Author Archives: Select Board member Osler "Pete" Peterson

Rosebay update

Yesterday I had an informative telephone call from Brian McMillin, the developer of Rosebay, about my prior blog post wherein I stated that he preferred to make design changes to the project within the ZBA comprehensive permit process, and then in response to my outreach to her for a status update on the ad hoc group, an emailed MEMO from Town Planner, Sarah Raposa.

  • Brian outlined for me the many project changes that he had made to accommodate the concerns expressed by the town and the ad hoc group with whom he meet over concerns about the size and scale of the design.
  • Sarah shared her 7/22/2019 MEMO to the Board of Selectmen about the work of the Rosebay Ad Hoc Design Review Group (copy attached below).

Contrary to my prior understanding, I learned that the ad hoc group had made substantial progress in getting changes made to the design, which are enumerated in the MEMO.  I also learned from Brain McMillin that none of my own personal suggestions from having studied the plans this week for how to make it a two story project would work, if it is going to remain a 45 unit project.

This is the conclusion stated in the MEMO:

  • Conclusion:  . . . The group has worked to openly review the design and make recommendations that allowed the developer to put forward the best version of their proposal, and conversely Newgate has been open to the recommendations suggested and have made improvements to their proposed development.

Finally, I note that our fellow residents who so kindly served on this ad hoc group, Greg Sullivan, Todd Trehubenko, and Jim Brand, have tremendous professional experience in the real estate development and design area, so our town got truly first rate, high quality professional input in this process.

Town of Medfield 459 Main Street Medfield, MA 02052 (508) 906-3027 Memorandum To: Board of Selectmen From: Sarah Raposa, Town Planner Date: July 22, 2019 Re: Rosebay Ad Hoc Design Review Group Recommendation In August 2018 DHCD and the Town of Medfield received an application for a 45- unit senior rental development called “Rosebay at Medfield” submitted by Newgate Housing LLC / Brian McMillin. The Board of Selectmen were specific in their municipal comment letter in that the Board is in support of the concept (providing affordable senior rental units as articulated in both the 2016 Housing Production Plan and the Medfield Affordable Housing Trust’s Action Plan) but may opt to not support the project because of the current design and recommend that the ZBA deny the project, as is their right due to the Town’s position in Safe Harbor. Despite the process being a traditional 40B, the Developer agreed to meet, informally, with a few members of town boards that may be helpful in working through some of the massing, height, and bulk issues associated with the proposal. Rosebay Ad Hoc Design Group:  Greg Sullivan Planning Board  Brian McMillin NewGate Housing LLC  Jim Brand AHT/PB Assoc.  Mark Major VMY Architects LLC  Todd Trehubenko AHT  James Koningisor Project Manager  Sarah Raposa Town Planner  Courtney Starling COG Meeting #1 (January 10, 2019): In assessing the major factors influencing the development; the size of the lot, the number of units proposed by the developer, elevator requirements, and the desire to utilize rooftop mechanical systems while maintaining a proportionate roofline, the group felt that that it would be difficult to substantially reduce the massing without reducing unit count. The group challenged Newgate to evaluate additional design changes that might reduce impact. These included recommendations to reduce roof pitch, removal of even taller roof elements, increasing setbacks from road and abutters, continuing character of street frontage with a stone wall, trees and other vegetation, aspects of lighting, and other related changes. The group suggested the applicant create a contextual elevation or graphic showing adjacent buildings, providing neighborhood context, and a site plan showing all site-specific elements such as trees, other vegetation and landscape elements, lighting levels, and their proposed pedestrian path through the site. The Newgate team was proactively engaged and open to the comments of the group. Town of Medfield 459 Main Street Medfield, MA 02052 (508) 906-3027 Meeting #2 (May 2, 2019): The Newgate team presented revised plans, elevations and neighborhood context graphics that included design changes that addressed in actuality or the spirit of the comments of the Design Review Group. The following changes and clarifications were made to the proposal: 1. The front setback from Pound Street was revised from 30.5’ to 60.4’. This is twice the required setback in the RU zoning district. 2. The building height was reduced by 10’ to 40’. The zoning bylaw allows a height up to 35’ for multifamily use in the RU district so this would be a 5’ waiver request. 3. The gross building area was reduced by more than 2,000 square feet (from 50,670 sf to 48,524 sf). 4. The distance to neighboring buildings is shown on the revised site plan indicating compliance with the side setback requirements in the RU zoning district. 5. The walking path from Pound Street to the High School/Middle School is proposed as stone dust. 6. An 8’ privacy fence is proposed between walking path and the adjacent historic property at 58 Pound Street. 7. As requested, the Developer submitted landscaping and lighting plans. The landscaping plan provides context on the preservation of existing vegetation and proposed additional screening. The lighting plan confirms no unnecessary light-spillage over the property line. 8. Additional handicapped parking spaces were provided based on comments from the Fire Department. 9. An outdoor trash enclosure was eliminated from the plan because this building has interior trash and recycling facilities on each floor. 10. Certain exterior architectural elements were added or enhanced to improve the appearance of the building, maintain visual interest, and create character on the building’s elevations. 11. Interior changes include a revised layout of the first floor front and rear entries, lobby area, and amenity spaces to improve the flow of foot traffic and to provide for flow through from front entrance to rear entrance; as well as corrected unit plans. The developer provided additional renderings that provided context with the neighborhood. This area is transitional and includes single family dwellings, multi-family dwellings and institutional structures (high school/middle school complex). The viewpoint looking down Pound Street from South Street still reflects a significant development, but is an improvement considering the previous building. From the other direction, the building is closely abutted to Tilden Village. Conclusion: The Ad Hoc Design Review Group recognizes the position decision that the Board of Selectmen need to make relative to this project, senior affordable housing, and the impacted neighborhood. The group has worked to openly review the design and make recommendations that allowed the developer to put forward the best version of their proposal, and conversely Newgate has been open to the recommendations suggested and have made improvements to their proposed development. We appreciate the BoS taking this into consideration as they assess the current design as this moves forward with the Zoning Board of Appeals process.20190722-Memo_re Rosebay ad hoc design group 07-22-19_Page_2

 

MMA analysis of state budget

ALERT TODAY FROM THE MASSACHUSETTS MUNICIPAL ASSOCIATION ABOUT THE BUDGET –

We will get more that was originally proposed by either the Governor, the House or the Senate.

