Category Archives: Legislature

Medfield gets the rest of its road $

Governor Patrick failed to release $100m. of appropriated road repair monies this fiscal year, as he did last fiscal year also, because the legislature failed to appropriate as much as he wanted for the transportation budget.  Governor Baker released those monies on his first day in office.


 

GOV. BAKER WILL RELEASE $100 MIL IN LOCAL ROAD FUNDS

By Matt Murphy
STATE HOUSE NEWS SERVICE

STATE HOUSE, BOSTON, JAN. 8, 2014…..Gov. Charlie Baker will make good on a campaign promise Thursday afternoon by making his first official action as governor to release $100 million for local road and bridge repairs.

The funding, which had been authorized by the Legislature but withheld by former Gov. Deval Patrick, will be dispersed to cities and towns to pay for local infrastructure projects.

Patrick released $200 million for Chapter 90 last year, but held back the additional funding because he said the borrowing capacity was needed for other transportation priorities.

Lawmakers were highly critical of Patrick’s decision not to release the funding, and Baker during the campaign pledged to release the funding as soon as he took office.

During his inaugural address, Baker on Thursday said he hoped to address a “spending problem” in state government to address a midyear budget gap that he estimated at more than $500 million.

Baker, who supported a November ballot law that unhinged the gas tax from an inflation index, said during his address that he would hold the line on taxes but that everything else was on the table in the upcoming budget-balancing exercise.

The governor must file a fiscal 2016 spending plan by March 4, though a proposal to address the midyear gap could be rolled out before that date.

MMA on needed steps

The Massachusetts Municipal Association‘s alert today tries to focus candidates for office on the broken elements in the state and municipality relationship.  Having watched and lived the problems for fourteen years now as a selectman, I agree that all of the ten issues are deserving of repair.


September 11, 2014

MMA ISSUES 10 PARTNERSHIP POLICIES TO BUILD A STRONGER COMMONWEALTH

MMA Urges All Candidates for Governor and the Legislature to Support These Important Policies to Ensure a Powerful and Productive State-Local Partnership

Please Encourage All Candidates Seeking Office to Embrace These 10 Partnership Policies to Invest In and Support Local Government

Local leaders across Massachusetts are committed to working very closely with the Commonwealth’s next Governor and all incoming legislators to deepen and strengthen the partnership between cities and towns and state government, because a powerful state-local partnership is absolutely essential in order for Massachusetts to achieve lasting social and economic progress and prosperity for our communities and residents.

On behalf of the cities and towns of Massachusetts, the MMA has issued 10 Partnership Policies to Build a Stronger Commonwealth, and is asking all of the candidates for Governor and the Legislature to publicly embrace this powerful agenda. These policies cover a wide range of vital issues, reflecting the extraordinary breadth of shared responsibilities that are held by state and local leaders.

The MMA’s 10 Partnership Policies are explained in a special 12-page publication that was posted on the MMA website and mailed to local officials, legislators and the candidates for Governor earlier today. You can download a copy of the MMA’s 10 Partnership Policies to Build a Stronger Commonwealth by clicking here.

Taken together, these 10 Partnership Policies will rebuild a strong and lasting state-local financial relationship, invest in communities for economic development and progress, ensure effective and sustainable government administration, and create a working state-local partnership for the future.

THE 10 PARTNERSHIP POLICIES TO BUILD A STRONGER COMMONWEALTH ARE:

1 – RESTORE REVENUE SHARING. We must build a new and enduring state-local fiscal partnership that shares future state tax revenue growth with cities and towns in order to fund local government services and reduce our overreliance on the property tax.

2 – FIX THE SCHOOL FINANCE LAW. We must update and modernize the Chapter 70 school finance law to ensure that all students have access to high-quality and adequately funded public education programs, and state and local governments share fairly in the cost.

3 – FUND KEY PROGRAMS AND OBLIGATIONS. The state must meet its commitments and obligations to fund essential aid accounts for targeted municipal and school programs, including full funding of all state mandates.

4 – SUPPORT FAIRNESS IN LOCAL TAXATION. We should reform and improve the cumbersome state-local system of property exemptions, abatements and tax relief to ensure that needy taxpayers are protected from an excessive property tax burden, and to provide that local property tax exemptions are only granted where truly warranted.

5 – OPPOSE UNFUNDED MANDATES. State government must fully fund all mandated programs, laws and regulations, and must commit to a process that reviews and identifies the cost of all proposed mandates and regulatory changes prior to their enactment.

