MMA annual meeting

I just registered for the business sessions of the Massachusetts Municipal Association’s annual meeting in January, which I have always found to be a great resource for ideas and new approaches.  Being frugal, I do not register for the dinners or the hotel, and just commute back and forth.  Here is the schedule for this year – let me know if there is something that you especially think I should cover.

Friday, January 24, 2014


8 a.m.-5 p.m Conference Registration Hynes, Hall C foyer, 2nd floor
9:30-11 a.m. Opening Session
Keynote Speaker: Jon Meacham
Hynes, Ballroom B, 3rd floor
11 a.m.-5 p.m. Municipal Trade Show Hynes, Hall C & Auditorium
Noon-1:30 p.m. WEMO Luncheon (preregistration required)
Speaker: Public Safety Secretary Andrea Cabral
Hynes, Ballroom C, 3rd floor
2-3:30 p.m. CONCURRENT WORKSHOPS – Friday session
• Building Your Professional Network
• Civility in City Hall
• Data Breaches: Is Your Community Vulnerable?
• Hoarding Response: Increasing Effectiveness, Decreasing Costs
• Labor Law Update
• New Opportunities and Changes in Municipal Renewable Energy
• Options Outside of Civil Service
• Planning Ahead: Smart Growth and Sustainable Communities
• Pushing Broadband the Final Mile
• State and Local Economic and Budget Outlook
Hynes, 2nd floor meeting rooms
3:45-5:15 p.m. EMERGING ISSUES FORUMS
• Fiscal Stewardship and Sustainability
• Rebuilding the New England Village as a Healthy Community
• Technology, Transparency and Accessibility: Local Government on the Cutting Edge
Hynes, 3rd floor meeting rooms
6-7 p.m. Opening Reception Sheraton, Constitution Ballroom foyer, 2nd floor
7:15-9 p.m. Banquet Dinner, MMA President’s Address
Special guest: Liz Walker
(Preregistration required)
Sheraton, Grand Ballroom, 2nd floor
Saturday, January 25, 2014


8 a.m.-3:30 p.m Conference Registration Hynes, Hall C foyer, 2nd floor
7:30-8:30 a.m. Member Associations Breakfast Hynes, Ballroom B, 3rd floor
BUSINESS MEETINGS FOR MEMBER ASSOCIATIONS
8:30-10 a.m. • Massachusetts Municipal Councillors’ Association Hynes, room 306
8:30-10 a.m. • Massachusetts Selectmen’s Association Hynes, Ballroom C, 3rd floor
8:30-10 a.m. • Massachusetts Mayors’ Association Hynes, room 300
8:30-10 a.m. • Massachusetts Municipal Management Association Hynes, room 313
10 a.m.-2 p.m. Municipal Trade Show Hynes, Hall C & Auditorium
10:15-11:50 a.m. MMA Annual Business Meeting
(incl. President’s Address)
Hynes, Ballroom A, 3rd floor
11:50 a.m.-noon MMA Board of Directors Meeting: Election of Officers Hynes, Ballroom A, 3rd floor
noon-1:30 p.m. MIIA Luncheon and Business Meeting (by reservation only) Hynes, Ballroom B, 3rd floor
1:45-3:15 p.m. CONCURRENT WORKSHOPS – Saturday session
• Beyond GO Bonds: Innovations in Infrastructure Improvement Finance
• Capital Planning: Affording the Big Stuff
• Connecting Veterans to Needed Services
• Federal and State Health Reform Update
• Giving Citizens Numbers They Can Understand: Citizen-Centric Reporting
• Grant Opportunities for Green Infrastructure
• Making the Case for Regional Emergency Dispatch
• Municipal Law Update
• Open Meeting Law Update
• Pavement Management: Making Your Chapter 90 Money Go Further
Hynes, 2nd floor meeting rooms
3:30-5:15 p.m. Closing Session
Gubernatorial Candidates’ Forum
Hynes, Ballroom A, 3rd floor
6-7:15 p.m. Presentation of Innovation, Municipal Website and Town Report Awards; President’s Reception Sheraton, Constitution Ballroom
7:15-9:15 p.m. Annual Banquet (preregistration required)
Entertainment: The Second City
Sheraton, Grand Ballroom

Interview by Jack Peterson

Jack Peterson’s Medfield.TV show “Selectmen Update” with me and the Hometown Weekly’s editor, Josh Perry is now on-line via Medfield.TV’s Youtube link at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGftBRZqtCI

Volunteer awards online

The Medfield Foundation’s Volunteer Awards for 2010, 2011, and 2012 are now online thanks to Medfield.TV and are available for viewing any time.  The Youtube links to each are indicated below:

2010 – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHdvGAEHqf8

2011 – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gVVyqRhhaM

2012 – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z–mRrf7F_g

2013 – I am told that 2013 will be coming soon.