MMA-3

 

LEGISLATURE’S CONFERENCE COMMITTEE RELEASES FISCAL 2020 STATE BUDGET WITH MORE FUNDING FOR MANY LOCAL AID ACCOUNTS

 

HOUSE AND SENATE INCREASE KEY EDUCATION AND MUNICIPAL AID ACCOUNTS BY $128M ABOVE THE ORIGINAL BUDGET FILED IN JANUARY

 

PLEASE CONTACT THE GOVERNOR TODAY TO SUPPORT LOCAL AID FUNDING AND KEY MUNICIPAL ISSUES

 

July 22, 2019

 

Dear Osler Peterson,

 

On Sunday evening, July 21, the fiscal 2020 state budget conference committee that has been meeting since early June released H. 4000, the House-Senate compromise budget bill that is expected to be approved later today (Monday, July 22) by the Legislature.

 

Funding levels for many municipal and school aid accounts are higher in the Legislature’s final budget than in the recommendation (H. 1) filed by the Governor in January, providing $128 million more for key municipal and education programs. The Governor has 10 days to review the budget bill and make decisions on what to approve and what to veto or send back with proposed changes. Legislators will then have until the end of formal sessions in this calendar year (in November) to consider whether to accept or override those changes.

 

Please call the Governor’s office and ask that he approve the municipal and school aid accounts in the Legislature’s budget bill, including those funding levels that are higher than what he recommended in January, when the outlook for state finances was less positive than it is today.

 

You can find the Chapter 70 and UGGA amounts for your community in Section 3 of H. 4000, beginning on page 271 of the printed version of the budget, or on page 279 of the downloadable PDF.

 

Click Here for a Link to the Legislature’s Budget

 

Later this week, the Division of Local Services will notify communities of their final Cherry Sheet receipts and assessments. When available, Cherry Sheets will be posted on DLS’s website.

 

Click Here for a Link to the Division of Local Services Final Cherry Sheet

 

Here is a summary of the key priorities and local aid increases for cities and towns:

 

Unrestricted General Government Aid (UGGA)

In a continuing victory for cities and towns, H. 4000 appropriates $1.129 billion for the Unrestricted General Government Aid (UGGA) account, an increase of $29.7 million over the fiscal 2019 level of funding. The 2.7 percent increase reflects the policy of increasing general municipal aid at the rate of growth in state tax collections reflected in the consensus tax forecast. This revenue sharing policy has been adopted by the Governor and the House and Senate since fiscal 2016, and is a key priority of the MMA’s.

 

Chapter 70 School Aid and Local Contributions

In a major step forward for many communities, H. 4000 appropriates $5.176 billion for Chapter 70 school aid (7061-0008 and section 3). This is a $281 million increase over the current fiscal 2019 funding level. This will fund the basic requirements of Chapter 70 education aid, and makes progress by more aggressively implementing the recommendations of the Foundation Budget Review Commission, including higher funding for health insurance and special education costs, and significant increases in funding for communities with a high number of economically disadvantaged students. The budget continues to fund the target share provisions for those communities where the local contribution exceeds the target share level, and funds minimum aid at $30 per student. This Legislature’s budget provides a Chapter 70 increase of $68M above the amount originally proposed by the Governor in January. The community and district Chapter 70 funding levels match the distribution numbers passed in the Senate budget in May. We recognize that most communities will continue to remain minimum-aid-only districts, in spite of this impressive and appreciated statewide Chapter 70 increase, and the MMA will continue to prioritize higher minimum aid funding going forward.

 

  1. 4000 also supplements Chapter 70 by providing $10.5 million for a reserve fund to provide assistance to communities impacted by changes in how low-income students are counted. This amount is not included in the section 3 Chapter 70 distribution, and the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) will distribute these funds to communities early in the school year, with the Legislature stating their intent that those districts that received over $500K under this program in fiscal 2019 should receive similar levels in fiscal 2020.

 

Special Education Circuit Breaker

In a significant win for cities and towns, H. 4000 fully funds the Special Education Circuit Breaker Program at $345 million. This is the program through which the state provides support for services provided to high-cost special education students. This is critically important, and represents a $25.7 million increase above last year’s general appropriations act. The Governor had proposed level-funding, and legislators in both branches proposed increases intended to move toward full funding. The final version of the budget matches the Senate’s funding level.

 

Charter School Impact Mitigation Payments

  1. 4000 appropriates $115 million for Charter School Impact Mitigation Payments, a $25 million increase over the current year. This is a big step forward in terms of overall funding, and is certainly appreciated, although the program remains significantly underfunded and charter school finance remains a major problem for many cities and towns. Winning full funding for this program and overhauling the existing charter finance scheme remains a top priority for MMA. Each year, dozens of cities and towns lose more funds to charter schools than they receive in new Chapter 70 funding, making them “net negative aid” communities.

 

Cities and towns will need to review their final Cherry Sheets to determine how much of the mitigation payment funding they will receive. The Legislature’s budget makes several changes to the overall program. First, they change the current 6-year reimbursement program (100-25-25-25-25-25) to a 3-year framework (100-60-40), apparently keeping the current cost-based approach, instead of moving to a number-of-students approach as proposed by the governor (MMA strongly supports the cost-based method). Second, they include a $7.5 million allocation to those communities whose net charter school tuition costs exceed 9% of net school spending AND whose Chapter 70 aid is a lower percentage of their foundation budget than the statewide average. Third, they include a $7.5 million allocation to be distributed by DESE to communities who have experienced high and sustained growth in charter school enrollments.

 

Again, it will be necessary to review final Cherry Sheet numbers to see how H. 4000 funds each district’s charter school mitigation needs.

 

Regional School District Student Transportation

  1. 4000 appropriates of $75.9 million to reimburse regional school districts for a portion of the cost of transporting students. This is a $7 million increase over fiscal 2019, and gets closer to the full funding target of $90 million.

 

Rural School Aid

The Legislature’s budget includes a $2.5 million account to provide one-time funding for rural schools, many of which are struggling with fixed costs and declining enrollment. H. 4000 includes language that would require DESE to make recommendations for future funding in fiscal 2021.

 

McKinney-Vento Homeless Student Transportation

  1. 4000 appropriates $11.1 million for this account to reimburse municipalities and school districts for a portion of the cost of transporting homeless students as required under state and federal rules. This is an increase of $2 million over the fiscal 2019 appropriation.

 

Payment in Lieu of Taxes on State-owned Land

  1. 4000 appropriates $30 million to pay a portion of the payment-in-lieu-of taxes amount due to cities and towns to offset the property tax exemption for state-owned land. This is a $1.5 million increase over fiscal 2019, although some communities will still experience challenges due to changing valuations by the state.