6 – INVEST IN ESSENTIAL PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE. State government needs to increase its investment in the “bricks and mortar” underpinnings of our public infrastructure at the local and state level to ensure that we can sustain and expand a modern economy and vibrant communities.

7 – INVEST IN ESSENTIAL PUBLIC TECHNOLOGY. State government needs to invest in public technology at the local and state level to ensure that Massachusetts will be competitive in the modern global economy.

8 – EMPOWER CITIZEN-DRIVEN PLANNING AND ZONING. State government should carefully update the state’s Zoning Act and related laws to provide cities and towns with new authority and flexibility to guide residential and business land use decisions toward local and state goals.

9 – ALLOW CITIES AND TOWNS TO EFFECTIVELY MANAGE. State government should recognize that the archaic personnel management and benefit system in Massachusetts imposes burdens on municipal budgets, makes it difficult to attract and retain qualified employees, and is in need of “stem to stern” modernization.

10 – COMMIT TO CONSTANT COMMUNICATION AND DIRECT DIALOGUE. Municipal leaders ask the Governor and Lt. Governor to both attend and actively participate in the Local Government Advisory Commission.

A strong and enduring partnership between cities and towns and state government is essential to a healthy and expanding economy and to the ability of local government to provide world-class education and municipal services, ensure safe streets and neighborhoods, and maintain local roads and vital infrastructure. This partnership is fundamental to our state’s economic success and competitiveness, which is why the MMA is offering these 10 Partnership Policies.

By Working Together, Local and State Leaders Can Build a Strong and Prosperous Future for Massachusetts

Please Encourage All Candidates and Community Residents to Embrace These 10 Partnership Policies to Invest In and Support Local Government

MSH purchase bill & MPC status

Bill Massaro provided to me a link to a clearer version of the legislation that authorizes the town to buy the former MSH site.  The link is above the actual legislation is below.

The MSH Master Planning Committee has had one meeting so far in what is to be its 10 month task to get the town to a planned redevelopment of the site.  Their first task is to put out an RFP for the consultant who will do the heavy lifting and work to get all the planning done on that accelerated basis.

The MSH MPC will meet the second that fourth Tuesdays of the month, starting 9/9/2014, when they will hear from Beth Murphy from Mass Development about how Northampton State Hospital was redeveloped.  At their 9/23 meeting they will hear from Foxboro planners about the Foxboro State Hospital project.


Chapter 211 AN ACT AUTHORIZING THE COMMISSIONER OF CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE TO CONVEY CERTAIN PARCELS OF LAND IN THE TOWN OF MEDFIELD

     Whereas, The deferred operation of this act would tend to defeat its purpose, which is to provide forthwith for the conveyance of land in the town of Medfield, therefore it is hereby declared to be an emergency law, necessary for the immediate preservation of the public convenience.

     Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same as follows:
     SECTION 1.  Notwithstanding sections 32 to 37, inclusive, of chapter 7C of the General Laws, chapter 269 of the acts of 2008 or any other general or special law to the contrary, the commissioner of capital asset management and maintenance may convey certain parcels of land located at the former Medfield State Hospital to the town of Medfield.  The parcels are shown as parcel A and parcel B on a plan entitled “Compiled Plan of Land, Medfield State Hospital, Medfield, Massachusetts, prepared for Division of Capital Asset Management”, dated June 14, 2005, prepared by Judith Nitsch Engineering, Inc., on file with the division of capital asset management and maintenance. The exact location and boundaries of the parcels to be conveyed shall be determined by the commissioner, in consultation with the town of Medfield.  The use of the parcels to be conveyed to the town shall not be restricted to use for municipal or other specific purposes; provided, however, that the town may so restrict the parcels at a later date, in accordance with any applicable general and special laws.  The parcels shall be conveyed by deed without warranties or representations by the commonwealth.
SECTION 2.  As consideration for the conveyance of the parcels described in section 1, the town of Medfield shall pay the commonwealth an amount equal to certain costs related to the closure of the former state hospital in Medfield including, but not limited to, the costs of removing combustible materials, disconnecting certain utilities and otherwise closing those buildings located on the parcels conveyed, routine security and other capital expenditures and operating expenses incurred by the commonwealth in preparation for or following the closure of the former state hospital, as determined by the commissioner and agreed to by the town.  The town of Medfield may pay the amount so determined by the commissioner and agreed to by the town upon its purchase of the parcels described in section 1 or the town may pay the amount so determined in 10 annual payments pursuant to section 20A of chapter 58 of the General Laws. If the town’s payment of consideration pursuant to this section so requires, the town may seek voter approval pursuant to subsection (k) of section 21C of chapter 59 of the General Laws.
SECTION 3.  In the event that the town of Medfield sells or leases any portion of the parcels described in section 1, the net proceeds from such sale or lease as determined by the town and agreed to by the commissioner, shall be allocated between the town of Medfield and the commonwealth in equal shares; provided, however, that the commissioner may agree to reduce the share of the commonwealth’s proceeds to not less than 30 per cent of net proceeds in order to provide certain incentives to the town of Medfield to sell or lease any of the parcels described in section 1 expeditiously or to facilitate the development of some or all of the parcels in accordance with smart growth principles promulgated from time to time by the governor and the secretary of energy and environmental affairs.  In the event that the net proceeds, as so determined, is a negative amount, the commonwealth shall not be required to make any payments to the town of Medfield.
SECTION 4.  Notwithstanding any general or special law to the contrary, the town of Medfield shall pay for all costs and expenses of the transactions authorized in this act as determined by the commissioner including, but not limited to, the costs of any recording fees and deed preparation related to the conveyances and for all costs, liabilities and expenses of any nature and kind related to the town’s ownership of the parcels; provided, however, that such costs shall be included for the purposes of determining the net proceeds of the town’s sale or lease of any portion of the parcels described in section 1.  Amounts paid by the town of Medfield pursuant to section 2 shall not be included for the purposes of determining the net proceeds from a sale or lease.
SECTION 5.  Notwithstanding chapter 269 of the acts of 2008 or any other general or special law to the contrary, parcels A-1 and A-2, as shown on the plan referenced in section 1 shall be maintained as open space or used for agricultural and passive recreation purposes, subject to those subsurface utility easements on parcel A-1 serving the town’s water system.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, but subject to such subsurface utility easements, the commissioner of capital asset management and maintenance may transfer the care and custody of parcels A-1, A-2 and C, or portions thereof, to the department of conservation and recreation for open space and passive recreation purposes.  Such transfer shall be without consideration and shall not be subject to chapter 7C of the General Laws.
SECTION 6.  (a) In the event that the town of Medfield does not complete its purchase of the property described in section 1 on or before December 31, 2015, then notwithstanding sections 33 to 38, inclusive, of chapter 7C of the General Laws or any other general or special law to the contrary, the commissioner may sell, lease for terms of up to 99 years, including all renewals and extensions, or otherwise grant, convey or transfer to purchasers or lessees an interest in the property described in section 1 or portions thereof, subject to this section and on such terms and conditions that the commissioner considers appropriate; provided, however, that the purchase by the town of Medfield shall be considered complete upon the transfer of title to the parcels described in section 1 to the town. The commissioner shall dispose of the property, or portion thereof, using appropriate competitive bidding processes and procedures. At least 30 days before the date on which bids, proposals or other offers to purchase or lease a property, or any portion thereof, are due, the commissioner shall place a notice in the central register published by the state secretary pursuant to section 20A of chapter 9 of the General Laws stating the availability of the property, the nature of the competitive bidding process and other information that the commissioner considers relevant, including the time, place and manner for the submission of bids and proposals and the opening of the bids or proposals.
(b)  Notwithstanding any general or special law to the contrary, the grantee or lessee of all or any portion of the property described in section 1 and subject to this section shall be responsible for costs and expenses including, but not limited to, costs associated with deed preparation and recording fees related to the conveyances and transfers authorized in this section as such costs may be determined by the commissioner.
(c)  No agreement for the sale, lease, transfer or other disposition of the property described in section 1 and subject to this section, or any portion thereof, and no deed executed by or on behalf of the commonwealth, shall be valid unless the agreement or deed contains the following certification, signed by the commissioner:
“I, the undersigned commissioner of capital asset management and maintenance, hereby certify under penalties of perjury that I have fully complied with the relevant provisions of general and special laws in connection with the property described in this document.”
SECTION 7.  In any disposition pursuant to section 1 or section 6, the commissioner may retain, accept or acquire by purchase, transfer, lease, eminent domain pursuant to chapter 79 of the General Laws or otherwise and may grant by deed, transfer, lease or otherwise any rights-of-way or easements in, over or beneath any parcel or any portion thereof or any other portions of the former Medfield State Hospital, as the commissioner deems necessary and appropriate for the continued access to, egress from and use of portions of the former Medfield State Hospital including, without limitation, parcels A-1 and A-2, by the general public or other state agencies or to carry out this act; provided however that in any disposition pursuant to section 1, such retention, acceptance, acquisition, or grant of any rights-of-way or easements in, over or beneath parcels A or B shall be subject to the approval of the town of Medfield.
SECTION 8.  Sections 1 to 4, inclusive, shall take effect in the town of Medfield upon their acceptance by a majority vote of the board of selectmen of the town of Medfield but not otherwise.