 

 

 

Lyme Disease national info

This email with interesting info from the Congress on Lyme Disease-

  • more ticks because of global warming
  • “Lyme disease only receives $25 million from NIH compared with $3 billion for HIV/AIDS and $112 million for Hepatitis C, despite Lyme incidence being magnitudes greater at 300,000+ new Lyme cases per year in US as compared to 50,000 new cases of HIV/AIDS and 17,000 new cases of Hep C”

was shared by Erica Reilly of our Lyme Disease Study Committee –

From: Nancy Dougherty
Subject: Senate Briefing on Lyme Disease
Date: December 9, 2013 at 10:00:46 PM EST
To: undisclosed-recipients:;

Dear friends,

I attended a Senate briefing in Washington DC last week sponsored by the Tick-Borne Disease Alliance (TBDA) to address the national health crisis of Lyme and tick-borne diseases.  The briefing was aimed at advancing Senate Bill S.719, the Lyme and Tick-Borne Disease Prevention, Education, and Research Act. Lyme disease is a major public health problem and testimonies from prominent physicians, advocates and chronic sufferers were compelling.  Senate staffers heard loud and clear that current diagnostics are unreliable, hundreds of thousands of patients are suffering, global warming is accelerating the worldwide epidemic, and more research funding is vitally needed.

Washington is starting to recognize the magnitude of human suffering and economic burden [$3B+ in US] created by Lyme and tick-borne diseases.  Staffers from Rep. Chris Gibson, (R-NY), Senator Kirstin Gillibrand (D- NY) and Senator Bob Casey’s (D- PA) offices told me fighting Lyme disease is a priority and they will work to improve education for awareness & prevention and funding for research to improve diagnostics & treatments. However, the Lyme disease community needs to unite toward these common goals.  Senator Gillibrand, along with Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Jack Reed (D-RI), and Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) are cosponsoring S.719, which would establish a Tick-Borne Disease Advisory Committee and invest additional federal funds into Lyme disease research and education.  Congressman Chris Smith (R-NJ), founder and co-chair of the Lyme Disease Caucus in Congress, has sponsored similar legislation in the house (HR610 and HR611).

Lyme disease only receives $25 million from NIH compared with $3 billion for HIV/AIDS and $112 million for Hepatitis C, despite Lyme incidence being magnitudes greater at 300,000+ new Lyme cases per year in US as compared to 50,000 new cases of HIV/AIDS and 17,000 new cases of Hep C (sources: NIH and CDC websites).

David Roth, Co-Chairman of TBDA, stated “National Institutes of Health (NIH) found that the impact of Lyme disease on physical health status was at least equal to the disability of patients with congestive heart failure, osteoarthritis and greater than those observed in type 2 diabetes”.  Dr. Patricia DeLaMora, Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Weill Cornell Medical Center, said “Children are disproportionately affected by Lyme disease. We need accurate diagnostics and a well-educated medical community. The current diagnostics for Lyme disease are unreliable in the early stages when recognition and treatment are vital, and cannot accurately distinguish between old and new infections.” John Donnally, a 24 year old Lyme disease survivor and advocate who just completed a 3500 mile cross-country cycling public awareness TBDA campaign “Bite Back for a Cure”, conveyed “the epidemic is pernicious and rampant and a meaningful number of people do not get better”. Additional testimony from patient advocates, Karla and Victoria Lehtonen and Kelly Downing, illuminated their devastating stories of multiple systemic Lyme disease that baffled numerous medical experts due to inadequate diagnostics, resulting in ongoing symptoms including severe neurological impairment.  Karla quoted Dr. John Aucott’s research as indicating a significant percent of patients fail treatment and go onto chronic illness.  Dr. Richard Ostfeld, PhD, disease ecologist and Lyme disease specialist at Cary Institute, said “climate change is broadening the geographic range of ticks and their pathogens and the public health impact is getting worse”. When Heather Thompson (entrepreneur & Bravo Housewife of NYC) posed the question, “Do any of you want Lyme Disease?”, there was an uncomfortable silence.  A universal conclusion was the need for more research for tick control, diagnostics and therapeutics. 