 

Shannon Anti-Gang Grant Program

  1. 4000 appropriates $11 million for the highly effective and valuable Shannon Anti-Gang Grant Program that has helped cities and towns respond to and suppress gang-related activities, a $3 million increase over the current year.

 

Community Preservation Act

The Legislature’s final budget increases recording fees at the Registry of Deeds to raise revenues for the Community Preservation Act (CPA) Trust Fund. This would provide an estimated $36 million in new funds to more than double the base percentage match for all 175 CPA cities and towns beginning in November 2020. In addition, H. 4000 would set aside up to $20 million from the fiscal 2019 budget surplus (if any) to supplement the matching funds that will be distributed in the fall of 2019.

 

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact MMA Legislative Director John Robertson at 617-426-7272 ext. 122 or jrobertson@mma.org.

 

Please Contact Gov. Baker and Ask Him to Approve the Legislature’s Local Aid Increases as Described Above.

 

Thank you very much!

Rosebay filed with ZBA

Rosebay-comphensive permit appl

See the full comprehensive permit application the town website, via this link.

The Select Board will need to decide soon whether to invoke our safe harbor where the developer, Brian McMillin, has refused, to date, to reduce the mass and bulk of the proposed development.  We need to claim that safe harbor at the outset of the ZBA process, if we want to claim it at all.  I understand that Brian McMillin wants to deal with any such such size and bulk changes within the context of the comprehensive permit application process.  I expect that to be an agenda topic at our July 30 meeting.

1 in 10 patients harmed in the course of their medical care

medical errors-3

“More than 1 in 10 patients are harmed in the course of their medical care, and half of those injuries are preventable. Among the preventable errors, 12 percent led to a patient’s permanent disability or death, according to the report published Wednesday in The BMJ, a medical journal.”

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/medical-mistakes-harm-more-1-10-patients-many-are-preventable-n1030996

Likely changes coming as we switch to renewable energy

From the San Francisco chronicle –

Berkeley becomes first U.S. city to ban natural gas in new homes

Photo of Sarah Ravani

Berkeley has become the first city in the nation to ban the installation of natural gas lines in new homes.

The City Council on Tuesday night unanimously voted to ban gas from new low-rise residential buildings starting Jan. 1.

It’s not the first time Berkeley has passed pioneering health or environmental legislation. In 1977, Berkeley was the first in the country to ban smoking in restaurants and bars. In January the city banned single-use disposables, requiring restaurants to use to-go foodware that is compostable.

  • Unlimited Digital Access for 95¢
  • Read more articles like this by subscribing to the San Francisco Chronicle

The natural gas ordinance, introduced by Councilwoman Kate Harrison, requires all new single-family homes, town homes and small apartment buildings to have electric infrastructure. After its passage, Harrison thanked the community and her colleagues “for making Berkeley the first city in California and the United States to prohibit natural gas infrastructure in new buildings.”

“It’s an enormous issue,” Harrison told The Chronicle. “We need to really tackle this. When we think about pollution and climate-change issues, we tend to think about factories and cars, but all buildings are producing greenhouse gas.”

The city will include commercial buildings and larger residential structures as the state moves to develop regulations for those, officials said.

The ordinance allocates $273,341 per year for a two-year staff position in the Building and Safety Division within the city’s Department of Planning and Development. The employee will be responsible for implementing the ban.

Mayor Jesse Arreguín called the ordinance innovative and groundbreaking.

“I’m really proud to be on this City Council to adopt this groundbreaking ordinance. … We know that the climate crisis is deepening and is having cataclysmic impacts,” he said at the meeting. “Warmer temperatures and the year-round fire season … the melting of the polar ice caps, growing sea level rise, all these conditions prove that we are in real trouble and that we have to take bold action now.”

California Energy Commission Chairman David Hochschild, a Berkeley resident, also spoke at the meeting and said that 50 cities across the state, including San Francisco, are considering similar action and Berkeley would pave the way for future legislation.

“That is how change happens,” Hochschild said at the meeting. “Right now, in California, we have a big focus on cleaning up the building sector because there are more emissions coming from combustion natural gas in our buildings than our entire state power plant fleet.”

Office hours this Friday

office hours sign

Selectman Office Hours will be this Friday, July 19

I hold regular monthly office hours at The Center, usually on the first Friday of every month from 9:00 to 10:00 AM – however, for July, due to The Center being closed on the 4th, the office hours will be Friday, July 19.

Residents are welcome to stop by to talk in person about any town matters.

Residents can also have coffee and see the Council on Aging in action (a vibrant organization with lots going on). Peterson can be reached via 508-359-9190 or his blog about Medfield matters <https://medfield02052.wordpress.com>/, where any schedule changes will be posted

Office hours will be 7/19

office hours sign

Selectman Office Hours will be a week from Friday, July 19

I hold regular monthly office hours at The Center, usually on the first Friday of every month from 9:00 to 10:00 AM – however, for July, due to The Center being closed on the 4th, the office hours will be Friday, July 19.

Residents are welcome to stop by to talk in person about any town matters.

Residents can also have coffee and see the Council on Aging in action (a vibrant organization with lots going on). Peterson can be reached via 508-359-9190 or his blog about Medfield matters <https://medfield02052.wordpress.com>/, where any schedule changes will be posted

 

MSH stories

kafe

Medfield State Hospital stories

An update from the MAPC and CAM (Cultural Alliance of Medfield) regarding their upcoming “Let’s Talk” event on July 11, 2019 at the Zullo Gallery, from the MAPC website:

MAPC (Metropolitan Area Planning Council) is providing technical assistance to the Town of Medfield to facilitate the activation of the Medfield State Hospital campus with place-making activities that will set the course for future creative uses at the site. MAPC is working collaboratively with the Town of Medfield, the Cultural Alliance of Medfield, and an advisory committee composed of local residents and artists from Medfield and surrounding towns to plan a series of events starting on June 23, 2019 and continuing through May 2020.

The sprawling 661,000 square foot site of the former Medfield State Hospital sits on a hilltop overlooking the banks of the Charles River and boasts 39 historic buildings that are organized according to a Cottage Plan campus-style layout. Acquired by the Town of Medfield in 2014, the site is a unique and exciting terrain for creative reuse and renovation. The strategy will involve activating the church—which is slated to become the centerpiece of a future performing arts center—as well as the porches that grace the other buildings throughout the campus.

