Category Archives: Budgets

Pension reform proposal

Emailed to me by Mike Sullivan –  Swampscott selectmen seek authority to deal with unfunded retirement benefits for new employees –

===================

Michael,
I wanted to reach out to all Massachusetts municipal officials about a Home Rule Petition the Town of Swampscott is pursuing relative to pension reform. The goal of this petition is to give freedom to each city and town in the Commonwealth to offer an affordable plan for retirement benefits to new hires. As you know, the State of Massachusetts currently mandates a defined benefit plan. In other words, we have no freedom to choose what is a financially sound plan for our city or town.

A quick visit to the PERAC web site details how towns from Andover ($75 million unfunded liability) to Melrose ($45 million unfunded liability) to Swampscott ($36 million unfunded liability) are facing onerous debt that is now and will continue to be a drain on investment in capital improvements, education and town services.

And it will get much worse if we don’t act soon.

Interestingly, the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) passed new rules for pension accounting that go into effect in 2013. Two key components of the changes will force pensions to use a much more realistic method of “discounting” or, what most people refer to as investment returns. The State still uses 8.25% as a discount rate for future investment returns by pensions. In its Annual Report, PERAC likes to refer to an average rate of return over the last 27 years of close to 9%. But the reality is that since 2000, the return is closer to 4%. This has a dramatic effect on unfunded obligations and as a result, how much of your property tax revenue is spent on benefits.

GASB will require all municipalities to use a number closer to 2% to determine a true accounting of each system. When that happens, look out below – taxpayers will be shocked to learn how much they are on the hook for in the future. Additionally, GASB will no longer allow for smoothing, which enables pension accountants to meter out the highs and lows, giving a skewed view of the current liabilities and assets. To read exactly what GASB will be requiring, click here.

I believe the State has not done enough to mitigate the risk of pension fund exposure to taxpayers. That is why I’m pushing a Home Rule petition that gives each municipality the right to choose a plan – for new employees – that it finds affordable. Ideally, the State would offer multiple plans to choose from, whether a defined benefit, shared risk or defined compensation plan. For those towns that want to continue down the same path they are on – no problem. But for those of us who are compiling unwanted liabilities and seeing retirees live longer while fewer current employees are paying into the existing plan – we’d have some relief.

This type of system is working in Connecticut, Florida and other states that allow for Home Rule. If you’d like to read articles on successful negotiations between unions and municipal government for new employee benefits, click here.

I’m asking you to join my efforts and help build a coalition for Home Rule. If you would like to see the language Swampscott currently plans to use as an Article this spring at town meeting, please email me and I’ll send over a copy. We are open to suggestions you may have as well.

Thank you,

Barry Greenfield
Selectmen, Town of Swampscott
Editor & Publisher, EfficientGov

MMA on state funding gap for road repairs

This was the Massachusetts Municipal Association’s “alert” sent to me this afternoon –

MMA REPORT: Cities & Towns Face a $362M Funding Gap to Maintain and Repair Local Roads

• MMA Calls for $100M More in Annual Chapter 90 Funding for Local Roads

• Investing in Chapter 90 Strengthens the Economy, Saves Taxpayers Millions 

Earlier this afternoon at a State House press conference, the MMA released a comprehensive report documenting that cities and towns across the state face an annual shortfall of $362 million in the funding needed to maintain municipal roadways in a state of good repair, the industry standard for ensuring well-maintained roads in good condition.  The MMA immediately called for a $100 million-a-year increase Chapter 90 funding, the state-backed program that funds local road repairs.  This is an essential step to invest in the state’s economic future, and necessary to save taxpayers millions of dollars in more costly projects when roads fail.

DOWNLOAD THE MMA REPORT BY CLICKING HERE

For the past several months, the MMA has been collecting data from cities and towns across the state, and that information confirms that communities in Massachusetts need to spend $562 million every year to rebuild and maintain local roads in a state of good repair, but communities spend far less because of inadequate resources.  The result can be seen in potholes and crumbling roads across the state.

