Category Archives: Affordable housing / 40B

BoS last night – talk, but no action

Lots of educational discussion at last night’s the Board of Selectmen meeting about the affordable housing rules and our status, but no decisions on how to proceed were made. The agenda we followed is below.

I suggested to my colleagues that my strategy, to get us protection from 40B’s, is to use the Hospital Road 40B’s 12 affordable units, combined with the siting of two group homes in town with five disabled residents in each group home to get to the needed 22 affordable units, which combined with an approved Housing Production Plan would protect the town for a year from unfriendly 40D proposals.  I would then seek to gain two more years of protection by building 42 units at Tilden Village.  The Housing Production Plan should be approved by the end of November, so our real task is how to build the required affordable housing units.

I suggested to my selectmen colleagues that the selectmen must clearly assign the Town Administrator the task to get this done as soon as possible, because to protect the town it needs to be done before the Mega-B applies to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a comprehensive permit, and that is likely to happen next February or March.  I do not see that anyone but the town administrator can get this done, unless the town does what we did with the Medfield State Hospital project of hiring a consultant to lead the town to get it done.  I made that same suggestion, to assign the task to Mike, at the selectman meeting last Tuesday.  My selectmen colleagues were not ready Tuesday, or again last night, to assign the task to Mike, so I fear we are currently moving sideways.

BoS

Agenda for September 26th Selectmen’s Meeting Affordable Housing Workshop

Welcome by Mark Fisher, Chairman of Board of Selectman and Introductions

This meeting is being recorded. We will begin by observing a moment of appreciation for our Troops serving in the Mideast and around the world.

 

A.      Presentation on Housing Production Plan and Strategies by Roberta Cameron, consultant from Community Opportunities Group (COG)

 

B.      Affordable Housing Discussion

 

1.       Adoption of Housing Production Plan

a.       Approval by Planning Board

b.       Approval by Board of Selectmen

c.       Submission to and approval by State

 

2.       Implementation of Housing Production Plan

a.       Selection of locations for future 40B housing developments

b.       Determination of developers (Town (LIP), non-profit, for-profit) and types of housing

c.        Bidding, sale and/ or transfer (disposition) of land

d.       Details of financing methods

e.       Request for site approval from Mass Housing

f.        Application to Zoning Board of Appeal for Comprehensive Permit

g.       Appeals Period

h.       Bidding for design, construction, site work, landscaping, etc.

i.         Construction

j.         Lottery and/or marketing of units and determination of management plan

 

3.       Construction of Additional units at Tilden Village

a.       Transfer of Land and Project Approval from State (which Agencies)

b.       Project Funding

c.       Selection of Project Manager and Architect

d.       Design, Bidding and Construction (Public construction process)

e.       Tenant Selection

 

4.       Update on Hospital Road 40B project

a.       Status

b.       Options

 

5.       Update on Dale/North Meadows 40B project

a.       Status

b.       Options

 

6.       Creation of Affordable Senior Housing

a.       Locations

b.       Zoning

c.       Funding

d.       Local Preference

 

 

MassHousing give town extension to 11/18 to submit comments

Email from Sarah Raposa today announcing that MassHousing gave town an extension to respond to the Mega-B –

Rendering

Memorandum

To:       Town Officials, Boards and Commissions

From:   Sarah Raposa, Town Planner

Date:    September 26, 2016

Re:       Medfield Meadows 40B –

New Deadline for Municipal Comment Letter

 

Following up on my memo from 9/22/16:

 

MassHousing has extended the Town’s Municipal Comment Letter deadline.  The new deadline for submitting Town comments is no later than Friday, November 18, 2016.

 

Please inform us of any issues that have been raised or are anticipated in the review of this application and have preliminary comments ready by Friday, October 7th so that they can be compiled in advance of the Board of Selectmen’s meeting on Tuesday, October 18th when the developers are presenting their application.

 

We will then review comments and formalize the comment letter by November 10th, in advance of the Selectmen’s meeting on November 15th.