QUESTIONS?

For more information about the project, contact Hortense Gerardo, Artist in Residence, at hgerardo@mapc.org.

Age to buy tobacco in Norwood

vaping

Norwood – Age to Buy Nicotine

Instructive and horrifying to read the precatory clauses to Norwood’s latest tobacco regulations.  Thanks to Carol Read of the Town of Medfield’s Board of Health for sharing.  Makes one wonder why we as a society let these companies profit off selling their addictive nicotine to our kids.

****************************************************************

Regulation of the Norwood Board of Health

Restricting the Sale of Tobacco Products and Smoke Accessories

A. Statement of Purpose:
Whereas there exists conclusive evidence that tobacco smoking causes cancer, respiratory and cardiac diseases,
negative birth outcomes, irritations to the eyes, nose and throat1;

Whereas the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has concluded that nicotine is as addictive as
cocaine or heroin2 and the Surgeon General found that nicotine exposure during adolescence, a critical window
for brain development, may have lasting adverse consequences for brain development,3 and that it is addiction
to nicotine that keeps youth smoking past adolescence.4

Whereas a Federal District Court found that Phillip Morris, RJ Reynolds and other leading cigarette
manufacturers “spent billions of dollars every year on their marketing activities in order to encourage young
people to try and then continue purchasing their cigarette products in order to provide the replacement smokers
they need to survive” and that these companies were likely to continue targeting underage smokers5;

Whereas more than 80 percent of all adult smokers begin smoking before the age of 18, more than 90 percent
do so before leaving their teens, and more than 3.5 million middle and high school students smoke;6

Whereas 18.1 percent of current smokers aged <18 years reported that they usually directly purchased their
cigarettes from stores (i.e. convenience store, supermarket, or discount store) or gas stations, and among 11th
grade males this rate was nearly 30 percent ;7

Whereas the Institute of Medicine (IOM) concludes that raising the minimum age of legal access to tobacco
products to 21 will likely reduce tobacco initiation, particularly among adolescents 15 – 17, which would
improve health across the lifespan and save lives8.

Whereas cigars and cigarillos, can be sold in a single “dose;” enjoy a relatively low tax as compared to
cigarettes; are available in fruit, candy and alcohol flavors; and are popular among youth9;
1 Center for Disease Control and Prevention, (CDC) (2012), Health Effects of Cigarette Smoking Fact Sheet. Retrieved from:
http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistice/fact_sheets/health_effects/effects_cig_smoking/index. htm.
2 CDC (2010), How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Smoking-Attributable Disease. Retrieved
from: http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/2010/.
3 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2014. The Health Consequences of Smoking – 50 Years of Progress: A Report of
the Surgeon General. Atlanta: U.S. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and
Health, p. 122. Retrieved from: http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/ reports/ 50-years-of-progress/full-report.pdf.
4 Id. at Executive Summary p. 13. Retrieved from: http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/50-years-of-progress/execsummary.
pdf
5 United States v. Phillip Morris, Inc., RJ Reynolds Tobacco Co., et al., 449 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C. 2006) at Par. 3301 and Pp. 1605-07.
6 SAMHSA, Calculated based on data in 2011 National Survey on Drug Use and Health and U. S. Department of Health and Human
services (HHA).
7 CDC (2013) Youth Risk Behavior, Surveillance Summaries (MMWR 2014: 63 (No SS-04)). Retrieved from: http://www.cdc.gov.
8 IOM (Institute of Medicine) 2015. Public Health Implications of Raising the Minimum Age of Legal Access to Tobacco Products.
Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2015.
9 CDC (2009), Youth Risk Behavior, Surveillance Summaries (MMWR 2010: 59, 12, note 5). Retrieved from:
http:www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/ss/ss5905.pdf.
2

Whereas research shows that increased cigar prices significantly decreased the probability of male adolescent
cigar use and a 10% increase in cigar prices would reduce use by 3.4%10;

Whereas 59% of high school smokers in Massachusetts have tried flavor cigarettes or flavored cigars and 25.6%
of them are current flavored tobacco product users; 95.1 % of 12 – 17 year olds who smoked cigars reported
smoking cigar brands that were flavored;11

Whereas the Surgeon General found that exposure to tobacco marketing in stores and price discounting increase
youth smoking;12
Whereas the federal Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (FSPTCA), enacted in 2009,
prohibited candy- and fruit-flavored cigarettes,13 largely because these flavored products were marketed to
youth and young adults,14 and younger smokers were more likely to have tried these products than older
smokers15, neither federal nor Massachusetts laws restrict sales of flavored non-cigarette tobacco products, such
as cigars, cigarillos, smokeless tobacco, hookah tobacco, and electronic devices and the nicotine solutions used
in these devices;

Whereas the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Surgeon General have stated that flavored
tobacco products are considered to be “starter” products that help establish smoking habits that can lead to longterm
addiction;16

Whereas the U.S. Surgeon General recognized in his 2014 report that a complementary strategy to assist in
eradicating tobacco related death and disease is for local governments to ban categories of products from retail
sale;17
10 Ringel, J., Wasserman, J., & Andreyeva, T. (2005) Effects of Public Policy on Adolescents’ Cigar Use: Evidence from the National
Youth Tobacco Survey. American Journal of Public Health, 95(6), 995-998, doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2003.030411 and cited in Cigar,
Cigarillo and Little Cigar Use among Canadian Youth: Are We Underestimating the Magnitude of this Problem?, J. Prim. P. 2011,
Aug: 32(3-4):161-70. Retrieved from: http://www.nebi.nim.gov/pubmed/21809109.
11 Massachusetts Department of Public Health, 2015 Massachusetts Youth Health Survey (MYHS); Delneve CD et al., Tob Control,
March 2014: Preference for flavored cigar brands among youth, young adults and adults in the USA.
12 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2012. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the
Surgeon General. Atlanta: U.S. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and
Health, p. 508-530, http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/preventing-youth-tobacco-use/full-report.pdf.
13 21 U.S.C. § 387g.
14 Carpenter CM, Wayne GF, Pauly JL, et al. 2005. “New Cigarette Brands with Flavors that Appeal to Youth: Tobacco Marketing
Strategies.” Health Affairs. 24(6): 1601–1610; Lewis M and Wackowski O. 2006. “Dealing with an Innovative Industry: A Look at
Flavored Cigarettes Promoted by Mainstream Brands.” American Journal of Public Health. 96(2): 244–251; Connolly GN. 2004.
“Sweet and Spicy Flavours: New Brands for Minorities and Youth.” Tobacco Control. 13(3): 211–212; U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services. 2012. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: U.S.
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, p. 537,
http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/preventing-youth-tobacco-use/full-report.pdf.
15 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2012. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the
Surgeon General. Atlanta: U.S. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and
Health, p. 539, http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/preventing-youth-tobacco-use/full-report.pdf.
16
Food and Drug Administration. 2011. Fact Sheet: Flavored Tobacco Products,
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/TobaccoProducts/ProtectingKidsfromTobacco/FlavoredTobacco/UCM183214.pdf; U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services. 2012. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General.
Atlanta: U.S. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, p. 539,
http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/preventing-youth-tobacco-use/full-report.pdf.
17 See fn. 3 at p. 85.
3