Chapter 90 provides just $200 million a year, or only 36% of the actual need, resulting in a massive local funding gap of $362 million a year.

PLEASE SHARE THE MMA’S CHAPTER 90 REPORT WITH YOUR REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATORS, AND REMIND THEM OF THE FOLLOWING:

• Cities and towns are responsible for 30,000 miles of roads in Massachusetts, and Chapter 90 funding must be increased to prevent these roads from deteriorating and crumbling.  Economists and transportation experts all agree – cities and towns must have enough funds to maintain and rebuild local roads so that we can build a stronger economy, create jobs, ensure safe roadways, and enhance our quality of life;

• Funding for local roads across the state is dangerously low, and now is the time to invest – the more we delay, the more this will cost taxpayers in the long run.  The MMA and local officials across the state are calling for a $100 million increase in annual Chapter 90 funding, asking state leaders to commit to $300 million a year over the next 5 years to help close the gap and get local roadways in Massachusetts much closer to the good repair standard;

• Chapter 90 funding is the most reliable, appropriate and effective way to close the local transportation funding gap and invest in improved roadways in all communities across the state;

• The state created the Chapter 90 program in 1973 to share a portion of gas tax revenues with communities to ensure adequate resources for local road construction needs.  But almost 40 years later, funding for the Chapter 90 program is far short of the actual need, because construction costs have escalated sharply, in great part due to significant increases in the cost of fossil fuels, which drives up the price of construction materials such as asphalt and steel;

• Investing more in Chapter 90 funding to improve the quality of local roads will actually save taxpayers millions of dollars a year.  According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, once a local road is in a state of good repair, every $1 dollar invested to keep it properly maintained will save $6 to $10 dollars in avoided repair costs that become necessary to rebuild the road when it fails;

• Under Proposition 2½, cities and towns are unable to increase the amount of local funds to supplement Chapter 90 unless they cut other important services such as public safety or education, or pass a tax override, increasing local reliance on the already overburdened property tax; and

• The MMA and local officials across the state are also members of the broad coalition of stakeholders calling for a comprehensive state and local transportation finance plan, recognizing that the entire Commonwealth will benefit greatly from increased revenues to invest in local and state roadways and highways, and regional and mass transit systems.

$1 spent on roads saves $6-10 later

CITING “CRUMBLING” ROADS, MUNI GROUP SEEKS BIG HIKE IN STATE AID

By Andy Metzger
STATE HOUSE NEWS SERVICE

STATE HOUSE, BOSTON, DEC. 18, 2012…..There is a $362 million funding gap between what Massachusetts cities and towns require to maintain roads in a “state of good repair” and the amount of state funding currently available for local roadways, according to Massachusetts Municipal Association survey results released on Tuesday.

“The MMA’s survey results reveal that cities and towns in Massachusetts need to spend $562 million every year to rebuild and maintain local roads in a state of good repair, but communities spend far less because of inadequate resources,” the report states. “The result can be seen in potholes and crumbling roads across the state.”

State funding for local roads, known as Chapter 90, is currently at $200 million per year. The MMA, which represents cities and towns, is asking for a 50 percent funding increase to begin more aggressively addressing the gap and to bring the annual allocation up to $300 million per year for the next five years.

In January, the Patrick administration and the Legislature are planning to discuss a new transportation financing proposal, a discussion that was speeded along by a funding crisis at the MBTA last year that was solved with fare hikes and a state bailout. Chapter 90 strategies will likely figure into the discussion.

With spending on track to outpace revenues, Gov. Deval Patrick this month outlined a $540 million budget-balancing plan featuring across-the-board cuts and drawing heavily from the state’s reserves. Economic experts say slow growth means tax revenue growth will only slightly improve next year.

Every year, the Legislature allocates funding to municipalities for local roads projects, and the $200 million disbursed to cities and towns was a record high last year. This year the state kept the same funding level.