 

 

Sarah Raposa, AICP

Town Planner
459 Main Street
Medfield, MA  02052

Info for Mega-B site visit

Email this morning from Sarah Raposa, Town Planner –

Rendering

Memorandum

To:       Town Officials, Boards and Commissions

From:   Sarah Raposa, Town Planner

 

Date:    September 22, 2016

 

Re:       Medfield Meadows 40B –

MassHousing Site Visit Scheduled for 9/28/16 at 10 am

 

On September 20, 2016 the Town of Medfield received notice that MassHousing is currently reviewing an application for Site Approval submitted by Medfield Meadows, LLC (the “Applicant”).

 

The proposed development will consist of 200 rental units on a 6.24 acre site located at 39, 41, and 49 Dale Street. Of the 200 units, 50 will be made available to low to moderate-income residents.

 

Should MassHousing deem the conceptual design appropriate for the site, the Applicant is then allowed to submit a formal comprehensive permit application to the Medfield Zoning Board of Appeals for this project.

 

As part of its review, MassHousing will conduct a site visit, which Local Boards[1] may attend. The site visit for Medfield Meadows has been scheduled for Wednesday, September 28th at 10 a.m. Please meet at the project location (at or near 39, 41, 49 Dale Street).

 

A municipality has an opportunity to submit comments to the agency within 30 days.  The public may also wish to submit comments.  The Town has requested an extension of this deadline to MassHousing which is under review.  The current deadline for comments is no later than October 20, 2016.

 

Departmental or local board comments should be submitted to me by Friday, October 7th so that they can be compiled in advance of the Board of Selectmen’s meeting on Tuesday, October 18th when the developers are presenting their application. Please inform us of any issues that have been raised or are anticipated in the review of this application.

 

[1] Local Board – means any local board or official, including, but not limited to any board of survey; board of health; planning board; conservation commission; historical commission; water, sewer, or other commission or district; fire, police, traffic, or other department; building inspector or similar official or board; city council or board of selectmen.  All boards, regardless of their geographical jurisdiction or their source of authority (that is, including boards created by special acts of the legislature or by other legislative action) shall be deemed Local Boards if they perform functions usually performed by locally created boards.

 

 

Sarah Raposa, AICP

Town Planner
459 Main Street
Medfield, MA  02052
(508) 906-3027

40B dates & 9/26 agenda

This sheet was handed out at the Tuesday meeting of the selectmen –

Upcoming 40B related events PROPOSED, dates subject to change Hospital Road: • Monday, October 3 - Applicants present to PB (~8 pm, Town Hall) • Tuesday, October 4 - Applicants present to Bos (time, Town Hall) • Thursday, October 13 - ZBA public hearing #1 (7:30 pm, Town Hall) Dale Street: • Wednesday, September 28 - MHP site visit (10 am, Dale St) • Tuesday, October 18 - Applicants present to BoS (time, Auditorium) Other: • Monday, September 26, 2016 - BoS meeting with Affordable Housing Committee, Board of Assessors, Building Inspector, Housing Authority, Medfield State Hospital Master Planning Committee, Planning Board, Town Wide Master Plan Steering Committee (7:30 pm, Town Hall) • Monday, October 17 - Housing Production Plan public meeting to PB & Bos (8 pm, Town Hall)

Mike Sullivan’s proposed agenda for the September 26 meeting, received this afternoon (I would add a #7, naming Mike as the person responsible to execute on the plan that is created):


Agenda for September 26th Selectmen’s Meeting Affordable Housing Workshop
Welcome by Mark Fisher, Chairman of Board of Selectman and Introductions
This meeting is being recorded. We will begin by observing a moment of appreciation for our Troops serving in the Mideast and around the world.