Approved, August 1, 2014.

MSH actual bll attached

Here is the actual legislation, as provided by the state to the town clerk –


\/
H 4216
Chapter      – 211

TH E  C 0 M M 0 N W E A L T H  0  F     M A S S A C H U S E T T S

In  the Year Two  Thousand  and Fourteen

AN ACT AUTHORIZING THE COMMISSIONER OF CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE TO CONVEY CERTAIN
PARCELS OF LAND IN THE TOWN OF MEDFIELD.

Whereas, The deferred operation of this act would tend to defeat its purpose, which is to provide
forthwith for the conveyance of land in the town of Medfield, therefore it is hereby declared to be
an emergency law, necessary
for the immediate preservation of the public convenience.
1

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled , and by the
authorit y of   the same, as f ollows:
SECTION 1. Notwithstanding sections 32 to 37, inclusive, of chapter 7C of the General Laws, chapter
269 of the acts of 2008 or any other general or special law to the contrary, the commissioner of
capital asset management and maintenance may convey certain parcels of land located at the former
Medfield State Hospital to the town of Medfield. The parcels are shown as parcel A and parcel B on
a plan entitled “Compiled Plan of Land, Medfield State Hospital, Medfield, Massachusetts, prepared
for Division of Capital Asset Management”, dated June 14, 2005, prepared by Judith Nitsch
Engineering, Inc., on file with the division of capital asset management and maintenance. The exact
location and boundaries of the parcels to be conveyed shall be determined by the commissioner, in
consultation with the town of Medfield. The use of the parcels to be conveyed to the town shall not
be restricted to use for municipal or other specific purposes; provided, however, that the town may
so restrict the parcels at a later date, in accordance with any applicable general and special
laws, The parcels shall be conveyed by deed without warranties or representations by the
commonwealth.
SECTION 2. As consideration for the conveyance of the parcels described in section 1, the town of
Medfield shall pay the commonwealth an amount equal to certain costs related to the closure of the
former state hospital in Medfield including, but not limited to, the costs of removing combustible
materials, disconnecting  certain utilities and otherwise closing those buildings located on the
parcels conveyed, routine security and other capital expenditures and operating expenses incurred
by the commonwealth in preparation for or following the closure of the former state hospital, as
determined by the commissioner and agreed to by the town. The town of Medfield may pay the amount
so determined by the commissioner and ageed to by the town upon its purchase of the parcels
described in section 1 or the town may pay the amount so determined in 10 annual payments pursuant
to section 20A of chapter 58 of the General Laws. If the town’s payment·of consideration

H 4216

pursuant to this section so requires, the town may seek voter approval pursuant to subsection (k)
of section 21C of chapter 59 of the General Laws.
SECTION 3. In the event that the town of Medfield sells or leases any portion of the parcels
described in section 1, the net proceeds from such sale or lease as determined by the town and
agreed to by the commissioner, shall be allocated between the town of Medfield and the commonwealth
in equal shares; provided, however, that the commissioner may agree to reduce the share of the
commonwealth ‘s proceeds to not less than 30 per cent of net proceeds in order to provide certain
incentives to the town of Medfield to sell or lease any of the parcels described in section 1
expeditiously or to facilitate the development of some or all of the parcels in accordance with
smart growth principles promulgated from time to time by the governor and the secretary of energy
and environmental affairs. In the event that the net proceeds, as so determined, is a negative
amo1lllt, the commonwealth shall not be required to make any payments to the town of Medfield.
SECTION 4 . Notwithstanding any general or special law to the contrary, the town of Medfield shall
pay for all costs and expenses of the transactions authorized in this act as determined by the
commissioner including, but not limited to, the costs of any recording fees and deed preparation
related to the conveyances and for all costs, liabilities and expenses of any nature and kind
related to the town’s ownership of the parcels; provided, however, that such costs shall be
included for the purposes of determining the net proceeds of the town’s sale or lease of any
portion of the parcels described in section
1. Amounts paid by the town of Medfield pursuant to section 2 shall not be included for the
purposes of determining the net proceeds from a sale or lease.
SECTION 5. Notwithstanding chapter 269 of the acts of 2008 or any other