For the past two years, the Legislature has delayed the final approval of Chapter 90 funds, leading to some frustration from local officials who often can’t afford to undertake road projects without the assurance that the state will foot the bill.

“There is today a deep level of frustration with what is happening with Chapter 90, frustration around what should be a good story,” Braintree Mayor Joseph Sullivann said in June, months after the April 1 notification date called for in state law.

Providing adequate funding to keep roads in good repair prevents them from turning into more costly projects, according to the MMA, which said each $1 spent to keep roads properly maintained results in savings of $6 to $10 in avoided costs of more extensive repairs.

“If Massachusetts fails to pass a comprehensive transportation finance plan to address the critical funding needs at the local and state levels, taxpayers will face massive bills over the next 20 years to reconstruct a deteriorating system,” the MMA report said.

Cities and towns are tasked with maintaining 30,000 miles of road throughout the state.

Tax bills may go out today

The Massachusetts Department of Revenue certified the town tax rate lat week.  This allows the town to send actual real estate tax bills for the third quarterly fiscal year 2013 real estate tax (the first two tax bills were based on estimates).  The town’s Treasurer Collector, Georgia Colivas, was reported by Mike Sullivan as hoping to get the tax bills out today.  She sends the tax bills early as a courtesy to those tax payers who want to pay the tax bill during the calendar year, for their own income tax planning purposes.

DOR certifies tax rate

From: dor.state.ma.us
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 9:10 AM
To:
Subject:  Tax Rate Approval Notification

Massachusetts Department of Revenue Division of Local Services
Amy Pitter, Commissioner
Robert G. Nunes, Deputy Commissioner & Director of Municipal Affairs

Medfield Assessors                Date: 12/6/2012 9:09:08 AM

Dear Assessors:

The Fiscal Year 2013 tax rate has been certified by the Bureau of Accounts for Medfield.

The four pages of the tax rate recapitulation form and the levy limit worksheet (not applicable to districts) are available on the Division of Local Services website:

Tax Rate Recapitulation Form

Levy Limit Worksheet

Page one of the tax rate recapitulation form includes the Director of Accounts’ electronic signature and the date of approval. This letter is your notification of approval pursuant
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 59, section 23. Please forward copies of this notification to other officials as you deem appropriate.

We wish to thank you for your cooperation and assistance in the tax rate setting process.

Sincerely,
Gerard D. Perry
Director of Accounts

MMA on state budget changes

The Massachusetts Municipal Association sent out this information in an email alert about the state budget cuts –

GOVERNOR CITES $540M STATE BUDGET SHORTFALL IN FY 2013

• Gov. Implements $225M in Program Cuts Using His 9C Budget Powers

• Reduces Municipal and Education Accounts by $28.75M

• Gov. Files Bill With Legislature to Cut Unrestricted Local Aid by $9M

Earlier this afternoon, Governor Deval Patrick announced that the state is facing a $540 million shortfall in its fiscal 2013 budget, and he unveiled a plan to close the budget gap this year.  He announced that he is using his “9C” emergency budget powers to implement $225 million in immediate cuts to state-funded programs in executive agencies under his control, and he proposed legislation to expand his 9C authority so that he can cut $9 million, or 1%, from Unrestricted General Government Aid, as well as 1% cuts to the judiciary, constitutional offices, and the Legislature.  His plan would also withdraw $200 million from the state’s rainy day fund.

Click HERE to link to the A&F website that contains the Governor’s announcement, his budget reductions, and his legislation.