  1. Presentation on Housing Production Plan and Strategies by Roberta Cameron, consultant from Community Opportunities Group (COG)
  2. Affordable Housing Discussion
    1. Adoption of Housing Production Plan
      1. Approval by Planning Board
      2. Approval by Board of Selectmen
      3. Submission to and approval by State
    2. Implementation of Housing Production Plan
      1. Selection of locations for future 40B housing developments
      2. Determination of developers (Town (LIP), non-profit, for-profit) and types of housing
      3. Bidding, sale and/ or transfer (disposition) of land
      4. Details of financing methods
      5. Request for site approval from Mass Housing
      6. Application to Zoning Board of Appeal for Comprehensive Permit
      7. Appeals Period
      8. Bidding for design, construction, site work, landscaping, etc.
      9. Construction
      10. Lottery and/or marketing of units and determination of management plan
    3. Construction of Additional units at Tilden Village
      1. Transfer of Land and Project Approval from State (which Agencies)
      2. Project Funding
      3. Selection of Project Manager and Architect
      4. Design, Bidding and Construction (Public construction process)
      5. Tenant Selection
    4. Update on Hospital Road 40B project
      1. Status
      2. Options
    5. Update on Dale/North Meadows 40B project
      1. Status
      2. Options
    6. Creation of Affordable Senior Housing
      1. Locations
      2. Zoning
      3. Funding
      4. Local Preference

Mega-B site visit 9/28 at 10AM

"' ••. ~OUSlNG Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency One Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02108 TEL: 617.854.1000 I FAX:617.854.1091 VP: 866.758.1435 www.masshousing.com September 20, 2016 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL AND E-MAIL Mark Fisher, Chairman Medfield Board of Selectmen 459 Main Street Medfield MA 02052 Re: Medfield Meadows MHIDNo. 873 Dear Mr. Fisher: MassHousing is currently reviewing an application for Site Approval submitted by Medfield Meadows, LLC (The Applicant). The above-captioned proposed development will consist of200 rental units on a 6.24 acre site located at 39, 41, and 49 Dale Street in Medfield, MA. Of the 200 units, 50 will be made available to low to moderate-income residents. The site approval process is offered to project sponsors who intend to apply for a comprehensive permit under Chapter 40B. MassHousing's review involves an evaluation of the site, the design concept, the financial feasibility of the proposal, and the appropriateness of the proposal in relation to local housing needs and strategies. As part of our review, we are soliciting comments from the local community and we would appreciate your input. You also may wish to include in your response, issues or concerns raised by other town boards, officials or other interested parties. Pursuant to the Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 40B regulations (760 CMR 56.00) your comments may include information regarding municipal actions previously taken to meet affordable housing needs such as inclusionary zoning, multifamily districts adopted under G .L. c.40A and overlay districts adopted under G.L. c.40R. Your comments will be considered as part of our review. We have been informed by Medfield Meadows, LLC that the Town has received a copy of the application and plans for Medfield Meadows. Please inform us of any issues that have been raised or are anticipated in the Town's review of this application. We request that you submit your comments to this office within 30 days so we may process this application in a timely marmer. During the course of its review, MassHousing will conduct a site visit, which Local Boards, as defined in 760 CMR 56.02, may attend. The site visit for Medfield Meadows has been scheduled for Wednesday, September 281 h at 10 a.m. Please notify me promptly if any representatives of Charles D. Baker, Governor I Michael 1 Dirrane, Chairman I Timothy C. Sullivan, Executive Director I Thomas R. Gleason, Executive Director Emeritus Karyn E. Polito, Lt. Governor Ping Yin Chai, Vice Chair Karen E. Kelleher, Deputy Director your office or if other Local Boards plan to attend the scheduled site visit. Please note that if and when an application is submitted for a comprehensive permit, assistance is available to Medfield Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) to review the permit application. The Massachusetts Housing Partnership's (MHP) Ch. 40B Technical Assistance Program administers grants to municipalities for up to $15,000 to engage qualified third-party consultants to work with the town's ZBA in reviewing the Chapter 40B proposal. For more information about MHP's technical assistance grant visit MHP's web site, www.mhp.net/40B or e-mail MHP at pcrean@mhp.net If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to telephone me at ( 617) 854-1201. Thank you for your assistance. J sica L. Malcolm 40B Specialist cc: Sarah L. Raposa, AICP, Town Planner (via e-mail sraposa@medfield.net) Michael J. Sullivan, Town Administrator (via e-mail msullivan@medfield.net) 220160920-masshousing-town-notice-medfield_page_2

Mega-B site approval

Email this afternoon to the selectmen –

Rendering

Dale Street 40B Site Approval Application

We have received notification and a copy of the Medfield Meadows: 40B Site Approval Application (Dale Street and North Meadows).