Another important event in Washington last week was the FDA’s approval of Gilead’s Hepatitis C drug, Sovaldi, on Friday.  This novel oral drug is a direct-acting antiviral agent effective across a range of Hep C genotypes, adding an important weapon to the therapeutic armamentarium for anti-HCV therapy.  Why is this important or relevant for Lyme disease?  Because it shows that investment in research can produce significant innovation that will substantially improve patients’ lives!  This is an important shift in the treatment paradigm for Hep C patients since the need for side-effect inducing interferon shots will be reduced or eliminated.  It’s also a model for future Lyme disease therapeutics that could potentially, like Sovaldi, target disease specific mechanisms with improved efficacy and work in a range of genotypes.  Also, it’s important to recognize that innovations for illnesses such as HIV/AIDS, Hep C, Cancer and other illnesses depend upon a collaborative national network of clinical research centers for testing innovative diagnostics and therapeutics.  This is presently non-existent for Lyme disease, so there is much work ahead to improve outcomes for patients with Lyme disease as compared with these other illnesses.

Dr. John Aucott has a nationally recognized leading-edge Lyme disease clinical research program at the Lyme Disease Research Foundation that is generating scientific evidence to enhance the understanding of the pathophysiology of the illness and enable the progression of improved diagnostics and therapies. However, at the briefing, it was acknowledged that programs of this caliber are not sustainable indefinitely without government support.  For more information about the Lyme Disease Research Foundation, please visit www.LymeMD.org/.  Donations to fund this vital research are greatly appreciated and will make a meaningful difference in advancing the Lyme disease field.

Thank you for your interest in keeping abreast of Lyme disease issues. Wishing you good health and an enjoyable holiday season with family and friends.

All the best,

Nancy

Nancy Dougherty

Lyme Disease Research Foundation
617-686-8185
Please follow me on twitter @NancyNDougherty

Brothers Marketplace signs

Roche Bros. circulated the attached plan of the proposed signs for their new market, which they are calling “Brothers Marketplace.”  The facades and the signs look really nice to me.

Primary tomorrow, final 1/7/14

From the Medfield League of Women Voters –

Special State Election
Ninth Norfolk Representative District*
IN MEDFIELD the 9th District IS PRECINTS 3 AND 4*
(to fill vacancy due to the resignation of Representative Daniel B. Winslow)

December 10, 2013 = State Primary

December 18, 2013 = Last day to register voters for the state election; registration hours 9:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. (except in towns under 1500 registered voters, registration hours 2:00–4:00 P.M. and 7:00–8:00 P.M.).

January 7, 2014 = State Election
150 certified signatures required for all candidates.
To verify that you are an active voter or

To determine what your precinct is in Medfield
Log on to:
Town of Medfield, MA
Town Services
Town Clerk
Voter Information
Am I registered to vote?
Enter your information: Last Name, First Name, Birth Date
Click Search
Here you will find out if you are active, what party you are affiliated with or unenrolled and what precinct you are in.

*Norfolk County Ninth District
Medfield – Pcts. 3, 4
Millis – Pct. 1
Norfolk
Plainville
Walpole – Pct. 5
Wrentham

Information Provided by Medfield League of Women Voters

SHAC meeting re MSH site

The State Hospital Advisory Committee (SHAC) met 12-5-2013, and Jim Rohnstock authored excellent meeting notes of what transpired.