$28.75 MILLION IN IMMEDIATE CUTS TO KEY SCHOOL AND MUNICIPAL PROGRAMS

Using his existing authority to declare a fiscal emergency and reduce executive branch spending, generally referred to as 9C powers, the Governor has unilaterally reduced funding for state agency accounts under his control by $225 million.  Many of these cuts will be painful for cities, towns and school districts.  The MMA has identified the local government accounts impacted the most, listed in order of the size of the mid-year budget cut:

• $11.5 million from the Special Education Circuit Breaker program  (a 4.8% cut)

• $6 million from Municipal Regionalization and Efficiencies Incentive Grants (a 41.2% cut)

• $5.25 million from the McKinney-Vento homeless student transportation account (a 46.5% cut)

• $2.5 million from the Chapter 70 “Pothole” account (a 71.4% cut)

• $1.3 million from Veterans’ Benefits reimbursements (a 2.9% cut)

• $1 million from Regional School Transportation (a 2.2% cut)

• $1 million from Charter School Reimbursements (a 1.4% cut)

• $83 thousand from School-Based Health Programs (a 0.7% cut)

• $68 thousand from Universal Pre-Kindergarten (a 0.9% cut)

• $45 thousand from the Municipal Police Training Committee (a 1.8% cut)

• In addition, a shortfall in sales tax collections will reduce the total sales tax revenue amount that flows to the School Building Assistance program by $20 million, which A&F officials say should not impact planned projects (we recommend contacting SBA if you have a project pending to receive an update on the status of your project and make sure there is no impact).

ASK YOUR LEGISLATORS TO OPPOSE THE GOVERNOR’S LEGISLATION TO IMPOSE A $9 MILLION MID-YEAR CUT TO UNRESTRICTED GENERAL GOVERNMENT AID

In a move that surprised the Legislature and local officials, the Governor has filed legislation requesting expanded 9C powers to reduce non-executive agencies by 1%.  This includes a proposal to have the Legislature approve a 1% cut in Unrestricted General Government Aid (UGGA) for every city and town, for a mid-year reduction of $9 million.  The Governor’s bill includes language saying that any unexpected increases in Lottery profits would go to cities and towns before the end of the year, potentially offsetting a portion of the cut, but this is no guarantee and, given the economy, very unlikely.  The MMA will strongly oppose any cut to unrestricted municipal aid, because that would destabilize local budgets in the middle of the fiscal year, and force reductions in community services.  Unrestricted municipal aid has already been cut 32%, or $416 million below original fiscal 2009 levels, and any additional cuts will be painful for cities and towns across the state.

Please Call Your Representatives and Senators Today and Ask Them to Oppose the Governor’s $9 Million Cut to Municipal Aid.

Gov. cuts budgets & seeks power to reduce local aid

PATRICK CUTS SPENDING BY $225 MILLION, WILL SEEK POWER TO CUT LOCAL AID

By Michael Norton and Matt Murphy
STATE HOUSE NEWS SERVICE

STATE HOUSE, BOSTON, DEC. 4, 2012…..As part of a plan to address an estimated $540 million mid-year budget gap, Gov. Deval Patrick on Tuesday slashed spending by $225 million and asked the Legislature to allow him to unilaterally reduce unrestricted local aid to cities and towns by 1 percent.

Unrestricted local aid pays for local services, such as public safety budgets, and is delivered separately from state aid to fund local education spending, which is not targeted for cuts under Patrick’s plan.

“I don’t think this is draconian. Obviously every city and town worries about an impact on their local aid, but as I say this is relatively modest. We are spreading the pain as broadly as possible and sensible and we have a solution for closing that gap in unrestricted local aid if the Lottery continues to help,” Patrick said.

The spending cuts ordered by the governor will hit nursing homes, special education funding, school transportation for the homeless and reimbursement rates for hospitals that treat low-income patients.

Patrick is asking to trim local aid by $9 million, and said if Lottery revenue exceeds expectations the surplus would be used to restore the reduced funding at the end of the year.

Senate budget chief Stephen Brewer told the News Service Monday that he did not sense an appetite within the Legislature to grant the governor local aid-cutting powers. Lawmakers are scheduled to return to Beacon Hill in January, when the governor’s proposal will await their attention.

Patrick used his existing budget management powers to reduce $225 million in spending through so-called 9C cuts, a 1 percent reduction to the total state budget that will result in the defunding of 700 positions in state government and, according to the governor, affect services to the state’s “most vulnerable” residents.

