Category Archives: Budgets

Black Out at Budget Workshop

MEDFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT photo –

The Warrant Committee’s joint budget workshop with the Select Board and School Committee last night was ended by this tree on the wires along Main Street that turned off the electricity to the Medfield High School library, putting the meeting into darkness – the MHS’s emergency generator failed to come on. The meeting proceeded in the dimness for a short time illuminated only by the light from the computer screens and cell phones, and apparently was still being broadcast on backup power.

The workshop discussion will be re-scheduled and the discussions will continue.

Issue = only an additional 1.2% budget monies are available for spending increases for FY27, so even level funding is not possible. Plus large capital expenses required:

  1. $120 m. required to repair town buildings over the next 20 years.
  2. $100 m. required in next 5 years for priority building repairs – roofs and building envelopes.
  3. Dale Street School must be replaced.

Overrides seem needed, unless residents want fewer services.

Thank you to the Warrant Committee for starting the discussion!

Massachusetts losing $3.7 billion to Trump policies, per state dashboard

From the Globe –

New dashboard shows exactly how much federal funding Mass. is losing out on under Trump

Many Massachusetts residents are at risk of losing their Medicaid coverage, SNAP benefits, and more under the cuts.

Massachusetts is losing about $3.7 billion in federal funds due to actions by the Trump administration and the Republican-controlled Congress. Suzanne Kreiter/Boston Globe

By Ross CristantielloOctober 7, 2025 | 11:24 AM

Massachusetts officials launched a new online dashboard this week designed to clearly show how federal funding cuts are negatively impacting Massachusetts under the Trump administration. All told, the state has lost about $3.7 billion due to President Trump and a Congress beholden to him, according to the dashboard.  

From Massachusetts state website

Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Causes $650 m. Hole in Mass State Budget

  Read Online

New tax provisions brings a $650M state budget hit with the shutdown adding to the woes


  Sam Drysdale share on facebook   share on twitter   share on threads   share on linkedin

Just three months into the new fiscal year, lawmakers learned about a new wrinkle caused by the One Big Beautiful Bill: federal tax law changes within the new law that could remove $650 million in state tax revenue supports that are holding up the $61 billion annual budget.

The sweeping federal legislation, signed the same day as the state budget, could siphon hundreds of millions from Beacon Hill’s coffers, a development disclosed at an economic roundtable. The news is forcing lawmakers to rethink core assumptions and scramble for possible fiscal workarounds. Add a full-blown federal government shutdown to the mix, and the state’s economic footing looks shakier by the day.

The shutdown became official on Wednesday. Federal offices closed. Economic data streams went dark. Gov. Maura Healey didn’t mince words: “It’s terrible for our country.”

She blasted Congressional Republicans for “driving us over a cliff.”

Roughly 45,000 federal workers who live in Massachusetts could be facing furloughs, and state officials began preliminary planning last week to keep key programs afloat while federal dollars are paused.

The U.S. Department of Labor also confirmed that Friday’s national jobs report would be shelved, sidelining data that influences economic, government and business decisions.

On Tuesday, Revenue Commissioner Geoffrey Snyder dropped the news about the $650 million exposure that occurs because the state is “coupled” with many federal tax provisions, creating ripple effects.

“This is one of the more challenging times that we’ve faced from a fiscal perspective,” said House Ways and Means Chair Aaron Michlewitz, noting that while several options are on the table, few are ideal.

Budget leaders are now weighing, at a minimum, whether to dip into reserves, revise revenue forecasts mid-year (a decision due by Oct. 15), or decouple state tax law from specific parts of the federal code.

Administration and Finance Secretary Matt Gorzkowicz was blunt: “There’s a lot of uncertainty, and there’s a lot of things we have to consider in managing that.”

Pressed on whether midyear budget cuts might be necessary, Gorzkowicz said simply: “I don’t know.”

The state does $860 million in unallocated funds built into the budget, perhaps with some foresight of what was coming but possibly also due to the common legislative tendency to pass supplemental budgets.

Sen. Michael Rodrigues, however, signaled restraint around the state’s over-$8 billion reserve fund: “We have other tools available. I’d be hard-pressed to suggest dipping into the Stabilization Fund right now.”

State Flush with $, but not Sharing

From the Statehouse News Service Weekly Roundup (that former Medfield resident John Nunnari faithfully continues to share with me weekly, despite being gone 5+ years) –

“State tax collections continue to cruise, putting the total haul with just one month left in the fiscal year more than $2.8 billion ahead of last year’s pace”

Yet the state is not sharing so much with Medfield this year. Current Cherry Sheet estimated increases for state revenue sharing with towns over last year are modest.

Senate Budget #s – similar to House & Gov

The Senate released its cherry sheet budget numbers today, and the Senate’s money for Medfield tracks the House and Governor’s budget amounts fairly closely – meaning that the town will not likely see much increase in state aid next year.

