Monthly Archives: December 2012

Gov. cuts budgets & seeks power to reduce local aid

PATRICK CUTS SPENDING BY $225 MILLION, WILL SEEK POWER TO CUT LOCAL AID

By Michael Norton and Matt Murphy
STATE HOUSE NEWS SERVICE

STATE HOUSE, BOSTON, DEC. 4, 2012…..As part of a plan to address an estimated $540 million mid-year budget gap, Gov. Deval Patrick on Tuesday slashed spending by $225 million and asked the Legislature to allow him to unilaterally reduce unrestricted local aid to cities and towns by 1 percent.

Unrestricted local aid pays for local services, such as public safety budgets, and is delivered separately from state aid to fund local education spending, which is not targeted for cuts under Patrick’s plan.

“I don’t think this is draconian. Obviously every city and town worries about an impact on their local aid, but as I say this is relatively modest. We are spreading the pain as broadly as possible and sensible and we have a solution for closing that gap in unrestricted local aid if the Lottery continues to help,” Patrick said.

The spending cuts ordered by the governor will hit nursing homes, special education funding, school transportation for the homeless and reimbursement rates for hospitals that treat low-income patients.

Patrick is asking to trim local aid by $9 million, and said if Lottery revenue exceeds expectations the surplus would be used to restore the reduced funding at the end of the year.

Senate budget chief Stephen Brewer told the News Service Monday that he did not sense an appetite within the Legislature to grant the governor local aid-cutting powers. Lawmakers are scheduled to return to Beacon Hill in January, when the governor’s proposal will await their attention.

Patrick used his existing budget management powers to reduce $225 million in spending through so-called 9C cuts, a 1 percent reduction to the total state budget that will result in the defunding of 700 positions in state government and, according to the governor, affect services to the state’s “most vulnerable” residents.

Patrick is also calling for $200 million to be drawn from the state’s $1.65 billion rainy day account to plug holes and prevent deeper spending cuts amid a weak economic recovery.

Patrick called on Congress to address the “fiscal cliff” this year, blaming uncertainty over scheduled tax hikes and spending cuts for private sector angst about expanding and the future of the economy.

“By all accounts that uncertainty and the resulting slowdown in economic growth is the direct cause of our budget challenges. Economists agree that the fiscal cliff is keeping a tremendous amount of capital on the sidelines,” Patrick said.

Patrick said $300 million this fiscal year and $1 billion in the next fiscal year is at risk for state budget writers depending on the outcome of negotiations between President Obama and Congressional leaders. “The cost of inaction is immense,” he said.

The state budget is also facing significant and still unknown costs associated with an evidence tampering debacle that has forced public officials to revisit thousands of drug cases previously thought to be settled.

Spending on Medicaid, the state’s largest program, is a perennial concern and administration officials said they are on track to meet or exceed roughly $500 million anticipated savings in that program and $730 million in overall health care savings associated with Medicaid and other health insurance programs.

Though not as bad as past years during the depths of the recession, Patrick said the state’s budget problems are “serious” and could worsen depending on federal machinations.

After a disappointing month of tax collections in October opened a $256 million budget gap four months into the fiscal year, November revenues rebounded slightly and came in $21 million above projections, but still $235 million short for the year to date.

Under the cuts Patrick announced, no agencies will see budgets reduced below fiscal 2012 levels.

Administration and Finance Secretary Jay Gonzalez said administration officials now believe tax collections this fiscal year will total $515 million less than the administration and legislative budget writers assumed when they compiled this year’s $32.5 billion budget.

Gonzalez officially lowered the state’s expected tax take this year to $21.496 billion, and said he expects the state to collect $381 million more than in fiscal 2012 but $515 million less than estimates made last December and used to build the budget.

Gonzalez expects tax collections to slightly rebound over the final seven months of fiscal 2013.

Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation President Michael Widmer, who monitors budget developments on behalf of the business-backed group, said he agreed with Patrick’s revised state revenue estimate.