In my mind the big unresolved issues are –

  • TIMING:  The timing of the special town meeting (STM) to take up whether the town will want o pursue the purchase of the Medfield State Hospital site.  All agree that consideration should happen before the Patrick administration leaves office in January 2015, and if that is to happen the required legislation will need happen before the legislature dissolves for elections next year, which may be during the summer.  The timing of the legislative calendar will therefore control the timing of our municipal consideration of and voting on the purchase.  The town will just have to back out the timing as to when the special town meeting (STM) will have to occur to meet the legislature’s schedule.  Inquiries will be made to determine the legislature’s timing, and then we can set our schedule.  My recollection the last time we dealt with the legislature over getting legislation for the Medfield State Hospital was that the legislature stopped meeting for the year in July, but we will learn more soon.
  • ULTIMATE USES:  Given the need to schedule an early special town meeting (STM) to consider the Medfield State Hospital land purchase, the town will probably not have sufficient time to engage in a completed discussion of what ultimate uses it wants to make of the site.  That we require us to decide whether we as a town want to buy the site, before we have a concrete plan in hand as to what we will do with the land after any purchase.  I hope that by the special town meeting (STM) on the purchase, that we will at least have general consensus and agreement on the broad concepts of what the town will do with the land, such as a consensus that the town will seek to partner with developers to build certain sorts of things on the land versus leaving the site as open space.  Even if there is building and development at the site, there will still be lots of open space left for residents to use, just as it is now available to us.
  • DEMOLITION:  Dealing with the decrepit buildings at the site will be a major issue.  I have come to be convinced that it is unlikely that the vast majority of the buildings can be saved for new uses given the exceedingly high cost to do so.  One can rehab any structure, but the question is at what price, and the dilapidated condition of most of the Medfield State Hospital buildings combined with the requirements of the current building codes means that any reuse of those dilapidated buildings will cost lots and lots of money, monies that the town would then have to be willing to pay.  While I personally like a lot the look of the buildings and the their placement on the site, and while I started from a position of wanting to save the buildings, I have since learned the high price to rehab such buildings, and I am now not willing to pay the lots of extra costs needed to salvage them.  Economic realities have made me a reluctant convert to the need to demolish most of the buildings at the Medfield State Hospital site.   There was some discussion of demolition costs at the meeting last week, with the following information imparted:  (1) someone related an expert opining to him that it would cost $5.5 m. to demolish all the builds (without accounting for the abatement costs), (2) experts related general demolition costs of $10-15 per sq. ft. plus $10 per sq. ft. for the abatement, (3) Foxborough State Hospital’s demolition cost $15 per sq. ft. (not at prevailing wage), and (4) DCAMM stated that on average, paying prevailing wages, that it pays $16 per sq. ft., all in (including abatement), to demolish buildings.  There are approximately 600,000 sq. ft. of buildings at the Medfield State Hospital site, so in a worst case scenario, using the DCAMM $16 per sq. ft. number, it would cost the town about $9-10 m. to demolish all the MSH buildings if the town did the demolition.  Everyone seems to agree that at the very least that the Lee Chapel building should be saved.  I am hopeful that the R building and the other building in front of the R building that were most recently rehabbed can be saved as well.  If the town decided on some development at the site, the logical thing would be to have the developer do the demolition, as they would not have to pay prevailing wages, and hence the cost would be substantially less (perhaps on the order of one-third to half less).
  • HISTORIC BUILDINGS:  The site is listed on the National Register of historic properties.  There do not yet appear to be precise answers as to just what the Massachusetts Historic Commission (MHC) will and will not allow with respect to demolition, but we do know that they recently reversed themselves to allow the requested demolition of the Odyssey House to proceed.  The MHC will also probably look to see what the Medfield Historic Commission says it wants done at the site in turns of saving versus demolishing the buildings.  To date, members of our own Historic Commission have opined towards saving as many of the buildings as possible.    The SHAC survey of the condition of four representative building will hopefully give us good data on whether the buildings can be saved and if so at what cost.

Residents should weigh in soon with their opinions about the Medfield State Hospital land on the survey SHAC has posted at its website, as the survey will probably be closed before the end of the year.  Find the survey and the SHAC’s other information at the committee’s website www.MSHvision.net.

DOR’s DLS’s newsletter

This article from the Massachusetts Department of Revenue’s Division of Local Services’ newsletter.  Medfield opted to not adopt the Community Preservation Act, and as a result we leave the state matching money on the table every year.    –

State Releases FY2014 Matching Funds for Community Preservation
Lisa Juszkiewicz – Director of the Municipal Databank

On November 15th, the Division of Local Services (DLS) processed the annual distribution of state funds to the 148 communities that adopted the Community Preservation Act (CPA) statute and collected the local surcharges during FY2013. The state match totaled $54.9 million and was funded through the traditional Registry of Deeds revenue collections and a one-time infusion of $25 million in state surplus revenue. The combined revenue sources allowed for a first round match of 52.22 percent. This is the first time the first round state match has been over 50 percent since FY2010. Without the additional revenue added to the trust fund this year, cities and towns in the program would have received a first round match of less than 31 percent and total state funding of $32.7 million.

According to the Community Preservation Act, there are three potential rounds for distributing the state match. 

