passage at Town Meeting?
Scenario
Modeling of
Department
Budgets
Estimate of FY 2027 Baseline Average
Single Family Tax Bill Increase of $401
Department Budget Growth Scenarios
of:
+2.5%
+3.0%
+3.5%
Override to the Levy Limit: Impact to
Average Single Family Tax Bill
Department Budget Growth of 2.5%
FY 2026
FY 2027
Forecast
Prop 2 /12
$ Change
FY 26 to FY
27
%
Change
FY 26 to
FY 27
FY 2027
Forecast
$ Change
FY 26 to FY
27
%
Change
FY 26 to
FY 27
Override
Amount
Remaining
Revenue Available
for Departments $ 59,082,913 $ 5 9,829,657 $ 746,744 1.3% $ 60,559,986 $ 1,477,073 2.5% $ 730,329
School Department $ 44,598,730 $ 4 5,158,788 $ 560,058 1.26% $ 45,706,535 $ 1,107,805 2.48%
Town Departments $ 14,484,183 $ 1 4,670,869 $ 186,686 1.29% $ 14,853,451 $ 369,268 2.55%
Total $ 59,082,913 $ 5 9,829,657 $ 746,744 1.3% $ 60,559,986 $ 1,477,073 2.5%

Impact to Average Single Family Tax Bill
FY 2027 Assumed Department Growth
2.5% 3.0% 3.5%
Assumed Override Amount $ 730,329 $ 1,025,743 $ 1,321,158
Estimated Average Single Family Tax Bill Impact for Department Override $ 1 75 $ 247 $ 319
Estimated Average Single Family Tax Bill Impact within Prop 2 1/2 $ 4 01 $ 401 $ 401
Estimated FY 2027 Total Single Family Tax Bill Impact with Override $ 5 76 $ 648 $ 720
Assumes Average Single Family Assessed Value $1,028,374
Assumes the Estimated Property Tax Increase Within Prop 2 ½ is $1,680,701
Preferred Scenario ???
• Final recommended override amount will be after Warrant
Committee review of savings from department detailed cost
reductions and services from a Level Service budget.
• Criteria will include tax impact on residents, service restoration
extent, alignment with community priorities and fiscal
sustainability.
• Provide preliminary guidance (subject to change) to
departments for Override budgets

FY27 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET REDUCTIONS

From Town Administrator, Kristine Trierweiler this morning, her FY27 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET
REDUCTIONS to the Warrant Committee last night –

FY27 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET
REDUCTIONS
Department Proposed Cuts
Police Department Eliminate on-call animal control officer
Police Department Eliminate funding to staff community events at no charge
Assessor’s Department Reduce Full Time Admin to Part Time
MSH Maintenance Eliminate dog waste pickups
Select Board Eliminate printing GFOA Budget Book
Select Board Eliminate offsite storage at Montrose
Facilities Reduction of electricity budget due to solar
Parks and Recreation Reduction in overtime budget

MMA Suggests Solutions to Declining State Aid

GET THE FULL ARTICLE VIA THE LINK BELOW:

State aid – Unrestricted General Government Aid, or UGGA – to Medfield has declined for decades, and today is at less than half the level of our real estate property tax revenue that it was in 2007. The declining state aid has increasingly moved municipal services from being funded by the state income tax to the local property tax.

Thanks to Steve Callahan, Chair of the Warrant Committee for circulating the link to the Massachusetts Municipal Association piece that Assistant Town Administrator, Brittney Franklin shared with him.

Thanks too to the Massachusetts Municipal Association for focusing on this issue of inadequate and declining state funding.

Town’s Buildings Require $100m in Repairs in Next 5 years

 https://town.medfield.net/DocumentCenter/View/9333/Medfield_CapitalPlan_DecarbonizationStudy-1

Black Out at Budget Workshop

MEDFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT photo –

The Warrant Committee’s joint budget workshop with the Select Board and School Committee last night was ended by this tree on the wires along Main Street that turned off the electricity to the Medfield High School library, putting the meeting into darkness – the MHS’s emergency generator failed to come on. The meeting proceeded in the dimness for a short time illuminated only by the light from the computer screens and cell phones, and apparently was still being broadcast on backup power.

The workshop discussion will be re-scheduled and the discussions will continue.

Issue = only an additional 1.2% budget monies are available for spending increases for FY27, so even level funding is not possible. Plus large capital expenses required:

  1. $120 m. required to repair town buildings over the next 20 years.
  2. $100 m. required in next 5 years for priority building repairs – roofs and building envelopes.
  3. Dale Street School must be replaced.