“The budget-cutting steps, while painful, are certainly necessary,” Widmer said.

Widmer identified the impact of the midyear budget problems on the fiscal 2014 budget as the “larger issue,” estimating about $800 million in onetime revenues in the fiscal 2013 budget won’t be available for fiscal 2014, which begins on July 1, 2013.

“That’s a huge hole the state faces for fiscal ’14,” Widmer said.

Roughly speaking, Widmer said, the state budget has been under pressure through three years associated with the recent recession and the last two years which have featured modest economic growth, with rainy day fund and federal stimulus law funds driven into the budget and coupled with major spending cuts.

“It is the longest period of fiscal pressures of this magnitude,” Widmer said. “The economic recovery has been so weak both nationally and here that we haven’t had much in the way of revenues. That’s the sad reality. This is now the fifth year.”

A $20 million salary reserve to provide raises to human service workers is not being reduced, Gonzalez said. “It is available to disburse to human service workers,” he said.

Patrick is also calling on leaders of the other two branches of government, the legislative and judiciary, to agree to 1 percent cuts to their own budgets for a savings of $25 million.

The current budget problems don’t require additional revenues, Patrick said, while suggesting his upcoming long-term transportation financing plan would feature new revenues.

The governor’s budget plan also defers $20 million in sales tax revenue that would have gone to the Massachusetts School Building Authority to the general fund, and makes cuts to budgeted hospital rate increases, special education and veteran benefit accounts.

Gonzalez said hospital rate increases for providers caring for certain MassHealth patients would be reduced by $52 million, a special education increase would be cut from $28 million to $17 million, and $1.3 million would be trimmed from veterans’ benefits due to decreased caseloads.

Municipal regionalization grants and budgeted increases in nursing home rates will also be decreased.

Gonzalez said the state has realized about $113 million in savings from lower than expected borrowing costs, of which $20 million will be used to offset the revenue gap. The supplemental budget to be filed by Patrick asking for 1 percent cuts in non-executive branches of government and local aid also proposes to spend the remaining $93 million from debt service savings on caseload driven accounts like homelessness.

Geoffrey Beckwith, executive director of the Massachusetts Municipal Association, said cuts to special education reimbursements, school transportation and local aid will impact municipal budgets mid-year and be difficult to address for cities and towns.

Noting cuts to local aid that have built up over several years, Beckwith said, “This is an additional cut of $9 million opening up question marks for every single community’s budget.” He said the MMA will ask the Legislature not to approve the cut in unrestricted local aid.

“They’ll have to take reductions in programs and services. The 1 percent sounds small but it will destabilize current budgets in place and have communities have to take action. They cannot wait,” Beckwith said.

For detailed information about the spending cuts, go to: http://www.mass.gov/anf/budget-taxes-and-procurement/state-budget/fy13-budget-info/fy13-budget-cut-information

END
12/04/2012

Energy Committee 10/25/12 minutes

Energy Committee Meeting Minutes

October 25, 2012, 7:30 P.M. Town Hall

Present: Marie Nolan, Cynthia Greene, Lee Alinsky, Fred Davis, Charles Kellner, David Temple, Osler Peterson, Michael Sullivan and David Cressman, guest.

Chairman Nolan called the meeting to order at 7:35 pm.

I. Accept minutes of last meeting – September 27, 2012 Minutes by Mike Sullivan were accepted.

II. Dartmouth Energy Efficiency/Renewable Energy Strategies Discussion with Town of Dartmouth Administrator

David Cressman, Town Administrator of Dartmouth, MA shared his experiences regarding that town’s successful renewable energy activities. He had previously been in Tewksbury. In Dartmouth, an energy committee was started around 2000 by his predecessor; the committee had significant engineering talent. The focus was wind, thinking it would provide biggest bang for buck. But around 3 yrs ago, it had become “a runaway locomotive”; they were looking at 80-100 meter turbines; that was too high, as it was in a flight path; also too close to wetlands, zoning issues, then financing. The reward looked ok, but with low confidence, only 50%, meaning high risk. At 80-90% confidence, the picture was much less rosy; plus noise concerns. Was heading for 8 MW. Switched from town-owned to a firm-owned project which would sell electricity to town. However, no wind developments ensued.