general or special law to the contrary, parcels A-1 and A-2, as shown on the plan referenced in
section 1 shall be maintained as open space or used for
agricultural and passive recreation purposes,
subject to those subsurface utility  easements  on parcel
A-1
serving the  town’s  water  system.  Notwithstanding
the foregoing, but subject to  such subsurface
utility easements, the
commissioner of capital asset management and maintenance may
transfer the care and custody of parcels A-1, A-2 and C, or portions thereof, to the department of
conservation and recreation for open space and passive recreation purposes. Such transfer shall be
without consideration and shall not be subject to chapter 7C of the General Laws.
SECTION 6. (a) In the event that the town of Medfield does not complete its purchase of the
property described in section 1 on or before December 31, 2015, then notwithstanding sections 33 to
38, inclusive, of chapter 7C of the General Laws or any other general or special law to the
contrary, the commissioner may sell, lease for terms of up to 99 years, including all renewals and
extensions, or oterwise grant, convey or transfer to purchasers

2

H  4216

or lessees  an interest in the property described  in  section  1 or  portions thereof , subject to
this section and on such terms and conditions that the commissioner considers  appropriate;
provided,  however,  that  the  purchase  by the town of  Medf ield  shall be  considered  complete
upon  the  transf er  of  title to the parcels described in section 1 to the town . The
commissioner  shall dispose of the property,  or  portion  thereof ,  using  appropriate
competitive bidding processes and procedures . At least 30 days bef ore the date on which bids ,
proposals or  other  of f ers  to  purchase  or  lease  a  property,  or  any portion thereof , are
due, the commissioner sµall place a notice in the central register published by the state secretary
pursuant to sect ion 2 0A  of  chapter  9 of  the  General  Laws  stat ing  the  availability of
the  property 1    the  nature  of
the  competitive  bidding  process  and  other  inf ormation  that  the  commissioner

considers relevant , including the time, place  and  manner  f or  the  submission  of bids  and
proposals  and  the  opening  of  the  bids  or proposals .
( b)      Notwithstanding   any  general   or   special   law  to  the   contrary,   the grantee
or  lessee of  all or  any portion  of  the  property  described  in  sect ion  1 and   subject
to   this   section   shall  be   responsible   f or   costs   and   expenses including,   but
not   limited   to,   costs   associated  with   deed  preparation   and recording   f ees  related
to  the  conveyances   and  transf ers  authorized   in  this sect ion as such costs may  be
determined by the commissioner .
( c)     No   agreement   f or  the  sale,  lease,  transf er  or  other  disposition  of the
property   described   in   section   1  and   subject   to   this   section,   or   any
portion  thereof , shall    be    valid
and  no  deed  executed  by  or unless    the    agreement    or
on  behalf   of  the  commonwealth, deed     contains     the     following rt if ication,  signed by  the  commissioner : “I,   the   undersigned    commissioner   of
maintenance,   hereby   cert if y  under   penalties complied   with   the   relevant   provisions    of
capital   asset   management   and of perj ury that I have f ully general    and    special    laws
in
connection  with the property  described in this document . 11

SECTION 7 , In any disposition pursuant to section 1 or section 6 , the commissioner  may  retain,
accept  or  acquire  by  purchase,  transf er,  lease, eminent domain pursuant to chapter 79 of the
General Laws or otherwise and may grant by deed, transf er , lease or  otherwise  any rights-of
-way or  easements  in, over  or  beneath  any parcel  or  any portion  thereof   or  any  other
portions  of  the f ormer Medf ield State Hospital , as the commissioner deems necessary and
appropriate f or the  cont inued  access  to,  egress  f rom  and  use  of  portions  of the f
ormer Medf ield  State  Hospital  including,  without  limitation,  parcels  A-1 and A- 2 , by the
general  public  or  other  state  agencies  or  to  carry  out  this act ; provided  however that
in any disposition pursuant to section 1, such retention, acceptance, acquisition, or  grant  of
any  rights-of -way  or  easements in, over or beneath parcels  A  or  B  shall  be  subject  to
the  approval  of  the town of Medf ield .

3

H 4216
SECTION 8. Sections 1 to 4, inclusive, shall take effect in the town of Medfield upon their
acceptance by a majority vote of the board of selectmen of
the town of Medfield but not otherwise.

[see the link below for a PDF to see the signatures and dates of passage in each session]

20140801-MSH legislation-signed

MSH bill was signed

Per the email today from Bill Massaro, the legislation authorizing the town’s purchase of the Medfiedl State Hospital site from the state was signed by the Governor on Friday.

