Category Archives: Budgets

Guide to municipal management in MA

The Pioneer Institute has published and distributed to us a Guide to Sound Fiscal Management for Municipalities, on how to operate a town in Massachusetts.  Always good to get help in doing the things that we do to run Medfield.

This guide comes with a downloadable Excel worksheet that allow one to compare us to 14 other towns, which then compares Medfield’s metrics to those of the other 14 towns.  The spreadsheet actually suggested most of the towns to use for the comparison, based on the major similarities.   Interesting to use to compare Medfield to other towns.

BTW, it says we are now down from 1st to 3rd in the state on the percentage of our population in school.  24% of Medfield attends school, versus 15.1% statewide and 19.4% of the 14 towns I selected for comparison.

Medfield’s debt, debt service,  debt and debt service as a % of budget, debt as a % of EQV, and debt at a % of budget were all a lot higher than both the towns the program selected and the ones I added.

In broad general terms, based on the towns in my comparisons, our school and DPW costs were generally higher, while our police and fire costs were generally lower than in the comparison towns.

I highly recommend this tool for anyone who wants to know how what we are doing in Medfield compares to other towns.  It gives you the figures and graphs them out for easy comparisons.

 

 

Income Per Capita (2009)
MEDFIELD $64,433
State Median $28,058
Peer Median $51,034

Local tax base preserved in state energy bill

The Massachusetts Municipal Association issued this alert today –

LEGISLATURE’S FINAL ENERGY BILL PRESERVES LOCAL TAXING AUTHORITY

In a significant victory for cities and towns, the final energy bill developed by a joint House-Senate conference committee, preserves the ability of communities to collect property taxes on solar and renewable energy facilities.

The MMA and local officials across the state have been communicating with legislators all year, expressing grave concerns about provisions in earlier versions of the bill passed by the House and Senate that would have exempted certain renewable energy facilities, including commercial solar facilities, from the property tax.  Instead, communities would have been allowed to collect a much lower PILOT equal to 5 percent of electricity sales. In essence, the previous versions of the legislation would have provided developers with a windfall, and reduced important revenues that communities collect and use to pay for critical local services.

The members of the conference committee (Reps. Keenan, Hogan and Beaton, and Sens. Downing, Brewer and Hedlund) heard the message loud and clear, and removed the tax provisions from the final bill.

The Legislature is expected to enact the compromise energy bill as soon as today, and send it to the Governor.

Please call your legislators today and thank them for protecting local decision-making and taxing authority.

 

On another important municipal issue, the Governor last week signed the “terms bill” for the $200 million fiscal 2013 Chapter 90 local road fund distribution that was authorized by separate legislation signed in June.  With both bills now law, cities and towns can begin signing contracts for local Chapter 90 projects based on the provisional apportionment letters sent by MassDOT to cities and towns on April 1.

CPA benefits strengthened

Recent amendments of the Community Preservation Act (CPA) make it even more appealing to towns to adopt.  The CPA has towns committing to taxing themselves form 1 – 3% more each year in order to gain state matching funds.  Those matching funds were generated by surcharges on recording fees at the registry of deeds, and the % match had dropped from the initial 100% match as fewer transactions were recorded and more towns adopted the CPA, such that the match went down to about 1/3 if I recall right.

The state both better funded the match and amended the uses to which the monies can be put – the following is from the DOR’s Division of Local Services newsletter –

==========================

Governor Patrick Signs Changes to Community Preservation Act

Gov. Deval Patrick has signed into law an expansion of the Community Preservation Act (CPA) and a $25 million transfer from the state’s FY13 budget surplus to the statewide CPA Trust Fund, for distribution to communities in the fall of 2013.

The one-time transfer would supplement the existing source of revenue from the fund which comes from surcharges on fees paid to the record certain documents at the Registry of Deeds. Matching CPA grants paid from the trust to cities and towns adopting the CPA have decreased in recent years due to more participating communities and lower Registry collections reflecting a softened housing market.