 

http://www.town.medfield.net/index.cfm/page/Proposed-Medfield-Meadows-40B-Project-(Dale-St)/pid/30402

 

Kristine Trierweiler

Assistant Town Administrator
Town of Medfield

459 Main Street
Medfield, MA 02052

508 906 3011 phone

508 359-6182 fax

Meeting(s) on affordable housing

40b

This morning, Chris McCue offered to help with the upcoming 9/26 meeting about affordable housing (since I had advocated for a meeting to discuss affordable housing issues).  But since I had not organized, nor planned the 9/26 meeting (I only learned about it when I went to the last Selectmen meeting), I forwarded Chris’ offer to the town administration.  I received this response from Kristine Trierweiler –


The meeting on 9/26 was for town boards to discuss affordable housing with the BOS. I believe that is separate from a town wide forum on 40B. Mike had been working with Mark on that. 

Given that, Chris is correct that people will be attending the working session on 9/26 as well so I will touch base with Mark/Mike on scheduling the 40B meeting similar to the one we held when Parc was first proposed. 

Kristine


 

I apologize if my lack of information caused me to jump to conclusions that mislead anyone about that 9/26 meeting.  I had actually mistakenly believed that the 9/26 meeting was intended as the public forum on 40B and affordable housing that I had envisioned, but apparently it is not – although the public meeting may now be getting arranged.  It looks like we may be getting two separate meetings:

  • one targeted at town boards, discussing the issues, and
  • one targeted at the public, seeking to inform and seek input, I imagine.

Mega-B meeting notes

Rendering

This morning Sarah Raposa circulated her notes of a meeting that took place yesterday.


Town of Medfield                             Developer Team
Sarah Raposa    Town Planner      Patrick Corrigan    Medfield Meadows LLC
William Kingsbury    Fire Chief    Ronald Tiberi, PE    Civil Engineer
Leslee Willitts    Conservation      Patrick Kelly    RQC Developer
John G. Naff    Building Comm.    John Kelly    Medfield Meadows LLC/RQC LLC Devel.
Maurice Goulet    DPW Director    John Winslow    Winslow Architects Inc
Mark G. Cerel    Town Counsel      Geoff Engler    SEB LLC (40B Consultant)
Yvonne Remillard    Assessor       Moira Cronin    SEB LLC (40B Consultant)
Nancy Bennotti   Bd of Health     Ardi Rappi    Cheney Engineering Co
Michael J. Sullivan    Town Administrator
Kristine Trierweiler    Asst. Town Administrator
Bob Meaney    Police Chief
Jeff Marsden    Supt. of Schools
E. Clarke    Observing

M. Larkin     Observing
September 8, 2016
10 – 11 am

Introductions
40B Consultant Geoff Engler outlined the purpose of the meeting: To give the Town an overview of the components of the application (design, engineering, etc.). They expect revisions based on comments, suggestions, peer review over the coming months. He indicated that the applicants are open to dialogue.