Patrick is also calling for $200 million to be drawn from the state’s $1.65 billion rainy day account to plug holes and prevent deeper spending cuts amid a weak economic recovery.

Patrick called on Congress to address the “fiscal cliff” this year, blaming uncertainty over scheduled tax hikes and spending cuts for private sector angst about expanding and the future of the economy.

“By all accounts that uncertainty and the resulting slowdown in economic growth is the direct cause of our budget challenges. Economists agree that the fiscal cliff is keeping a tremendous amount of capital on the sidelines,” Patrick said.

Patrick said $300 million this fiscal year and $1 billion in the next fiscal year is at risk for state budget writers depending on the outcome of negotiations between President Obama and Congressional leaders. “The cost of inaction is immense,” he said.

The state budget is also facing significant and still unknown costs associated with an evidence tampering debacle that has forced public officials to revisit thousands of drug cases previously thought to be settled.

Spending on Medicaid, the state’s largest program, is a perennial concern and administration officials said they are on track to meet or exceed roughly $500 million anticipated savings in that program and $730 million in overall health care savings associated with Medicaid and other health insurance programs.

Though not as bad as past years during the depths of the recession, Patrick said the state’s budget problems are “serious” and could worsen depending on federal machinations.

After a disappointing month of tax collections in October opened a $256 million budget gap four months into the fiscal year, November revenues rebounded slightly and came in $21 million above projections, but still $235 million short for the year to date.

Under the cuts Patrick announced, no agencies will see budgets reduced below fiscal 2012 levels.

Administration and Finance Secretary Jay Gonzalez said administration officials now believe tax collections this fiscal year will total $515 million less than the administration and legislative budget writers assumed when they compiled this year’s $32.5 billion budget.

Gonzalez officially lowered the state’s expected tax take this year to $21.496 billion, and said he expects the state to collect $381 million more than in fiscal 2012 but $515 million less than estimates made last December and used to build the budget.

Gonzalez expects tax collections to slightly rebound over the final seven months of fiscal 2013.

Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation President Michael Widmer, who monitors budget developments on behalf of the business-backed group, said he agreed with Patrick’s revised state revenue estimate.

“The budget-cutting steps, while painful, are certainly necessary,” Widmer said.

Widmer identified the impact of the midyear budget problems on the fiscal 2014 budget as the “larger issue,” estimating about $800 million in onetime revenues in the fiscal 2013 budget won’t be available for fiscal 2014, which begins on July 1, 2013.

“That’s a huge hole the state faces for fiscal ’14,” Widmer said.

Roughly speaking, Widmer said, the state budget has been under pressure through three years associated with the recent recession and the last two years which have featured modest economic growth, with rainy day fund and federal stimulus law funds driven into the budget and coupled with major spending cuts.

“It is the longest period of fiscal pressures of this magnitude,” Widmer said. “The economic recovery has been so weak both nationally and here that we haven’t had much in the way of revenues. That’s the sad reality. This is now the fifth year.”

A $20 million salary reserve to provide raises to human service workers is not being reduced, Gonzalez said. “It is available to disburse to human service workers,” he said.

Patrick is also calling on leaders of the other two branches of government, the legislative and judiciary, to agree to 1 percent cuts to their own budgets for a savings of $25 million.

The current budget problems don’t require additional revenues, Patrick said, while suggesting his upcoming long-term transportation financing plan would feature new revenues.

The governor’s budget plan also defers $20 million in sales tax revenue that would have gone to the Massachusetts School Building Authority to the general fund, and makes cuts to budgeted hospital rate increases, special education and veteran benefit accounts.

Gonzalez said hospital rate increases for providers caring for certain MassHealth patients would be reduced by $52 million, a special education increase would be cut from $28 million to $17 million, and $1.3 million would be trimmed from veterans’ benefits due to decreased caseloads.