The amendments, signed as part of the budget the governor signed on July 8, contains a number of changes relative to allowable CPA expenditures for recreation and housing assistance to individuals. The law also provides more options for paying into a CPA fund. The amendments are found in Chapter 139 of the Acts of 2012, Sections 69-83, 155 and 218. They took effect on July 1, 2012.

Here are highlights of these new provisions.

CPA Fund Uses:

  • Permit rehabilitation of existing recreational land not created or acquired with CPA funds
  • Expand the definition of rehabilitation to allow for capital improvements and replacement of recreational equipment
  • Add definition of capital improvement as reconstructions or alterations that materially add value or prolong the property’s life, are part of the real estate and are intended as permanent or indefinite installationsProhibit use of CPA funds to acquire artificial turf for athletic fields
  • Allow communities to include allowable recreational projects in meeting their annual 10% open space spending requirement
  • Define prohibited maintenance, as incidental repairs that do not add value or prolong the property’s life but keep the property in a condition of fitness, efficiency or readiness
  • Add definition of support of community housing as including grants, loans, rental assistance, security deposits, interest-rate write downs or other forms of assistance provided directly to individuals who qualify for community housing or entities that own or operate community housing
  • Allow communities to use in the first year only some of their CPA administrative and operating expenses to cover costs associated with tax billing software upgrades, but in an amount including other administrative expenses not greater than 5% of the annual revenues in the CPA fund

Other Revenue Sources

  • Allow communities to adopt the CPA at ballot with a minimum 1% property tax surcharge and then dedicate additional municipal revenue sources (such as local option tax revenue) to their CPA fund up to the full 3% of the real estate tax levy against real property
  • Allow communities that have already accepted CPA at a surcharge level above the 1% the option of reducing their CPA surcharge to 1% while committing additional municipal revenues their CPA Preservation Fund

Surcharge Exemptions

  • Add a new optional commercial exemption for the first $100,000 of property value for commercial and industrial properties, mirroring current exemption for residential property

Property Restrictions

  • Clarify that a real property interest acquired (rather than simply purchased) by a city or town by any mechanism using CPA funds must be bound by a separately recorded permanent restriction limiting its use to the CPA purpose for which it was acquired
  • Clarify that CPA funds may be appropriated to non-profit organizations to hold, monitor, and enforce restrictions limiting the use of land to CPA purposes

The above summary was prepared by DLS staff.

Final Cherry Sheets are out

I got notice this afternoon from DOR that the final Cherry Sheets have been issued, these after the Governor’s line item vetos, and so the FY13 state budget is final now.  The bottom line for Medfield  are the same as came out of the legislature’s budget, and we are about $210K better off than last year.

Final local aid

DOR reports that its Division of Local Services has posted updated local aid estimates based on the legislature’s Conference Committee’s budget recommendations.  These are the cherry sheet numbers for Medfield, $7,051,687.   We gained about $210,000 over last year, $197,000 over the Governor’s budget this year, but for some reason lost a buck from the House’s budget numbers.  A lot of that gain may have been the extra $40/pupil that was put into local aid this year.

Ch. 90 $ remains almost level

This email came yesterday from Dan Winslow’s office –

======================

Michael –

Medfield can expect to receive $401,430.00 in c. 90 funding for the 2013 fiscal year.  This is a decrease of $1,034.00 from the 2012 apportionment of               $402,464.00.

Please be in touch with any questions.

Best,

Nina

Nina S. Hong

Legislative Aide and Counsel

Office of State Rep. Dan Winslow

State House, Room 33

Boston, MA 02133-1054

Tel: 617-722-2060

Fax: 617-626-0602

MMA’s statement on the state budget

The Massachusetts Municipal Association issued the following statement on the budget released by the legislature today –

Key Local Aid Programs $144M Higher than Budget Filed by Gov. in January

“Municipal leaders across the state applaud the leaders and members of the House and Senate for writing an outstanding state budget for cities and towns, and are deeply grateful to Speaker Robert DeLeo, President Therese Murray, Chairman Brian Dempsey, Chairman Stephen Brewer and the members of budget conference committee, Vice Chairman Stephen Kulik, Vice Chairman Jennifer Flanagan, Rep. Vinny deMacedo, and Sen. Michael Knapik.  Communities are struggling mightily to fund essential services, and the state budget before the Legislature today embraces a lasting fiscal partnership to strengthen municipal finances and provide funds for public safety, education and other vital local programs.

