The letter below that I received this week from the Norfolk Register of Deeds highlights for Medfield how, as a town, we all pay in to the Massachusetts Community Preservation Act (CPA) fund ($44,250 last year), but we get none of the monies or benefits back because we have not adopted the CPA.
The CPA is a self-imposed additional tax of from 1-3%, in exchange for which the town get state matching monies. CPA monies have to be spent on one of three areas:
- historic preservation
- affordable housing
- open space and recreation
My analysis has always been that where we already spend on those three things anyway, that by not adopting the CPA that we are merely forgoing the state matching monies.
The one time the CPA went to the annual town meeting (ATM), about ten years ago, it was defeated.
Hi Pete, In reading this CPA letter and your comments, it certainly seems silly for Medfield to NOT adopt the CPA. Am I understanding this correctly? Medfield is currently paying the State $44,150, and we getting nothing in return, but if we adopt the CPA, we still pay this amount, but we would get all if back to use for: – historic preservation – affordable housing – open space and recreation
Do you feel it that the Town of Medfield should put it on the Warrant and try again? Who would place it on the Warrant? Thanks,Colleen
LikeLike
It does not work exactly as you posited, but somewhat similarly.
This website (https://www.communitypreservation.org/) has really good explanations of the Massachusetts Community Preservation Act (CPA) and its many ramifications – it is way better than I can provide.
There has been a town CPA Study Committee, which could champion its passage. The Board of Selectmen may have put it on the warrant the last time. The last few times it was on the annual town meeting (ATM) warrant, it was pulled, as no one was championing it.
LikeLike