Category Archives: Medfield State Hospital

3/9 meeting with DCAM re MSH

Mike, Kris and I met with DCAM Commissioner Cornelison about the Medfield State Hospital on 3/9.  She wanted to share with us ahead of the meeting last Thursday their plans, but she also told us at that time that she is willing to sell the Medfield State Hospital to the Town of Medfield.  I first needed to share what I learned with the Board of Selectmen at our 3/20 meeting, before writing about it here.

Clean up –

My notes were that –

  • their cap and cover plan would cost $3.86 m., including the 30 years of monitoring.
  • our requested removal of the materials up to pipeline would cost $7.36 m.
  • our requested removal of the materials up to pipeline with on-site storage of the materials would cost $12.95 m.
  • full removal would cost $16.99 m. (which includes an estimate of $3-5 m. to Spectra to move its pipeline).

Commissioner Cornelison raised the issue of DCAM’s willingness to consider reimbursing the town for our extraordinary costs for environmental experts, development consultants, and an on-site clerk of the works type person. That remains to get worked out.

Purchase by town was announced as a possibility –

  • payments could be over time
  • some payment only if and when town develops site
  • state will seek recovery of its sunk costs in the price it charges

The Commissioner promised to share with us the documents that outline the terms they used with similar sales to other towns.

Feasibility study –

DCAM has already committed to doing the feasibility study, so it will continue.  Mass Development could try to attract for profit uses.  One existing college has expressed some interest, in addition to the start up college that has already expressed interest.  A life science facility was mentioned as a possibility.  We agreed to proceed on all fronts – the clean up track, the development track, and the town purchase track.

 

Selectmen meet Friday about offered mediation of MSH clean up

The Board of Selectmen will meet Friday at 4:30 PM to discuss the proposed mediation with DCAM of the clean up at the Medfield State Hospital that was offered by DCAM Commissioner Carole Cornelison at last Thursday’s heated meeting.   On Monday I got the email below as a follow up about the proposed mediation.  The mediator looks good to me.  The Town of Medfield cannot always move fast, and we have already missed the first deadline DCAM tried to set for us.

=========================================

Hello everyone,

Last week’s PIP meeting was a great dialogue on the matter of DCAM’s C&D Area Remedial Action Plan – beyond the opportunities already provided in the agreed-upon PIP process.  DCAM welcomes further input from the Town and other parties, while also cognizant of its responsibility not to unnecessarily delay the remedial work.

One important option that was offered by Commissioner Cornelison was the opportunity to engage in mediation.  This proposition would include representatives of the Town and DCAM representatives.  DCAM would proceed with its planned PIP and permitting efforts.  Hopefully a remediation of one or more sessions will allow for a reasonable compromise as to the approach.  It should be scheduled as quickly as possible.  (Keeping to this schedule is necessary to enable us to apply for the necessary permits so that if during mediation if we are able to come to some agreement, we are in a position to go forward with the work this construction season.)

We suggest that there be a limit of 3-5 Medfield representatives and 3-5 DCAM reps.  We ask that you identify these participants by the end of business Wednesday, if possible and provide us with that list.  In the meantime, we will begin exploring potential dates with the proposed mediator, John Wofford (http://www.mwi.org/wofford-municipal-bio.html).

We look forward to your cooperation and response.  Please contact me if you should have any questions.

Sincerely,

Sandra

Sandra R. Duran

Director of Building Maintenance and Operations

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Division of Capital Asset Management

Medfield State Hospital meeting last night

The DCAM meeting at the Town House was attended by an overflowing, hot, and angry crowd of what I estimate to be 80-100 residents last night.  DCAM was presenting its final analysis of the issues and the clean up options it has chosen, but the meeting quickly got sidetracked from the planned agenda to deal with citizen anger over DCAM failing to totally remove the toxic materials dumped along the river over decades by DMH.  The C&D area is about 3.2 acres in size, and the materials are up to fifteen feet deep.

None of what DCAM presented last night was a surprise, as DCAM has been holding meetings with the parties over the past several weeks.  Mike, Kris and I heard the same results when we met with the Commissioner two weeks ago.  I had already reported on what we were then told at the Board of Selectmen on Tuesday this week, and also the big news that the Commissioner is now willing to sell the Medfield State Hospital to the town.  The details of what that would cost and how the payments would be made over time, with a balloon at the time of its development will all come later as we explore that purchase option further with DCAM.