“By passing this budget, every legislator is demonstrating their commitment to local aid, and their determination to invest in cities and towns as an essential step in the state’s economic recovery.  The Legislature’s budget will increase fiscal 2013 municipal and education aid by approximately $144 million above the budget submitted by the Governor in January, and $289 million above  current fiscal 2012 levels, an outstanding achievement that will benefit every community in Massachusetts.”
–––––––––––––––––––––
According to the MMA’s initial analysis of the budget, the key proposals in the Legislature’s fiscal 2013 state budget include the following:
• Guaranteed funding for unrestricted municipal aid of $899 million, by adding $65 million to the base Cherry Sheet distribution, instead of relying on a tentative supplemental distribution later in the year.
• Adding $34.7 million to Chapter 70 school aid above the Governor’s recommendation to ensure that every city, town and school district receives an increase of at least $40 per student above current education aid levels, and to renew the target aid distribution to scores of school districts that was suspended in 2008.
• Fully funding Special Education reimbursements by increasing funding by $29 million, a major step that would benefit every community and school district in the Commonwealth.
• Providing $11.3 million for the transportation of homeless students under the McKinney-Vento Act, adding a new line item to reimburse cities and towns for the cost of this new mandate.
• Increasing funding for regional school transportation reimbursements by $2 million, bringing funding up to $45.5 million.
• In addition to standard local aid accounts, the Legislature’s budget would provide up to $25 million in funding for the Community Preservation Act in fiscal 2014 by creating a mechanism to allocate a portion of any state budget surplus remaining at the end of fiscal 2013.

MMA Leadership conference on Saturday

This past Saturday I attended the Massachusetts Municipal Association’s annual Leadership Conference for selectmen, which was held at the Pleasant Valley Country Club in Sutton.  Excellent program on how to be a better selectman for your town – I regretted that Ann and Mark were not able to attend.

The main speakers were the MMA’s Executive Director, the deputy State Auditor (filling in for an ill auditor), and Commissioner James McHugh of the Gaming Commission (filling in for the Director of the Gaming Commission).

Goeff Beckwith, the MMA’s executive director, updated us on the budget and legislative actions.  See the linked copy of the  Massachusetts Municipal Association’s letter to the budget conferrees to see the MMA’s positions on the issues.

The Auditor’s office has been charged to avoid unfunded mandates from the since 1985, so we need to get Mike Sullivan telling them which ones they need to look into.

The Massachusetts DOER did a presentation on the Green Communities Act, and its benefits (grant monies).

The Town of Amherst’s budget people explained how they do their annual budget cycle.

The Attorney General’s Office and an attorney from Kopelman & Paige did a presentation legal issues – the Open Meeting Law, public records, conflict of interest, and generally running the town without legal problems.  Their lengthy handouts were all authored by attorneys and are copyrighted, so I cannot post them.

My favorite session was one called Strategies for Creating Civil Discourse in Government, which was presented by a mediator, and described the use of mediation techniques to move issues forward.  I have included one of her handouts.

Town’s spending per pupil from FY03 to FY12

Charlie Kellner, the schools business manager prepared the following figures that show the town’s spending per pupil from FY03 to FY12.

https://medfield02052.blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/20120601-ck-per-pupil-net-of-chap-70.xls

Yearly tax increases averaged 2.6% since FY05

Mike Sullivan distributed to the Board of Selectmen Tuesday evening the attached speadsheet he had prepared about the taxes over time, FY05 to Fy13.  Taxes increased 20.6% over that time, or an average of 2.6% per year.