Now the town needs to finalize the deal with the state and figure out what the town is going to do with the land.


FYI-
Daily Legislative Update

Weekly Legislative Update

July 28 – August 1, 2014

20. H. 4216, “An Act Authorizing the Commissioner of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance to Convey Certain Parcels of Land in the Town of Medfield”

Sponsors: Rep. Garlick and Sen. Timilty

Signed: 08/01/2014  now Chapter 211 of the Acts of 2014

 

 

Bill

We’re #1

Email from Bill Massaro below.  I never knew the Governor had to have a schedule to sign bills. –


FYI-
Looks like the MSH bill is still on track for Governor’s signing on 8/2.  It has moved from being #6 on his desk on 7/28 to its current #1 position:

Daily Legislative Update

July 31, 2014 All Legislation on the Governor’s Desk

1.)  H. 4216, “An Act Authorizing the Commissioner of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance to Convey Certain Parcels of Land in the Town of Medfield

Sponsors: Rep. Garlick and Sen. Timility

Action Due: 08/02/2014

 

 

Bill

MMA on new bills

This alert today from the Massachusetts Municipal Association with a summary of the onslaught of legislation just passed before the legislative session ended at midnight last night –


Friday, August 1, 2014

LEGISLATURE ENDS ITS FORMAL SESSIONS

Lawmakers Work Past Midnight to Complete Action on Major Bills

The Following Bills Were Passed Last Night and are on the Governor’s Desk:

• Economic Development Bill
• Gun Violence Reduction Bill
• Local Housing Authority Reform Bill
• Environmental Bond Bill
• Water Infrastructure Finance Bill
• Solar Net Metering Bill
• Information Technology Bond Bill
• MMA Analyzing “Shift Swapping” Collective Bargaining Bill


With a midnight deadline looming on Thursday night, members of the House and Senate worked past that time into the early hours of Friday morning to enact dozens of bills, including several major pieces of legislation that had been the subject of extensive negotiation between the branches.  The Legislature’s rules set July 31 as the last day for formal sessions and roll call votes.  From August 1 until a new Legislature is seated in January 2015, the House and Senate can only meet in “informal” sessions to consider issues that have unanimous support and do not require recorded roll call votes.

Among the dozens and dozens of bills that received attention and action this week, six major bills passed that will impact cities and towns, and the MMA is analyzing a seventh bill that would add “shift swapping” to collective bargaining.  These measures are on the Governor’s Desk and will require his signature in order to become law.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BILL PROVIDES SOLID TOOLS FOR CITIES AND TOWNS
MMA Succeeds in Preserving Local Zoning and Permitting Authority for Wireless Antennas
Final Bill Omits the Proposal to Eliminate the Cap on Local Liquor Licenses

The final compromise economic development bill passed by the Legislature includes $10 million for Brownfields remediation, expands the successful I-Cubed infrastructure program and increases eligibility for the Economic Development Incentive Program, increases tax credits for the Housing Development Incentive Program from $5 million to $10 million and creates and capitalizes the Transformative Development Fund at $16 million for Gateway Cities, and retains broad eligibility standards for MassWorks grant funding.

In a major victory for the MMA and local officials, the Legislature rejected language that would have allowed the telecommunications industry to site wireless antennas in virtually any location regardless of local zoning.  This provision, which was included in the House bill and was not in the Senate version, was held in conference and did not become part of the final bill.  Thank you for your calls and letters to your legislators to maintain the fundamental right of local control of land use.

Unfortunately, the final compromise economic development bill passed by the Legislature does not lift the cap on the number of liquor licenses each municipality may issue, despite the strong support of the MMA and municipal leaders for this important economic development tool for local governments.  The Governor and Senate supported this important measure, but the House opposed it.  The MMA will continue fighting to return liquor licenses to local control in the next legislative session.  The bill did include changes reported in the media to allow Boston to appoint its own licensing board, and to add a limited number of licenses in Boston, provisions that originated in local legislation filed by the City.
Click here for a copy of the economic development bill
http://malegislature.gov/Bills/188/House/H4377

AN ACT RELATIVE TO THE REDUCTION OF GUN VIOLENCE
Final Bill Includes Major Program Expansions in Local School Districts
Discuss the Potential Impact with Your Superintendent as Soon as You Can

The media attention on the compromise gun violence legislation passed by lawmakers focused on the provision to allow police chiefs to go to court to prevent “unsuitable” individuals from accessing a firearms identification card for rifles and long guns.  However, the bill also contains a number of sections that apply to public schools and would add new responsibilities at the local level.  We urge you to immediately discuss the implications of the new mandates and programs in the gun control bill with your school superintendent to determine how the measure could impact your public schools and local budgets.