The Medfield Selectmen have taken the position that the toxic materials should be removed up to the gas pipeline,  and DCAM last night confirmed its plan to cap and cover most of those materials in place.  DCAM did announce that the armored bank in prior plans had been changed to a bio-engineered bank, making for a more natural looking river bank, which was universally praised by those in attendance.

I was interested to see that the cost of the town sought option does not appear to be that different than the DCAM option (see slide 33 on the attached materials, if you can read the fine print), however, the cost were not discussed in any detail last night, so that discussion will have to happen another time.  DCAM’s option seems to top out at $3.9 m. versus the town option at $7.4 m., but DCAM’s option requires thirty years at least of monitoring, as cost that bridges a lot of that cost difference.    From memory I think the monitoring was going to cost upwards of $1.6 m.  Senator Timilty said last night that the state just needs to step up an pay to do the clean up right, whatever it costs, so if the legislature authorizes the monies, we can get it done.

I have attached the DCAM handout materials, for your information and review – https://medfield02052.blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/20120322-dcam-meeting-meterials.pdf

Consultant hired for 40B and MSH

Kristine Trierweiler, Assistant Town Administrator, just notified me that the Town of Medfield has retained  as our consultant on 40B issues (and MSH issues) the person she had recommended:   “Judi Barrett and the firm she works for Community Opportunities Group. They are very interested in assisting the Town in the review of the 40B and will attend the meeting with Gatehouse . . . I have also had discussions with her firm regarding assistance with the feasibility study/impact analysis review of the State Hospital project and they are interested in consulting with us on that as well.”

Clarke Building at Medfield State Hospital being demolished

The Clarke Building at Medfield State Hospital now has a fence around it, which I assume is a prelude to its demolition.  Last Friday when Mike, Kris and I met with DCAM Commissioner Carole Cornelison and her staff at DCAM’s office, they told us that the demolition was going forward.  It had been planned years ago, but apparently got delayed while DCAM was doing the clean up.  I asked why only the Clarke Building was coming down, and was told that DCAM has to deal with Mass Historic to take down any others.

Mike also tells me that the Framingham Police Department will be using the Medfield State Hospital site for exercises soon.

More on our discussions with DCAM will be coming soon.

40B meeting

Last night I attended the first quarter of Big Blue’s basketball playoff game, and the 40B informational meeting.  There was a huge turn out for the latter, as I would estimate that the Middle School auditorium was half to 2/3 full for the 40B meeting.  The basketball game did have a both a larger and noisier crowd, if not a better outcome.

It was a truly  impressive citizen turn out for the 40B meeting, and I thank all who attended for their interest and commitment to a major town issue.  Town counsel, Mark Cerel, ran the meeting, and was ably assisted by knowledgeable municipal law attorneys Barbara St. Andre of Pettrini Associates of Framingham and former Medfield resident, Jason (Jay) Talerman of Blatman, Bobrowski & Mead, L.L.C. of Millis.

The three attorneys explained and laid out the legal background of 40B, the processes by which 40B projects get permitted, and the options open to towns when presented by a 40B project.  Representative Denise Garlick told the forum that she has no position on the pending 40B, contrary to press reports, and that $15,000 of consultant monies are available by state grant.  She had previously reported to me after her investigation of the grants, that it is “highly likely” that Medfield would get those grant monies if we applied.  In a light moment, attorney Talerman, who grew up in Medfield, said that despite his age that he still had to address his former Medfield High School teacher as “Mr. DeSorgher,” when Richard DeSorgher questioned the validity of arguing against the 40B proposal due to the loss of the industrially zoned land.  Representatives of Gatehouse, the company proposing to build a 96 unit 40B complex on West Street attended, but did not want to address the meeting.

After the attorneys exhausted everyone’s questions about 40B, they turned the podium over to the Board of Selectmen and Bill Massaro for a quick update about the status of the Medfield State Hospital reuse and clean up.  The state is starting up a new feasibility study to determine what uses can be made of the site as part of the fresh look at alternatives, and there continues to be a basic disagreement between the state and the town over whether the clean up of the C & D area waste can be accomplished by the state’s proposed cap and cover versus the town’s suggested removal.