Switched focus to installing PV (photovoltaic) on capped landfill. Got town meeting approval to lease land for 20 years. By this point, there were many wind opponents who easily became solar proponents. Gave solar farm companies as-of-right in any zone in Town. Asked for RFPs, considered quality, experience, price.

Developments in the past 3 years:

  • 1.8MW ConEd [ConEdison Development] in industrial park; 20-acre parcel, 10-acre plant.
  • 2.6MW ConEd in residential Hicksville area, problems with residents, demanded special town meeting.
  • 1.3MW Borrego [Borrego Solar Systems] on Reed Rd. Sports field, abutting residential, no problems.
  • 1.4MW Borrego on landfill. Town agrees to buy back electricity at $.08 / KWH, no inflation for 20 years. Attorney General, according to 40A Sect 3, asked for consideration (?).
  • 6.2MW EMI [Energy Management Inc.], “Cape Wind company” at Energy Park, paying $.099 / KWH.
  • 3.4MW Borrego at High Hill.
  • 6.0MW No-Fossil [No Fossil Fuel] on Fisher Rd.

Electricity consumption for Dartmouth, municipal uses only, comes to 10MW. Town is buying this electricity, meaning for municipal uses, from the developers. Buying at $.08 / KWH, credit from Nstar for $.12 / KWH, therefore net $.04 / KWH cost (?). Developer sells (? or attempting to sell?) other production to area companies, after reaching capacity of sales to town. Developer is getting tax credits; making most of their money in the first 7 years, depreciation allowance. Town is also making money from leasing the land.

To do all this, Cresman highly recommends a specialist attorney. He successfully used Mark C. Kalpin, Partner, and Co-Chair of the Cleantech and Energy Group at WilmerHale, who “has a boutique business specializing in this.”

One concern is what if the support for net metering should shift? Either then would negotiate a new price, or could break the contract after paying the “terminal value.”

There is a market for Solar RECs [Solar Renewable Energy Certificate] – investments in solar projects The “Department of Energy Resources (DOER) has carved-out a portion of the RPS Class I Renewable Energy requirement to support distributed solar photovoltaic (PV) energy facilities, as provided by the Green Communities Act of 2008” – see their website for more info at:

http://www.mass.gov/eea/energy-utilities-clean-tech/renewable-energy/solar/rps-solar-carve-out/

Dartmouth insisted that developers pay taxes, not PILOT (payment in lieu of taxes).  The Town now reached capacity for distributed generation.  Currently projecting ~$7 million in electricity savings over 20 years from these photovoltaic projects (compare that previously they had been thinking about ~$3 million from wind).  Projects must have a 30-foot vegetative buffer, and a 75-foot setback. There have been a couple of MA towns like Falmouth who “also got out of control in wind.”

Discussion followed about possible application for Medfield. Pete asked are there 20-acre parcels in Medfield that could potentially be solar generation energy sites? Answers:

  • It will be maybe ~10 yrs until Medfield’s landfill is available.
  • There are about 40 acres available behind Wheelock.
  • The wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) is about 2.1 acres, already fenced in and remote (Marie: TGE can do a quick feasiblity assessment; Mike will talk with head of the WWTP). The price of land in Medfield is probably different because parts of Dartmouth are older strip-malls and dormant industrial areas. Medfield’s municipal electricity bill is $1.1 million / yr.

III. Report out on WWTP audit findings

Mike reported out on the results of the energy audit of the Wastewater Treatment Plant which was presented to the Selectmen and interested parties by NSTAR and its contractor Horizon Solutions on October 29, 2012.  The energy audit was a result of the town’s application to MA DOER for assistance with energy conservation strategies at the WWTP.