Architect John Winslow (33 yrs experience, also was involved in the Leland Farms 40B project in Sherborn) admitted that the project is not medium density as he originally stated in August and is in fact high density. He further explained that he was asked by the developers to prepare a plan to show 200 units on the site. He acknowledged that the site as designed does not match the surrounding buildings. The site requires parking underneath both buildings and 4-6 stories. The “north” building will have 110 units and the “south” building will have 90 units (SR note: referred to north and south because at this section of Rt 27/North Meadows, the road slightly curves creating a north/south perspective rather than an east/west perspective). The north side is relatively flat except for a steep slope towards the DPW and the south side is a former gravel pit. He said the design of the building respond to the site conditions; the buildings step from 3 to 5 levels away from the street. The five story sections are adjacent to John Crowder and Joseph Pace Roads. There is a possibility of adding rooftop terraces. The underground parking is one level under the left wing of Building 1 (north) and two levels under the middle and right wing of Building 1. The underground parking is two levels under Building 2 (south). Building 1 has access and egress to North Meadows, egress only from the underground parking to North Meadows, and access and egress to Dale Street.  He said they tried to create diversity in massing by varying color and massing, but said it was not well shown on the plans. The south building, Building 2, is four stories with two levels of underground parking. There is one access/egress ramp to Dale Street. They are open to changing access point to North Meadows. This site requires some fill for the recreation area and circular driveway. They stayed away from the isolated wetlands.
Unit and Bedroom count:
1 bedroom    43        Total units    200
2 bedroom    126        Total Bedrooms    388
3 bedroom    31
•    Unit/bedroom count designed to meet market demands with 9’ ceilings with trim (they want the units to be “nice”)
•    The entire project will be privately financed, no public subsidies
•    25% affordable and 75% market rate rentals
•    Up to 80% AMI is affordable to those earning approximately $40-65k/year
•    Market rate rents are approximately $250/sf:
o    1 BR ~ 750 sf
o    2 BR ~ 100 sf
o    3 BR ~ 1300 sf
•    They would consider using a new program and adding additional middle tier, beyond the 25%, for those earning 80-120% AMI (“workforce housing”)
o    maybe 15-20 units
o    administered similarly to the affordable units with income eligibility requirements
•    The project will meet all DEP, environmental, stormwater, building codes, fire protection codes.
•    The site requires additional testing but they believe the soils are adequate for recharge (given previous use as a sand pit). They will use a combination of groundwater recharge systems and detention ponds. The will meet EPA/DEP requirements. More civil work is forthcoming.
•    The stormwater management plans are independent on each side of the proposal and not sharing stormwater devices.
•    The State does not require a fully engineered plan set but they will demonstrate that the stormwater system will work. The Town of Medfield may hire peer engineering reviewers and the applicants will pay for it.
•    Shadow studies will be produced (DPW solar panels and single family dwellings in Allendale)
•    Vanasse & Associates is doing the traffic studies. They will coordinate with Chief Meaney on dates, times and locations as there are often local events that may skew data collection.
•    Parking spaces proposed: 321. They propose 1.6 parking spaces per unit. The ratio proposed is consistent with other suburban areas and is adequate in their experience.
o    There is no nearby mass transportation (Walpole, Needham)
•    Spaces will be designated as tenant or visitor as no parking on the street will be allowed.
•    Cerel asked if the clients are committed to this sized project. J. Kelly replied that the investment return dictates the size of the project to finance, build, and maintain.
•    They will make a presentation to the Selectmen at a public meeting during the comments period.
o    Use auditorium
•    The project is out of scale and has already created shockwaves within the community. They expect this and have been through similar situations but they are open to the path of least resistance.
•    Why such a complete plan if open to negotiate? They wanted to have a thoughtful, complete plan so there is something to react to. They aren’t taking a “take it or leave it” approach but they wanted to have a lot of work done for their application to the state (which is expected to be submitted very soon). Winslow said that we can’t have specific conversations without specific plans. He said that preparing plans is easier with computers so what looks like a lot of work are easier to produce. He added that “out of scale isn’t all evil”
•    Raposa is the contact person for anything to do with the comprehensive permit application but Sullivan is the contact person for the Board of Selectmen and negotiations. Engler is the contact person for the developers.
•    Goulet added issues such as safety. Lighting, snow removal and storage, impacts from the operation of the DPW, water, wastewater, etc. should be address. They will have private trash removal
•    Chief Kingsbury is highly concerned about fire-fighting issues with the height of the garage/clearance of the fire truck and access around the buildings. His apparatuses are over 10’ tall and he has a 75’ aerial ladder.
•    Chief Meaney explained the 109 traffic issues and impacts to Frairy and Dale. He would anticipate more computer traffic with the number of market rate units proposed. He wondered if they proposed some sort of connection to access one side from the other. There are the same amenities on either side and they are self-contained buildings.
•    Sullivan asked about the lack of recreational space and if they anticipated not a lot of children. It’s not well shown but there are spaces for playgrounds and bbqs. Family units are dispersed throughout the buildings.
•    Will there be on-site security? They will have a professional management company but not security for high level service for their tenants. No live-in manager.
•    Marsden asked about projections on school kids and requested that a fiscal impact analysis be submitted.
•    They anticipate a phased development plan which is not well defined though construction phases would be dovetailed.
•    Rental developers are capped at a 10% profit margin. Pro forma with operating and development budgets will be submitted.
•    They anticipate submittal to the state very soon

BoS 9/6

Below is the official agenda, received this afternoon.  I am also interested in having a discussion about how the town can respond to the proposed 40B on Dale Street.