Whereas the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has reported that the current use of electronic
cigarettes, a product sold in dozens of flavors that appeal to youth, among middle and high school students
tripled from 2013 to 2014;18

Whereas 5.8% of Massachusetts youth currently use e-cigarettes and 15.9% have tried them;19

Whereas the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection has classified liquid nicotine in any
amount as an “acutely hazardous waste”;20

Whereas in a lab analysis conducted by the FDA, electronic cigarette cartridges that were labeled as containing
no nicotine actually had low levels of nicotine present in all cartridges tested, except for one21;

Whereas according to the CDC’s youth risk behavior surveillance system, the percentage of high school
students in Massachusetts who reported the use of cigars within the past 30 days is 10.8% in 2013; 22

Whereas data from the National Youth Tobacco Survey indicate that more than two-fifths of U.S. middle and
high school smokers report using flavored little cigars or flavored cigarettes;23

Whereas the sale of tobacco products is incompatible with the mission of health care institutions because these
products are detrimental to the public health and their presence in health care institutions undermine efforts to
educate patients on the safe and effective use of medication, including cessation medication;

Whereas educational institutions sell tobacco products to a younger population, who is particularly at risk for
becoming smokers and such sale of tobacco products is incompatible with the mission of educational
institutions that educate a younger population about social, environmental and health risks and harms;

Whereas the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has held that “ . . . [t]he right to engage in business must
yield to the paramount right of government to protect the public health by any rational means”24.

Whereas data from the Norwood MetroWest Adolescent Health Survey showed 45% of Norwood High school
students have tried a vaping product and 31% currently use vaping products25.
18 Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. 2015. “Tobacco Use Among Middle and High School Students — United States, 2011–
2014,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) 64(14): 381–385;
19 Massachusetts Department of Public Health, 2015 Massachusetts Youth Health Survey (MYHS)
20 310 CMR 30.136
21 Food and Drug Administration, Summary of Results: Laboratory Analysis of Electronic Cigarettes Conducted by FDA, available at:
http://www.fda.gov/newsevents/publichealthfocus/ucm173146.htm.
22 See fn. 7.
23 King BA, Tynan MA, Dube SR, et al. 2013. “Flavored-Little-Cigar and Flavored-Cigarette Use Among U.S. Middle and High
School Students.” Journal of Adolescent Health. [Article in press], http://www.jahonline.org/article/S1054-139X%2813%2900415-
1/abstract.
24 Druzik et al v. Board of Health of Haverhill, 324 Mass.129 (1949).
25
MetroWest Adolescent Health Survey: Key Indicator Report (2018) Metrowest Health Foundation. Submitted by Education
Development Center, Inc.
4

Now, therefore it is the intention of the Norwood Board of Health to regulate the sale of tobacco products.

B. Authority:
This regulation is promulgated pursuant to the authority granted to the Norwood Board of Health by
Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 111, Section 31 which states “Boards of health may make reasonable
health regulations”.