  • Round 1 distributes 80% of CPA trust fund balance to all CPA participants
  • Round 2 equity distribution (only for those with 3% surcharge)
  • Round 3 surplus distribution (only for those with 3% surcharge)

When there are sufficient available funds in the trust fund to match the net surcharge committed, the CPA statute requires the Division to provide a 100 percent match. For the first six years of the program, the revenue stream into the trust fund was enough to provide for a 100 percent match. In those years when the trust fund balance is not sufficient to provide for a 100 percent match, the Commissioner of Revenue has discretion as to whether all of the three rounds will be used. In FY2009, the first year that there was not enough money to provide a 100 percent match, the Commissioner chose to distribute matching funds using only the first and second rounds. By holding back the Round 3 surplus distribution, we were able to reserve a little additional funding for FY2010, decreasing the rapid reduction in the state match slightly. Since FY2010, DLS has calculated the state match using all three rounds.

In FY2013, 148 communities assessed the surcharge on property tax bills making them eligible for the state match in FY2014. Of the 148 communities eligible, 75 have adopted the CPA at 3 percent making them eligible for all three rounds. There are a number of communities that have adopted the surcharge at three percent and continue to receive a 100 percent state match. Of the 75 communities that adopted the maximum three percent surcharge, 23 are receiving a 100 percent state match. These communities collectively account for only $3.5 million of the total $92.5 million committed statewide by all communities that have adopted the surcharge. In addition to the 23 communities with a 100 percent match, there are five communities with a state match over 90 percent and another five communities receiving between 80 and 89 percent state matches.

The table below details the annual state match, the number of communities participating and the first round match for each year of the program:

. 

Funding for the state Community Preservation trust fund comes from fees imposed at the Registry of Deeds or in Land Court for recording various documents. These fees are deposited into the trust fund monthly and are used to calculate the state match for the local surcharge imposed on property tax bills. In the last several years, the transaction fees have decreased as a result of the downturn in the real estate market. The decrease in registry revenues, combined with the increased number of communities participating, has resulted in a significant drop in the percentage of the state match since FY2008, the last year the Commonwealth matched 100 percent of the net surcharge committed.

In an effort to restore funding to the CPA program, language contained in the FY2014 state budget (Section 145 of Chapter 38 of the Acts of 2013) provided for supplemental funding of up to $25 million. This funding was to come from the Commonwealth’s general fund surplus, provided that the state surplus was sufficient to accommodate this transfer. The State Comptroller’s office reported in early November that there were sufficient revenues in the state’s FY2013 surplus to allow the full $25 million to be transferred to the Community Preservation trust.

As the chart below illustrates, there has been a significant drop in the amount of the state matching funds in comparison to the amount of the surcharge cities and towns have committed. Without the additional revenue added to the trust fund this year, cities and towns in the program would have received less than a 31 percent state match. This slight increase reflects an uptick in the amount of fees collected at the Registry of Deeds and Land Court, which is consistent with reports of increased property sales.  Another factor is that with the distribution date changed from October 15th to November 15th, there was an additional month of collections included in the state fund for distribution month.

. 

As we have done in the past the Municipal Databank has posted the current state match on the Division’s website. An Excel file with the details by round can be downloaded from the following link:
http://www.mass.gov/dor/docs/dls/mdmstuf/cpa/fy14cpapayment.xls
.

This file also includes the data used to create the tables and charts appearing above, as well as the historical state matching funds by community since the beginning of the program.

MFi volunteer awards open

Nominations Open for Medfield Foundation Volunteer Awards

Nominate an extraordinary person for the 2014 Medfield Foundation volunteer awards by 1/31/14.

Michelle Doucette was nominated for last year’s Medfield Foundation Volunteer Awards.
Michelle Doucette
Michelle Doucette was recognized last year for her work with the American Legion Auxiliary, the Dwight-Derby House, the Veterans Day Luminaries celebration that she started, and the Home Committee

Nominate someone for the 2014 Medfield Foundation volunteer awards by downloading the form from www.medfieldfoundation.org, and e-mailing your nomination as an attachment to MfiVolunteerAward@gmail.com no later than January 31, 2014.

The MFi’s 2014 volunteer recognition reception, again sponsored through the generous community spirit of the Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation, will be held from 3 -5 PM on Sunday, March 23, 2014 at The Center – all are welcome.

Light a Candle 7PM Sunday

Email from David & Annie Domeshek –

12/05/2013 8:32AM
Light a Candle
===========================================================

Sunday, December 8th, is the night set aside to light a candle all over the world for children who have died. Unfortunately, the list of children we light for has grown every year. Please light a candle, for one hour, for Natasha and all the others, at 7:00 p.m. this Sunday night. It goes around the world so that for 24 hours they will all see our lights.

As the Compassionate Friends newsletter says, “It takes only you and one candle to join hearts with the world.”

Gratefully,

Annie and David