The law contains a Safe and Supportive Schools (S3) framework, which supporters claim will foster a “safe, positive, healthy, and inclusive whole-school learning environment.” DESE is required to develop guidelines and regulations outlining how the program should be implemented locally.  Cities, towns and school districts are not mandated to accept and implement the program, because the law stipulates that S3 must first be adopted by a vote of a school committee, and is subject to local appropriation.

The legislation does require that each school district must have at least one school resource officer and that each school possess a two-way radio communication device for use in communicating solely with police and fire departments in the event of an emergency, although these requirements are both subject to local appropriation. The MMA successfully advocated for the inclusion of language limiting potential legal liability for districts in both sections.

Under the bill, each school is required to create a mental health plan for its students, families, teachers, and administrators.  DESE is charged with developing the guidelines and requirements for implementation.  There is no state funding, and the program is a new mandate on cities, towns and school districts.  The MMA requested that this provision be held in conference because it is an unfunded mandate with major complexity, but the language remained in the final bill.  Similarly, each school must also provide suicide prevention training of at least 2 hours every 3 years for all licensed school personnel.  The MMA was successful in sponsoring language to limit legal liability for districts on both of these new requirements.

Click here for a copy of the gun violence prevention bill
http://malegislature.gov/Bills/188/House/H4376

HOUSING AUTHORITY REFORM

A compromise housing authority reform measure passed by the House and Senate would require the state Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) to create a comprehensive training program focused on proper management for all housing authority board members. Further, DHCD will be responsible for creating a performance-based monitoring program for all housing authorities. The bill establishes a program based on best practices in collaborative capital, maintenance, and repair planning, with participation required for those housing authorities with under 500 state-aided units. An annual plan will be required of each housing authority for submission to the state. Each housing authority must contract with an external auditor, but must not use the same auditor for more than 5 consecutive years without a waiver. DHCD will develop a voluntary regional public housing innovation program open to up to 4 regional housing authorities, with the goal of achieving innovative models for public housing development and management. DHCD will also implement a centralized waitlist for state-aided public housing within a year.

Click here for a copy of the housing authority bill
http://malegislature.gov/Bills/188/House/H4374

$2.2 BILLION ENVIRONMENTAL BOND BILL

The Legislature enacted a sweeping $2.2 billion environmental bond bill that includes a broad range of resources that cities and towns can access, if the Administration releases the funds under its capital plan.  The initiatives include: $49 million for dam removal and repair; $120 million for coastal infrastructure projects; $111 million for urban parks; increases in conservation tax credits to facilitate local land preservation; and a provision sponsored by Sen. Richard Moore to require DEP to report to the Legislature on the costs created by the new Sustainable Water Management Initiative (SWMI) regulations.

Click here for a copy of the environmental bond bill
http://malegislature.gov/Bills/188/House/H4375

WATER INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE BILL

The Legislature’s water infrastructure finance bill would add $50 million to the state revolving loan fund administered by the Water Pollution Abatement Trust (now renamed the Clean Water Trust).  Currently, the SRF program is capped at $88 million a year, and the bill would raise the program up to $138 million.  In the past, the WPAT did not release all available funds, and this legislation requires the state to release at least 80% to cities and towns. Further, the program will provide subsidized loans and/or principal forgiveness to more communities due to the increased capacity.  The bill also includes, at local option, the ability for communities to assess up to a 3% property tax surcharge to raise funds for water infrastructure related projects.  Unfortunately, the final bill did not include “water banking,” an innovative funding mechanism that would allow communities to create additional capacity for economic growth by charging fees to fund necessary water and sewer infrastructure improvements for new developments.  The Senate included water banking in its version of the bill, but the House, under pressure from the development community, balked and with time running out in the session, the measure did not remain in the bill.  The MMA will continue to prioritize this important tool.

Click here for a copy of the water infrastructure finance bill
http://malegislature.gov/Bills/188/Senate/S2342

SOLAR NET METERING BILL

Cities and towns have been very successful in promoting important solar energy projects, so successful that municipalities are now being stalled because of the statutory limit in the amount of solar energy that can be returned to the grid or sold to the utilities.  The statutory cap on “net metering” needs to be lifted in order to make additional solar projects viable.  Municipalities, environmentalists and solar developers joined forces to remove the cap on solar net metering, but some large utilities resisted strongly.  In the end, the Legislature passed a compromise bill that would offer a temporary solution by raising the net metering cap by enough to allow those municipal projects that have been stalled to now go forward.  However, it is expected that this problem will re-emerge next year, which will renew calls for a permanent solution.