Mike reported that of all the 23 WWTP plants in the state, municipal and regional, that were audited, DOER concluded that Medfield’s was the most energy efficient! And we’re doing it all without state or federal subsidy or financing. Energy bill is ~$9000 / month. There is talk of new technology from Europe which might eventually allow the WWTP to be even more efficient.

IV. MEC follow-up to Town Charter and Bylaw Committee request

Marie wrote letter as discussed.

V. MEC/Medfield Green Winter Series on Energy Issues

  • First session: January 17 at Library, 7:00 – 8:30 pm on residential energy conservation and efficiency. Can Pasi from Sagewell come to explain infrared pictures to residents and next steps? Maybe NStar Green presentation? Consider explaining how to use kill-a-watt meters in a home? Marie will followup with Medfield Green.
  • Second session: February 28 at Library to focus on renewables, esp. individual homeowners’ experiences such as Chief of Police converting home to solar; Anna Mae O’Shea Brooke’s home conversion to  geothermal.
  • Third session: April 7 at Harmony Center to focus on electromagnetic emissions (EMFs) from technoloical advances (including smart meters) and how they affect us.  This program is being sponsored by Medfield Green and The Harmony Center.

VI. Sagewell Mass Thermal Imaging Initiative Update

David Temple wrote an article which was published in Medfield Press Friday October 12: “Utilizing Thermal Imaging Can Save You Energy, Cash: Time’s Running Out on Free Energy-Saving Programs.”

VII. Set Date and Agenda for next meeting

Thursday, November 29, 2012.

Minutes respectfully submitted by Fred Davis, thanks for help from Marie Nolan and Mike Sullivan.

Energy Committee 11/12/12 meeting minutes

Medfield Energy Committee
November 29, 2012 Meeting Minutes

Attending: Lee Alinsky, Fred Bunger, Cynthia Green, Marie Nolan,
Pete Peterson, Mike Sullivan, David Temple, Ryan McLaughlin

1. Minutes of October 25, 2012 meeting were approved.

2. Reviewed TGE analysis of Solar PV installations of 0.7 and 2.3
acres at Wastewater Treatment Plant. Both have same payout of
11.7 years based on assumed electricity cost of $.18/kWh and a
return of $.20/kWh from the sale of REC’s. The WWTP energy use
averages 58,000 kWh/month at an average cost of $9,313/month or energy cost of $.159/kWh. Marie will have the analysis updated
using current electricity pricing.

3. MEC is collaborating with Medfield Green on a Energy
Conservation and Alternative Energy series in January and February (possibly March). The first session is January 17. Speakers include Patsi Miettinen, Sagewell president, perhaps Next Step Living, Dan Ruben (energy use reduction speaker and Director of Boston Green Tourism), and residents who have implemented alternative energy projects on their homes such as Chief Meaney and Anna May O’Shea-Brooks. Marie will contact Medfield Green about the content of Dan Ruben’s talk.

4. DOER Clean Energy Grant Program Solicitation to help
communities with planning. Mike Sullivan will send a letter of intent to DOER regarding Medfield interest in solar PV at the wastewater
treatment plant.

5. As part of the solicitation for interest in the solar PV at the
wastewater treatment plant, MEC feels it would be useful for the
potential vendors to look at other Town property and buildings and
provide proposals where feasible.

6. A December holiday get-together is tentatively planned for
December 18 or 19 at Marie Nolan’s.

f. bunger 11/30/12

Warrant Committee seeks members

The town's moderator, Scott McDermott, said today that he is still looking to fill open positions on the Warrant Committee.  Contact him if you are willing to help the town vet its budgets for the upcoming budget season that ends with the town meeting on the last Monday in April.  The Warrant Committee tends to meet weekly at this time of year.