C. Definitions:
For the purpose of this regulation, the following words shall have the following meanings:
Adult-only retail tobacco store: An establishment that is not required to possess a retail food permit whose
primary purpose is to sell or offer for sale but not for resale, tobacco products and/or smoke accessories, in
which the sale of other products is merely incidental, and in which the entry of persons under the minimum
legal sales age is prohibited at all times, and maintains a valid permit for the retail sale of tobacco products as
required to be issued by the Norwood Board of Health.
Blunt Wrap: Any tobacco product manufactured or packaged as a wrap or as a hollow tube made wholly or in
part from tobacco that is designed or intended to be filled by the consumer with loose tobacco or other fillers
regardless of any content.
Business Agent: An individual who has been designated by the owner or operator of any establishment to be the
manager or otherwise in charge of said establishment.
Characterizing Flavor: A distinguishable taste or aroma, other than the taste or aroma of tobacco, imparted or
detectable either prior to or during consumption of a tobacco product or component part thereof, including, but
not limited to, tastes or aromas relating to any fruit, chocolate, vanilla, honey, candy, cocoa, dessert, alcoholic
beverage, menthol, mint, wintergreen, herb or spice; provided, however, that no tobacco product shall be
determined to have a characterizing flavor solely because of the provision of ingredient information or the use
of additives or flavorings that do not contribute to the distinguishable taste or aroma of the product.
Cigar: Any roll of tobacco that is wrapped in leaf tobacco or in any substance containing tobacco with or
without a tip or mouthpiece not otherwise defined as a cigarette under Massachusetts General Law, Chapter
64C, Section 1, Paragraph 1.
Component part: Any element of a tobacco product, including, but not limited to, the tobacco, filter and paper,
but not including any constituent.
Constituent: Any ingredient, substance, chemical or compound, other than tobacco, water or reconstituted
tobacco sheet, that is added by the manufacturer to a tobacco product during the processing, manufacturing or
packaging of the tobacco product. Such term shall include a smoke constituent.
5
Coupon: Any card, paper, note, form, statement, ticket or other issue distributed for commercial or promotional
purposes to be later surrendered by the bearer so as to receive an article, service or accommodation without
charge or at a discount price.
Distinguishable: Perceivable by either the sense of smell or taste.
Educational Institution: Any public or private college, school, professional school, scientific or technical
institution, university or other institution furnishing a program of higher education.
Employee: Any individual who performs services for an employer.
Employer: Any individual, partnership, association, corporation, trust or other organized group of individuals
that uses the services of one (1) or more employees.
Flavored tobacco product: Any tobacco product or component part thereof that contains a constituent that has
or produces a characterizing flavor. A public statement, claim or indicia made or disseminated by the
manufacturer of a tobacco product, or by any person authorized or permitted by the manufacturer to make or
disseminate public statements concerning such tobacco product, that such tobacco product has or produces a
characterizing flavor shall constitute presumptive evidence that the tobacco product is a flavored tobacco
product.
Health Care Institution: An individual, partnership, association, corporation or trust or any person or group of
persons that provides health care services and employs health care providers licensed, or subject to licensing, by
the Massachusetts Department of Public Health under M.G.L. c. 112 or a retail establishment that provides
pharmaceutical goods and services and is subject to the provisions of 247 CMR 6.00. Health care institutions
include, but are not limited to, hospitals, clinics, health centers, pharmacies, drug stores, doctor offices,
optician/optometrist offices and dentist offices.
Liquid Nicotine Container: A bottle or other vessel which contains nicotine in liquid or gel form, whether or
not combined with another substance or substances, for use in a tobacco product, as defined herein. The term
does not include a container containing nicotine in a cartridge that is sold, marketed, or intended for use in a
tobacco product, as defined herein, if the cartridge is prefilled and sealed by the manufacturer and not intended
to be open by the consumer or retailer.
Listed or non-discounted price: The higher of the price listed for a tobacco product on its package or the price
listed on any related shelving, posting, advertising or display at the place where the tobacco product is sold or
offered for sale plus all applicable taxes if such taxes are not included in the state price, and before the
application of any discounts or coupons.
Marijuana Accessories: Equipment, products, devices, or materials of any kind that are intended or designed
for use in ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing marijuana into the human body.
Marijuana Retailer: “Marijuana Retailer” as defined in 935 CMR 500.002.
6
Minimum Legal Sales Age (MLSA): The age an individual must be before that individual can be sold a tobacco
product in the municipality.
Non-Residential Roll-Your-Own (RYO) Machine: A mechanical device made available for use (including to an
individual who produces cigars, cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, pipe tobacco, or roll-your-own tobacco solely
for the individual’s own personal consumption or use) that is capable of making cigarettes, cigars or other
tobacco products. RYO machines located in private homes used for solely personal consumption are not Non-
Residential RYO machines.
Permit Holder: Any person engaged in the sale or distribution of tobacco products who applies for and receives
a tobacco product sales permit or any person who is required to apply for a Tobacco Product Sales Permit
pursuant to these regulations, or his or her business agent.
Person: Any individual, firm, partnership, association, corporation, company or organization of any kind,
including but not limited to, an owner, operator, manager, proprietor or person in charge of any establishment,
business or retail store.
Registered Marijuana Dispensary: “Medical Marijuana Treatment Center, also known as a Registered
Marijuana Dispensary” as defined in 935 CMR 500.002.
Self-Service Display: Any display from which customers may select a tobacco product, as defined herein,
without assistance from an employee or store personnel.
Schools: Public or private elementary or secondary schools.
Smoke Accessories: Equipment, products, devices, or materials of any kind that are intended or designed for
use in ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing Tobacco Product, marijuana, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC),
or cannabidiol (CBD) into the human body, including, but not limited to, Marijuana Accessories, bongs, pipes,
glass pipes, vaporizers, vape pens, hookah apparatus, dab rigs, pods, tanks, and cartridges.
Smoke Constituent: Any chemical or chemical compound in mainstream or sidestream tobacco smoke that
either transfers from any component of the tobacco product to the smoke or that is formed by the combustion or
heating of tobacco, additives or other component of the tobacco product.
Tobacco Product: Any product containing, made, or derived from tobacco or nicotine that is intended for human
consumption, whether smoked, chewed, absorbed, dissolved, inhaled, snorted, sniffed, or ingested by any other
means, including, but not limited to: cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff; or
electronic cigarettes, electronic cigars, electronic pipes, electronic hookah, liquid nicotine, “e-liquids” or other
similar products, regardless of nicotine content, that rely on vaporization or aerosolization. “Tobacco product”
includes any component or part of a tobacco product. “Tobacco product” does not include any product that has
been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration either as a tobacco use cessation product or
for other medical purposes and which is being marketed and sold or prescribed solely for the approved purpose.
7
Tobacco Product Sales Permit: A permit issued by the Norwood Board of Health for selling or otherwise
distributing Tobacco Products in the Town of Norwood.
Vending Machine: Any automated or mechanical self-service device, which upon insertion of money, tokens or
any other form of payment, dispenses or makes cigarettes or any other tobacco products, as defined herein.

D. Tobacco Sales to Persons Under the Minimum Legal Sales Age Prohibited:
1. No person shall sell tobacco products or smoke accessories or permit tobacco products or smoke accessories,
as defined herein, to be sold to a person under the minimum legal sales age; or not being the individual’s parent
or legal guardian, give tobacco products, as defined herein, to a person under the minimum legal sales age. The
minimum legal sales age in Norwood is 21.
2. Required Signage:
a. In conformance with and in addition to Massachusetts General Law, Chapter 270, Section 7, a copy of
Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 270, Section 6, shall be posted conspicuously by the owner or
other person in charge thereof in the shop or other place used to sell tobacco products at retail. The
notice shall be provided by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health and made available from the
Norwood Board of Health. The notice shall be at least 48 square inches and shall be posted
conspicuously by the permit holder in the retail establishment or other place in such a manner so that it
may be readily seen by a person standing at or approaching the cash register. The notice shall directly
face the purchaser and shall not be obstructed from view or placed at a height of less than 4 feet or
greater than 9 feet from the floor. The owner or other person in charge of a shop or other place used to
sell tobacco products at retail shall conspicuously post any additional signs required by the
Massachusetts Department of Public Health. The owner or other person in charge of a shop or other
place used to sell hand rolled cigars must display a warning about cigar consumption in a sign at least 50
square inches pursuant to 940 CMR 22.06 (2) (e).
b. The owner or other person in charge of a shop or other place used to sell tobacco products, as defined
herein, at retail shall conspicuously post signage provided by the Norwood Board of Health that
discloses current referral information about smoking cessation.
c. The owner or other person in charge of a shop or other place used to sell tobacco products that rely on
vaporization or aerosolization, as defined herein as “tobacco products”, at retail shall conspicuously post
a sign stating that “The sale of tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, to someone under the minimum
legal sales age of 21 years is prohibited.” The notice shall be no smaller than 8.5 inches by 11 inches and
shall be posted conspicuously in the retail establishment or other place in such a manner so that it may
be readily seen by a person standing at or approaching the cash register. The notice shall directly face
the purchaser and shall not be obstructed from view or placed at a height of less than four (4) feet or
greater than nine (9) feet from the floor.
3. Identification: Each person selling or distributing tobacco products, as defined herein, shall verify the age of
the purchaser by means of a valid government-issued photographic identification containing the bearer’s date of
birth that the purchaser is 21 years old or older. Verification is required for any person under the age of 27.
8
4. All retail sales of tobacco products, as defined herein, must be face-to-face between the seller and the buyer
and occur at the permitted location.