Overrides seem needed, unless residents want fewer services.

Thank you to the Warrant Committee for starting the discussion!

Massachusetts losing $3.7 billion to Trump policies, per state dashboard

From the Globe –

New dashboard shows exactly how much federal funding Mass. is losing out on under Trump

Many Massachusetts residents are at risk of losing their Medicaid coverage, SNAP benefits, and more under the cuts.

Massachusetts is losing about $3.7 billion in federal funds due to actions by the Trump administration and the Republican-controlled Congress. Suzanne Kreiter/Boston Globe

By Ross CristantielloOctober 7, 2025 | 11:24 AM

Massachusetts officials launched a new online dashboard this week designed to clearly show how federal funding cuts are negatively impacting Massachusetts under the Trump administration. All told, the state has lost about $3.7 billion due to President Trump and a Congress beholden to him, according to the dashboard.  

From Massachusetts state website

Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Causes $650 m. Hole in Mass State Budget

  Read Online

New tax provisions brings a $650M state budget hit with the shutdown adding to the woes


  Sam Drysdale share on facebook   share on twitter   share on threads   share on linkedin

Just three months into the new fiscal year, lawmakers learned about a new wrinkle caused by the One Big Beautiful Bill: federal tax law changes within the new law that could remove $650 million in state tax revenue supports that are holding up the $61 billion annual budget.

The sweeping federal legislation, signed the same day as the state budget, could siphon hundreds of millions from Beacon Hill’s coffers, a development disclosed at an economic roundtable. The news is forcing lawmakers to rethink core assumptions and scramble for possible fiscal workarounds. Add a full-blown federal government shutdown to the mix, and the state’s economic footing looks shakier by the day.

The shutdown became official on Wednesday. Federal offices closed. Economic data streams went dark. Gov. Maura Healey didn’t mince words: “It’s terrible for our country.”

She blasted Congressional Republicans for “driving us over a cliff.”

Roughly 45,000 federal workers who live in Massachusetts could be facing furloughs, and state officials began preliminary planning last week to keep key programs afloat while federal dollars are paused.

The U.S. Department of Labor also confirmed that Friday’s national jobs report would be shelved, sidelining data that influences economic, government and business decisions.

On Tuesday, Revenue Commissioner Geoffrey Snyder dropped the news about the $650 million exposure that occurs because the state is “coupled” with many federal tax provisions, creating ripple effects.

“This is one of the more challenging times that we’ve faced from a fiscal perspective,” said House Ways and Means Chair Aaron Michlewitz, noting that while several options are on the table, few are ideal.

Budget leaders are now weighing, at a minimum, whether to dip into reserves, revise revenue forecasts mid-year (a decision due by Oct. 15), or decouple state tax law from specific parts of the federal code.

Administration and Finance Secretary Matt Gorzkowicz was blunt: “There’s a lot of uncertainty, and there’s a lot of things we have to consider in managing that.”

Pressed on whether midyear budget cuts might be necessary, Gorzkowicz said simply: “I don’t know.”

The state does $860 million in unallocated funds built into the budget, perhaps with some foresight of what was coming but possibly also due to the common legislative tendency to pass supplemental budgets.

Sen. Michael Rodrigues, however, signaled restraint around the state’s over-$8 billion reserve fund: “We have other tools available. I’d be hard-pressed to suggest dipping into the Stabilization Fund right now.”

State Flush with $, but not Sharing

From the Statehouse News Service Weekly Roundup (that former Medfield resident John Nunnari faithfully continues to share with me weekly, despite being gone 5+ years) –

“State tax collections continue to cruise, putting the total haul with just one month left in the fiscal year more than $2.8 billion ahead of last year’s pace”

Yet the state is not sharing so much with Medfield this year. Current Cherry Sheet estimated increases for state revenue sharing with towns over last year are modest.

Senate Budget #s – similar to House & Gov

The Senate released its cherry sheet budget numbers today, and the Senate’s money for Medfield tracks the House and Governor’s budget amounts fairly closely – meaning that the town will not likely see much increase in state aid next year.

Senate Ways & Means adds less than $40K for Medfield

Looks to be a lean year for Medfield’s state aid, as the Senate Ways & Means Committee added less than $40K to the House budget numbers for Medfield, which were already only small increases. All the state $ must be going for the $25m. parking garage in the Speaker’s district: