This from the Massachusetts Municipal Association to explain the details of Governor Baker’s cuts as they affect towns –
Wednesday, February 4, 2015
GOV. BAKER FILES PLAN TO CLOSE FY 2015 STATE DEFICIT
Governor Protects Unrestricted Municipal Aid and Chapter 70 Education Aid
9C Reductions Impact Only a Few Local Accounts
On Tuesday, February 3, Gov. Charlie Baker announced a comprehensive plan to close a gaping $768 million mid-year state budget deficit. As the Governor promised to local officials at the MMA Annual Meeting late last month, his budget-balancing plan protects Unrestricted General Government Aid and Chapter 70 school aid, keeping full funding in place for the remainder of the fiscal year.
The Governor’s package contains $514 million in mid-year spending reductions, including $150 million in cuts in state budget items implemented through the Governor’s “9C” emergency budget powers, and relies on $254 million in revenues directed into the state’s general fund, most of which will come from capital gains taxes that otherwise would flow into the Commonwealth’s rainy day fund.
Governor Baker’s 9C reductions cover 300 line items in the state budget, and are much more modest in terms of their municipal impact than any of the 9C cuts implemented over the past decade. In terms of reductions to Cherry Sheet accounts, these are limited to a $943,000 reduction for METCO (5%), and reductions of less than half of one percent for library aid programs ($42,499 from regional public libraries and $38,700 from non-regional libraries). There were no programmatic cuts to regional school transportation, payments-in-lieu-of-taxes (PILOT), or other Cherry Sheet items.
However, there are several 9C reductions to non-Cherry Sheet accounts that are important to cities and towns:
• A $1.9 million reduction in charter school reimbursements (a 2.46% cut below the November level) – this will affect those communities that lose Chapter 70 school aid to charter schools, and rely on the state reimbursement account to make up a portion of the lost funds. This reduction will vary from community-to-community because the $1.9 million will be taken from reimbursements for students in years 2-5 of the formula, so the impact will depend on the specific profile of area students attending charter schools. We recommend that cities, towns and school districts contact DESE for more information;
- A $5 million reduction to kindergarten development grants (a 21% cut below the November level) – this will impact those communities that are relying on kindergarten grants to offer or expand this service locally;
- A $1.25 million reduction to Shannon anti-gang grants (a 15% cut below the fiscal 2015 appropriation) – this will impact those communities scheduled to get the grants; and
- A modest $250 thousand reduction to the Special Education Circuit-Breaker (slightly less than 1% below the November level) – the exact impact will be determined by DESE.
Beyond the 9C cuts, the Governor has filed legislation to impose reductions to other areas of the state budget, and implement other revenue transfers and policies. The Governor’s proposed legislation would generally require a 1.79% reduction to those state accounts outside of his 9C authority – importantly, the legislation specifically exempts Unrestricted General Government Aid and Chapter 70 from mid-year cuts, consistent with the Governor’s pledge. In general, the 1.79% reductions are designed to include the Legislature, judiciary, constitutional officers, and quasi-independent agencies in the budget-balancing plan.
Please click on the following link to see the Administration’s budget-balancing plans in detail, including a list of all 300 9C reductions (“FY15 February 9C Line Item Listing”) and the proposed legislation (“Filed 9C FY15 February Supplemental Legislation”) – http://www.mass.gov/anf/budget-taxes-and-procurement/state-budget/fy15-budget-info/fy15-budget-cut-information/
The MMA will be analyzing the details of the Governor’s legislation and 9C reductions over the coming days. Please monitor the MMA’s website at www.mma.org for continuing updates.
Thank you.


Pete-
I find it absolutely stunning that there is no coverage of school budgets, in particular the relationship of cost to rising and falling student populations. School spending represents, far and away, the largest item in any town or city budget, yet no one seems to want to deal with the issue. Also, I see nothing on the agenda that addresses the massive shortfall in the funding of employee benefits. I note that there’s a session on “Lessons and land mines”. Is this a tutorial to help public officials avoid facing the really important fiscal issues? Very disappointing.
Sent from my iPad
Charlie,
Thanks for your comments. i am catching up,so please excuse my delay.
First, town officials have absolutely no say or control over school budgets, so I would guess that is the reason that there are no MMA seminars on school budgets. The town as a whole can only approve or not the total school budget at the town meeting, but once a budget amount is approved by the town meeting it is then up to the superintendent as to how those monies get spent. While I am exceedingly interested in the school budget issues you raise, please know that i already probably spend about 20 hours a week already just trying to do my volunteer job as a selectman (and i also have a full time job as an attorney), so I have yet to find the extra time to study the school budget issues. Also, those issues really are the purview of the school committee, not the selectmen, despite my interest.
I see that the school committee meeting to discuss the budget got postponed by the storm, and so i encourage you to go to the re-scheduled meeting to raise your school budget issues with them.
Second, I certainly did hear about OPEB liabilities again this year at the MMA annual meeting, although I did hear more about it last year. The MMA is seeking to be part of the solution, crafting legislation to improve the OPEB situation. Governor Patrick’s commission on the OPEB issue made recommendations over a year ago, but the MMA opposed them on the basis that they both did not do enough and also what id did do would make things worse for towns. Look at the MMA’s website (www.mma.org) and you should find the action item that the membership voted on this past Saturday morning to ask the legislature to enact OPEB reforms.