E. Tobacco Product Sales Permit:
1. No person shall sell or otherwise distribute tobacco products, as defined herein, within the Town of Norwood
without first obtaining a Tobacco Product Sales Permit issued annually by the Norwood Board of Health. Only
owners of establishments with a permanent, non-mobile location in Norwood are eligible to apply for a permit
and sell tobacco products, as defined herein, at the specified location in Norwood.
2. As part of the Tobacco Product Sales Permit application process, the applicant will be provided with the
Norwood regulation. Each applicant is required to sign a statement declaring that the applicant has read said
regulation and that the applicant is responsible for instructing any and all employees who will be responsible for
tobacco product sales regarding federal, state and local laws regarding the sale of tobacco and this regulation.
3. Each applicant who sells tobacco products is required to provide proof of a current Tobacco Retailer License
issued by the Massachusetts Department of Revenue, when required by state law, before a Tobacco Product
Sales Permit can be issued.
4. A separate permit, displayed conspicuously, is required for each retail establishment selling tobacco products,
as defined herein. The fee for which shall be determined by the Norwood Board of Health annually.
5. A Tobacco Product Sales Permit is non-transferable. A new owner of an establishment that sells tobacco
products, as defined herein, must apply for a new permit. No new permit will be issued unless and until all
outstanding penalties incurred by the previous permit holder are satisfied in full.
6. Issuance of a Tobacco Product Sales Permit shall be conditioned on an applicant’s consent to unannounced,
periodic inspections of his/her retail establishment to ensure compliance with this regulation.
7. A Tobacco Product Sales Permit will not be renewed if the permit holder has failed to pay all fines issued and
the time period to appeal the fines has expired and/or the permit holder has not satisfied any outstanding permit
suspensions.
8. A Tobacco Product Sales Permit will not be renewed if the permit holder has sold a tobacco product to a
person under the MLSA (§D.1) three times within the previous permit year and the time period to appeal has
expired. The violator may request a hearing in accordance with subsection 4 of the Violations section.
9. Maximum Number of Tobacco Product Sales Permits.
a. At any given time, there shall be no more than 34 Tobacco Product Sales Permits issued in Norwood
reduced by the number of permits not renewed pursuant to §9(c). No permit renewal will be denied
based on the requirements of this subsection except any permit holder who has failed to renew his or her
permit within thirty (30) days of expiration will be treated as a first-time permit applicant.
9
b. At any given time, there shall be no more than two (2) Tobacco Products Sales Permits issued to Adult-
Only Retail Tobacco Stores, as defined herein, in Norwood. No permit renewal by an Adult-Only Retail
Tobacco Store will be denied based on the requirements of this subsection except any permit holder who
has failed to renew his or her permit within thirty (30) days of expiration will be treated as a first-time
permit applicant. As of the publication date of the legal notice (June 27, 2019), any permit not renewed
either because an Adult-Only Retail Tobacco Store no longer sells tobacco products, as defined herein,
or because a retailer closes the retail business, shall be returned to the Norwood Board of Health and
shall be permanently retired by the Board of Health and the total allowable number of Tobacco Product
Sales Permits issued to Adult-Only Retail Tobacco Stores under this paragraph shall be reduced by the
number of the retired permits. Applicants who purchase or acquire an existing Adult-Only Retail
Tobacco Store that holds a valid Tobacco Product Sales Permit at the time of the sale or acquisition of
said business must apply within sixty (60) days of such sale or acquisition for the permit held by the
Current Permit Holder if the Applicant intends to operate as an Adult-Only Retail Tobacco Store, as
defined herein. Any conversion of an existing Retail Tobacco Store Permit holder to an Adult Only
Retail Tobacco Store must be in compliance with §9(d).
c. As of January 1, 2018 any permit not renewed either because a retailer no longer sells tobacco products,
as defined herein, or because a retailer closes the retail business, shall be returned to the Norwood Board
of Health and shall be permanently retired by the Board of Health and the total allowable number of
Tobacco Product Sales Permits under paragraph 11(a) shall be reduced by the number of the retired
permits.
d. A Tobacco Product Sales Permit or Adult-Only Retail Tobacco Store Permit shall not be issued to any
new applicant for a retail location within 500 feet of a public or private elementary or secondary school
as measured by a straight line from the nearest point of the property line of the school to the nearest
point of the property line of the site of the applicant’s business premises.
e. Applicants who purchase an existing business that holds a valid Tobacco Product Sales Permit at the
time of the sale of said business must apply within sixty (60) days of such sale for the permit held by the
Seller if the Buyer intends to sell tobacco products, as defined herein.

F. Cigar Sales Regulated:
1. No person shall sell or distribute or cause to be sold or distributed a single cigar.
2. No person shall sell or distribute or cause to be sold or distributed any original factory-wrapped package of
two or more cigars, unless such package is priced for retail sale at $5.00 or more.
3. This Section shall not apply to:
a. The sale or distribution of any single cigar having a retail price of two dollars and fifty cents ($2.50) or
more.
10
b. A person or entity engaged in the business of selling or distributing cigars for commercial purposes to
another person or entity engaged in the business of selling or distributing cigars for commercial
purposes with the intent to sell or distribute outside the boundaries of Norwood.
4. The Norwood Board of Health may adjust from time to time the amounts specified in this Section to reflect
changes in the applicable Consumer Price Index by amendment of this regulation.
G. Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products Prohibited:
No person shall sell or distribute or cause to be sold or distributed any flavored tobacco product.

H. Sale of Smoke Accessories Prohibited:
No person shall sell or distribute or cause to be sold or distributed any smoke accessories, as defined herein,
except in adult-only retail tobacco stores, marijuana retailers, or registered marijuana dispensaries, as defined
herein.

I. Prohibition of the Sale of Blunt Wraps:
No person or entity shall sell or distribute blunt wraps in Norwood.

J. Free Distribution and Coupon Redemption: No person shall:
1. Distribute or cause to be distributed, any free samples of tobacco products, as defined herein;
2. Accept or redeem, offer to accept or redeem, or cause or hire any person to accept or redeem or offer
to accept or redeem any coupon that provides any tobacco product, as defined herein, without charge or for
less than the listed or non-discounted price; or
3. Sell a tobacco product, as defined herein, to consumers through any multi-pack discounts (e.g., “buy-twoget-
one-free”) or otherwise provide or distribute to consumers any tobacco product, as defined herein,
without charge or for less than the listed or non-discounted price in exchange for the purchase of any other
tobacco product.
4. Sections 2 and 3 shall not apply to products, such as cigarettes, for which there is a state law prohibiting
them from being sold as loss leaders and for which a minimum retail price is required by state law.

K. Out-of-Package Sales:
1. The sale or distribution of tobacco products, as defined herein, in any form other than an original factorywrapped
package is prohibited, including the repackaging or dispensing of any tobacco product, as defined
herein, for retail sale. No person may sell or cause to be sold or distribute or cause to be distributed any
cigarette package that contains fewer than twenty (20) cigarettes, including single cigarettes.
11
2. A retailer of Liquid Nicotine Containers must comply with the provisions of 310 CMR 30.000, and must
provide the Norwood Board of Health with a written plan for disposal of said product, including disposal
plans for any breakage, spillage or expiration of the product.
3. All retailers must comply with 940 CMR 21.05 which reads: “It shall be an unfair or deceptive act or
practice for any person to sell or distribute nicotine in a liquid or gel substance in Massachusetts after March
15, 2016 unless the liquid or gel product is contained in a child-resistant package that, at a minimum, meets
the standard for special packaging as set forth in 15 U.S. C.§§1471 through 1476 and 16 CFR §1700 et.
Seq.”

L. Self-Service Displays:
All self-service displays of tobacco products, as defined herein, are prohibited. All humidors including, but not
limited to, walk-in humidors must be locked.

M. Vending Machines:
All vending machines containing tobacco products, as defined herein, are prohibited.

N. Non-Residential Roll-Your-Own Machines:
All Non-Residential Roll-Your-Own machines are prohibited.

O. Prohibition of the Sale of Tobacco Products by Health Care Institutions:
No health care institution located in Norwood shall sell or cause to be sold tobacco products, as defined herein.
No retail establishment that operates or has a health care institution within it, such as a pharmacy,
optician/optometrist or drug store, shall sell or cause to be sold tobacco products, as defined herein.

P. Prohibition of the Sale of Tobacco Products by Educational Institutions:
No educational institution located in Norwood shall sell or cause to be sold tobacco products, as defined herein.
This includes all educational institutions as well as any retail establishments that operate on the property of an
educational institution.

Q. Incorporation of Attorney General Regulation 940 CMR 21.00:
The sale or distribution of tobacco products, as defined herein, must comply with those provisions found at 940
CMR 21.00 (“Sale and Distribution of Cigarettes, Smokeless Tobacco Products, and Electronic Smoking
Devices in Massachusetts”).
12

R. Violations:
1. It shall be the responsibility of the establishment, permit holder and/or his or her business agent to ensure
compliance with all sections of this regulation. The violator shall receive:
a. In the case of a first violation, a fine of one hundred dollars ($100.00).
b. In the case of a second violation within 36 months of the date of the current violation, a fine of two
hundred dollars ($200.00) and the Tobacco Product Sales Permit shall be suspended for seven (7)
consecutive business days.
c. In the case of three or more violations within a 36 month period, a fine of three hundred dollars
($300.00) and the Tobacco Product Sales Permit shall be suspended for thirty (30) consecutive business
days.
d. In the case of four violations or repeated, egregious violations of this regulation within a 36 month
period, the Board of Health shall hold a hearing in accordance with subsection 4 of this section and may
permanently revoke a Tobacco Product Sales Permit.
2. Refusal to cooperate with inspections pursuant to this regulation shall result in the suspension of the Tobacco
Product Sales Permit for thirty (30) consecutive business days.
3. In addition to the monetary fines set above, any permit holder who engages in the sale or distribution of
tobacco products while his or her permit is suspended shall be subject to the suspension of all Board of Health
issued permits for thirty (30) consecutive business days.
4. The Norwood Board of Health shall provide notice of the intent to suspend or revoke a Tobacco Product
Sales Permit, which notice shall contain the reasons therefor and establish a time and date for a hearing which
date shall be no earlier than seven (7) days after the date of said notice. The permit holder or its business agent
shall have an opportunity to be heard at such hearing and shall be notified of the Board of Health’s decision and
the reasons therefor in writing. After a hearing, the Norwood Board of Health shall suspend or revoke the
Tobacco Product Sales Permit if the Board of Health finds that a violation of this regulation occurred. For
purposes of such suspensions or revocations, the Board shall make the determination notwithstanding any
separate criminal or non-criminal proceedings brought in court hereunder or under the Massachusetts General
Laws for the same offense. All tobacco products, as defined herein, shall be removed from the retail
establishment upon suspension or revocation of the Tobacco Product Sales Permit. Failure to remove all
tobacco products, as defined herein, shall constitute a separate violation of this regulation.
S. Non-Criminal Disposition:
Whoever violates any provision of this regulation may be penalized by the non-criminal method of disposition
as provided in Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 40, Section 21D or by filing a criminal complaint at the
appropriate venue.
13

T. Separate Violations:
Each day any violation exists shall be deemed to be a separate offense.

U. Enforcement:
Enforcement of this regulation shall be by the Norwood Board of Health or its designated agent(s).
Any resident who desires to register a complaint pursuant to the regulation may do so by contacting the
Norwood Board of Health or its designated agent(s) and the Board shall investigate.

V. Severability:
If any provision of this regulation is declared invalid or unenforceable, the other provisions shall not be affected
thereby but shall continue in full force and effect.

W. Effective Date:
This regulation shall take effect on September 15, 2019.
Kathleen F. Bishop
Joan M. Jacobs
Carolyn Riccardi

Townwide Master Planning Committee choses consultant

At its meeting last week the Townwide Master Planning  Committee selected the Community Circle group as the committee’s consultants for what is expected to be a year long process of creating a master plan for Town of Medfield.  Community Circle was one of two finalists that were interviewed that evening, and the committee’s vote was 11-1 to hire Community Circle over Horsley Witten.

Community Circle shared the hand out below at the end of its presentation.  Start jotting down your issues and questions to incorporate into the Master Plan, as you will be asked to share them as the process evolves.

Community Circle Consulting Team20190627-Community Circle_Page_2