Municipal regionalization grants and budgeted increases in nursing home rates will also be decreased.

Gonzalez said the state has realized about $113 million in savings from lower than expected borrowing costs, of which $20 million will be used to offset the revenue gap. The supplemental budget to be filed by Patrick asking for 1 percent cuts in non-executive branches of government and local aid also proposes to spend the remaining $93 million from debt service savings on caseload driven accounts like homelessness.

Geoffrey Beckwith, executive director of the Massachusetts Municipal Association, said cuts to special education reimbursements, school transportation and local aid will impact municipal budgets mid-year and be difficult to address for cities and towns.

Noting cuts to local aid that have built up over several years, Beckwith said, “This is an additional cut of $9 million opening up question marks for every single community’s budget.” He said the MMA will ask the Legislature not to approve the cut in unrestricted local aid.

“They’ll have to take reductions in programs and services. The 1 percent sounds small but it will destabilize current budgets in place and have communities have to take action. They cannot wait,” Beckwith said.

For detailed information about the spending cuts, go to: http://www.mass.gov/anf/budget-taxes-and-procurement/state-budget/fy13-budget-info/fy13-budget-cut-information

END
12/04/2012

Buget season began

Mike Sullivan handed out his initial budget projections last night at the Board of Selectmen’s annual budget meeting, which is held jointly with the Warrant Committee and the department heads.  The basic assumptions contained in this initial budget is that town budgets will increase 2%, except for employee benefits which go up 7% (for health insurance and pensions).

Warrant Committee chair Gus Murby noted that while this is the year to budget for those things that have been deferred in the past several tough budget  years, where the financial pressures are not expected to be as great this year as they have been in recent years, Gus still noted the need to keep budgets lean due to expected town expenditures related to special situations.  He listed the DPW garage, the Gatehouse 40B, and the Medfield State Hospital as the examples.

The budget meeting is the opening of the town’s annual budget season, that next has each department preparing its own individual budget requests, then defending those to both the Board of Selectmen and the Warrant Committee, and culminates with the passage of the budgets at the annual town meeting (ATM) the last Monday in April.

The Building Committee has indicated that it intends to ask the town to vote to build a new DPW garage at the ATM.

Underfunded future obligation

Finance

Finance (Photo credit: Tax Credits)

Article on underfunded municipal pensions from the Lincoln Institute – see the link below.  The article says that the first principle of municipal finance, that you pay now for what you incur now.  Medfield’s pensions are actually pretty well funded, but our obligation for employees’ future health care costs for our retirees is not, to the tune of about $40m.   Mike and I have suggested that the Board of Advisors (former selectmen) explore how to deal with that issue, once the state commission looking at the issue reports back this fall.  This from the article –

Pension Legacy Costs and Local Government Finances

Richard F. Dye and Tracy M. Gordon
Local government pensions are significantly underfunded because many governments have not set aside enough funds each year to cover the liabilities incurred. In effect, they are borrowing to pay for current labor services and shifting the burden to future taxpayers.

Enhanced by Zemanta

State unfunded pension liability up X5 in last 11 years

The Boston Business Journal article on the state’s mushrooming pension liabilities  –

“Jim Lamenzo, the actuary for the state’s Public Employee Retirement Association Commission, said during a presentation Monday that the state’s unfunded pension liability stood at $23.6 billion as of Jan. 1, but has undoubtedly grown in the interim due to the delayed ripple effects of the state’s near 30 percent investment loss in the year following the downturn. Lamenzo said the state’s unfunded pension liability totaled $12.1 billion on Jan. 1, 2008, and was $4.8 billion as of Jan. 1, 2000 — meaning the commonwealth’s unfunded obligation to retired public workers has essentially quintupled over an 11-year span.”

Also, at that webpage they have a link to a searchable pension database where one can search the pension of any retired state official by name, or by all the employees in a particular state department.  Wm Bulger is getting $199K, Sal DiMasi is listed at $66K, but I believe his has been stopped.