TOWN OF MEDFIELD POSTED: MEETING TOWN CLERK NOTICE 1QltN Of HEOfELO. l'A . . St.> .-  A () 2lt . POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF M.G.L. cJl~TER 39 SEC1fR~ 23A AS AMENDED. OffC~ 8[t.R

CPA for affordable housing

This article is from my EfficientGov.com newsletter – see it on-line here

The Massachusetts Community Preservation Act (CPA) in my analysis is all about the town being smart enough to pick up the matching state monies, because we know that in the future we will be spending  on the three CPA categories: affordable housing, historic preservation, and open spaces/recreation.

Medfield is currently getting a double whammy, because (1) our residents are paying in to the state the funds that are distributed to other towns, but (2) we just are not sharing any of the state CPA matching monies that others are getting.  Medway gets about a 40% state match.

 

budget-bowl of money

Community Preservation Funds & Affordable Housing

See how some Massachusetts’ towns are managing community preservation funds for affordable housing projects and requests.

In Massachusetts towns that have adopted the state’s Community Preservation Act, appointed committees make recommendations to town councils on how to spend the money. The community preservation funds are often used for open space, historic preservation or recreation projects, but they can also be applied to community housing projects.

Community housing is defined in the law as “low and moderate income housing for individuals and families, including low or moderate income senior housing.”

Gatehouse Media reporters took a close look at how several Massachusetts towns are handling their community preservation spending. While a lot of the money is dedicated to open spaces and historic preservation of town properties, some affordable housing projects are funded. For example, the town of Chelmsford has spent $2.1 million in community preservation funds on the 116-unit Chelmsford Woods complex, a property of the Chelmsford Housing Authority.

The town of Belmont, west of Boston, and two current affordable housing projects offer a dichotomy in how effective community preservation funds are for improving or increasing affordable housing.

In the first case, Belmont Village, 25 four-family buildings with 100 total units, had outdated electrical wiring with only one outlet per room. Most people were using extension cords, according to Margaret Velie, chairwoman of the Belmont Community Preservation Committee.

Belmont Village, originally built in 1950, is a state-aided housing project of the Belmont Housing Authority that is home to families and veterans. There are 50 two-bedroom and 50 three-bedroom apartments. Belmont earmarked more than $522,000 in its community preservation funding in 2015. Interior wiring upgrades, and additional electrical outlets, are being completed this summer.

According to Gatehouse Media, the town also previously set aside $375,000 of community preservation funds for a first-time homeowners assistance program to procure three more affordable housing units. But the program has not been very effective. A lottery gave three residents earning below 80 percent of median average income a chance to use a portion of the earmark to help them purchase condominiums, in exchange for the three properties becoming part of the housing authority’s affordable housing portfolio.

According to Velie, all three residents have not been able to find affordable condos in the Belmont housing market.

How are Community Preservation Funding Requests Made?

Local groups and town agencies are typically allowed to seek community preservation funds. But it’s usually a town committee or official working with a community organization making the request, Evan Belansky, director of community development in Chelmsford, told Gatehouse Media.

Chelmsford Housing Authority requests come through the authority’s executive director, for example. Small projects may also receive community preservation funding through capital improvements cycles.

But there are also ways to get approved without having to make a request through the community preservation committee and then have it recommended and approved at a town meeting.

“What we do in Chelmsford over the years, is we have learned some lessons on how to expedite the process,” Belansky said. “For example, we have an open space and recreation account, whereby the community preservation committee can approve smaller-dollar figure projects, so it is direct, without town meeting approval.”

Read the original story on the Arlington Advocate website.

Note in other states, there is similar funding for historic preservation designations. But, the historic preservation designation can play the double agent in local affordable housing battles, as EfficientGov has reported on previously.

http://efficientgov.com/blog/2016/02/18/historic-preservationist-rails-against-designation-opponents/embed/#?secret=nqpDAZKlWk