Click here for a copy of the solar net metering bill
http://malegislature.gov/Bills/188/House/H4385

MMA ANALYZING “SHIFT SWAPPING” COLLECTIVE BARGAINING BILL

With breakneck speed, the Legislature acted in the final hours of the session to pass S. 1218, Sen. Ken Donnelly’s bill that would make shift swapping a subject of collective bargaining under Chapter 150E of the General Laws.  The bill was strongly supported by the fire unions, and had been lodged in the Senate Ways and Means Committee until the last day of the session.  The bill simply includes “employee and employee exchange of tours” in the list of items subject to collective bargaining under section 7 of Chapter 150E.  The MMA is analyzing the potential impact, and expressing its concern over the measure with the Governor’s office.

MSH legislation scheduled for signing 8/2

Email from Bill Massaro about the Medfield State Hospital land urchase bill being lined up on teh Governor’s desk for signing on 8/2/14.  Who knew that bills get assigned signing dates a week in advance.

FYI,

Here  is the link to legislation on the Governor’s desk:

http://www.mass.gov/governor/legislationeexecorder/update/

 

According to the latest (7/28) posting, the MSH Purchase is scheduled for action on August 2.

On the Governor’s Desk

Update on legislation on the Governor’s desk for review and action.

All Legislation on the Governor’s Desk

6.  H. 4216, “An Act Authorizing the Commissioner of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance to Convey Certain Parcels of Land in the Town of Medfield”

                       Sponsors: Rep. Garlick and Sen. Timility

                        Action Due: 08/02/2014

Bill


 

MSH purchase passed

Both branches of the legislature within the past hour passed the legislation to allow the Town of Medfield to buy the Medfield Sate Hospital site.   John Nunnari tracks things at the legislature for the architects, and has an alert for bill passage (a copy of John’s email trail appears below).  John Harney also had a call from Senator Timilty to advise once the Senate had passed the bill.

Now just the Governor’s signature is needed, and the purchase can then happen soon.


7/23/2014 2:35PM
RE: HB4216
Nunnari, John
===========================================================
Senate just enacted.

The bill will now be placed before the Governor.

john
From: MassTrac Bill Action Alert [mailto:noreply@instatrac.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 2:02 PM
To: John Nunnari
Subject: HB4216

HB4216<http://www.instatrac.com/Class_Controller_Main.php?value=219356&type=billma&loadtype=main&email=true&gt; – House Ways and Means – An Act authorizing the commissioner of Capital Asset Management and Maintenance to convey certain parcels of land in the town of Medfield
Action: 07/23/14 – H – Enacted in the House (148/0)

MSH bill passage can come any day now

Passage of the legislation to allow Medfield to purchase the former Medfield State Hospital site from the state may be passed any day now, but reportedly before the end of the month when this legislative session ends.

Bill Massaro’s emailed status update on the legislation appears below.  John Harney reported to me last night that from his regular discussions with Senator Timilty, that passage can happen any day now, just depending upon the press of the many other bills seeking action before the legislature’s session ends on July 31.


Update from the MA Legislature website this afternoon

 
Date Branch Action
6/23/2014 House Reported from the committee on House Ways and Means
6/23/2014 House Pending new draft of H4107
6/23/2014 House New draft of H4107
6/23/2014 House Ordered to a third reading
6/26/2014 House Read third and passed to be engrossed
6/27/2014 Senate Read; and referred to the committee on Senate Ways and Means
7/21/2014 Senate Committee recommended ought to pass
7/21/2014 Senate Rules suspended
7/21/2014 Senate Read second, ordered to a third reading, read third and passed to be engrossed
7/22/2014 House Emergency preamble adopted
7/22/2014 Senate Emergency preamble adopted

My understanding of engrossment is that it is the final reconciliation of amendments made as the bill progressed through House & Senate.

 

The original draft’s Emergency Preamble had been deleted in error at some point in its earlier progress thru the House.   The  House (Denise Garlick) subsequently amended the bill  to add the Emergency Preamble back in.. According to the MA Legislature website, this was the only amendment made..

 

As I understand the process, next step is preparation of the the legislative document for final pasage.  This passage is via 2/3 approvals in  roll call votes  in the House and Senate.  As reported yesterday, passage could be any day now…

 

Bill