Senate Ways & Means adds less than $40K for Medfield

Looks to be a lean year for Medfield’s state aid, as the Senate Ways & Means Committee added less than $40K to the House budget numbers for Medfield, which were already only small increases. All the state $ must be going for the $25m. parking garage in the Speaker’s district:

Draft State $

DRAFT CHERRY SHEETS – legislature proposes level funding UGGA (state aid – line 21 below)

More on CDC cutting already promised $

Follow up today from MASSterList on CDC $ Feds cut –

READ IN BROWSER

CDC pulls COVID response grants

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention pulled about $11.4 billion in Covid-19 pandemic response grants allocated to state and community health centers on Wednesday. The Department of Health and Human Services said the agency will “no longer waste billions of taxpayer dollars responding to a non-existent pandemic that Americans moved on from years ago.” In a statement released Wednesday, Gov. Healey said the grants are expected to bring nearly $100 million to Massachusetts over the next year, but that “much” of the funding has already been obligated in the state — the Trump administration is moving to eliminate the unobligated parts of the grants. Healey condemned the federal decision, calling it “yet another example of President Trump and Elon Musk undermining the health and wellbeing of the people of Massachusetts and people across this nation.”

MDPH Notice of CDC Abrupt Cuts of $ that Supported Community Based Organizations – Local DOGE Effect?

From: Office of Local & Regional Health <localregionalpublichealth@notice.mass.gov>
Date: Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 1:44 PM
Subject: Federal funding update | Message from DPH Commissioner Goldstein
To: <ktrierweiler@medfield.net>

View this email in your browser Message from the Commissioner  

Wednesday, March 26, 2025  

Dear Colleagues,
I know that many of you have heard from colleagues or from media reports that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has notified state departments of public health — including the Massachusetts Department of Public Health — about the termination of multiple COVID-19 related federal awards. Obviously, this news is troubling. We rely on these funds to carry out important ongoing work at the Department and with our partners in the community. These resources fund our state lab, supplement our statewide vaccine infrastructure, and provide the support needed for community-based organizations across the state. These are more than just COVID-19 awards; they represent investments in the core functions of public health.
 
We are working quickly to analyze the fiscal and operational impacts of these abrupt terminations. We are also in close contact with our colleagues in the Healey-Driscoll Administration to consider what we might be able to do to mitigate the impacts, recognizing that we do not have the state resources to replace these federal funding sources.
 
We are still sorting through the implications of these sudden terminations and do not have all of the answers. Still, I think it is important for you to know where we are given the potential impacts on our work, our community partners, and our colleagues. We will share additional information about the short-term and longer-term impact of these announcements when we know more.

With gratitude,  Robbie Goldstein, MD, PhD (he/him)
Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Public Health    

If you have any comments, questions, or feedback, please email:
 localregionalpublichealth@mass.gov  

Office of Local & Regional Health
Massachusetts Department of Public Health
67 Forest Street
Marlborough, MA 01752
(617) 753-8018 Visit our website!   Follow DPH on X (formerly Twitter)

Final Warrant Committee FY 2026 Omnibus Prop 2 1/2 Budget Guidance

From Steve Callahan, Co-chair of the Warrant Committee today –

Dear Medfield Budget Makers and Elected Officials                                                      

Update

This email will serve as a brief update to our December 11, 2024 communication to budget makers on the Department FY 2026 Operating Budget targets.   The Warrant Committee has completed their review of the FY 2026 omnibus operating budget (forecasted revenues and shared/fixed costs) and voted at our meeting on February 26, 2025 to bring forward to Town Meeting an FY 2026 Operating Budget within the Prop 2 ½ framework. 

This final FY 2026 Operating Budget (attached below) allows for a maximum increase in aggregate FY 2026  appropriations/expenditures for school and town departments of 3.4% and 3.5%, respectively over their FY 25 approved budgets.

A host of net unfavorable factors required a decrease in previously provided targets.  The most significant matter was the recently updated estimate of health insurance costs from MIAA for active and retired employees of Medfield school and town departments (representing a 16.92% rate increase).

Accordingly, the FY 2026 Operating Budget brought forward by the Warrant Committee to the Town Meeting will allow for an aggregate limit on any increases in the FY 2026 school and town departments of 3.4% and 3.5%, respectively.  The amount of COLA for non-contract employees who are not covered by the Collective Bargaining Agreements and salary increases as stipulated by relevant Collective Bargaining Agreements for contract employees are expected to fall within these aggregate limits.  As previously communicated, any department requests above these aggregate limits are expected to necessitate a Prop 2 ½ override and supplemental budget. 

The Warrant Committee looks forward to receiving final department  budgets from the Superintendent, School Committee and Town Administrator on the details of their budget requests within these aggregate limits in the next couple of weeks in order to move forward with the preparation of the warrant report for Town Meeting.  We remain committed to sustainable balanced budgets within the Prop 2 1/2 framework that continue to provide essential and important services, and that the Town’s overall costs and tax rate are controlled as well as possible.

Best,

Steve Callahan

This email is intended for municipal use only and must comply with the Town of Medfield’s policies and state/federal laws. Under Massachusetts Law, any email created or received by an employee of The Town of  Medfield is considered a public record.  All email correspondence is subject to the requirements of M.G.L. Chapter 66. This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender and delete all copies.