My wife Deb told me this morning that the electronic sign board was still in front of the Town House this morning advertising a 40B meeting “this evening” so perhaps people will show up again tonight.

Next steps –

1 – At the last Board of Selectmen meeting I proposed that the Board of Selectmen initiate the appointment of a resident study committee to look into what the town should be doing about our affordable housing and to report back with a suggested action plan for the town.  Ann and Mark wanted to consider that proposal.  If they do agree to move forward with that idea, then we will be looking for volunteers to serve.

2 – Also, it seems to me that it would be easy to get town agreement on building  a Tilden Village extension on the land next to Tilden Village, so we should start to explore that possibility right away.  The current Medfield Housing Authority board chair and executive director have both expressed a willingness to talk about doing so, and I will reach out to begin discussions with them on how that could be done.

MSH feasibility study starting

DCAM’s Joe Ruhl kindly called me this afternoon to let me know that DCAM is about to proceed with its feasibility study, during which local realtors will be getting calls.  I asked Joe to please follow up on the promise that was made earlier to me personally by Dana Herrell of DCAM, to give Medfield a place at the table in that feasibility study.

I also mentioned to Joe my disappointment that DCAM and Medfield no longer seemed to be working collaboratively on the Medfield State Hospital project.  I mentioned that the Board of Selectmen had vote at our last meeting to retain legal counsel to lay out Medfield’s options in light of our disagreement with the DCAM’s cap and cover clean up proposal.  I suggested that mediation, or our merely talking to each other, might be a much better way to see if we could agree to resolve our different opinions on the best clean up of the Medfield State Hospital C & D site.

Finally, I asked Joe if I was right that our two different clean up solutions cost about $4.1 m. versus $5 m., and I opined that if those numbers were right, that we should somehow be able to bridge such a gap.

DCAM cancels 3/8 PIP meeting

The 2/27 email below from Sandra Durand of DCAM cancelled their PIP meeting scheduled for 3/8 –

==========================================

I wanted to let you know that today, we decided to cancel the March 8th meeting as the draft Phase III required more editing/writing.  We want to make sure that we provide a good readable document and at this point are electing to take the extra time needed to accomplish this.   We will apprise you and the PIP group of our anticipated schedule of delivery of the Final Draft Phase III.  Our next scheduled PIP meeting is on March 22nd.  We will let you know as soon as possible of any change to this schedule.

Formal notification of the March 8thmeeting postponement to the PIP Group will go out tomorrow, February 28, 2012.

Give me a call if you have any questions.

Sandra

Sandra R. Duran

Director of Building Maintenance and Operations

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Division of Capital Asset Management

One Ashburton Place, 16th Floor

Boston, Massachusetts 02108

617-727-4050 x454 (telephone)

857-321-0467 (cell)

617-727-5363 (fax)

DCAM to town, last night, “no to your changes”

Last night DCAM held the continued technical meeting (continued from last week) by means of its newly enlarged (five LSP’s) collection of environmental clean up experts, and we still did not get through all the town’s issues.  A second continued technical meeting will be held at 7 PM on 2/9/12, with a PIP meeting announced by DCAM for 3/8/12.

What I heard through all the lengthy presentations by DCAM was first and foremost that they are not budging one iota at this time on the town’s main request, that the hospital refuse that was dumped by DMH for decades into the Charles River  be removed where it is below ground water levels – the town is concerned for the long run about having those waste materials located under water within the aquifer that serves town well #6.

If I were to bet, based on the trajectory of the current process, unless DCAM is willing to discuss with the town other resolutions, I would guess that DCAM will only agree to one of the town’s secondary requests, that being to re-build the river bank with a bio-engineered solution, instead of the with granite blocks.

However, if DCAM is willing to continue informal talks, I am hopeful that if we can both have real discussions, instead of what feel like these pre-litigation meetings we have been having, and also that the town and DCAM can come to an agreement that works for both sides.  DCAM told me months ago that the costs of our removal solution ($5m) was not that different than their capping solution ($1.5m), once the cost of monitoring ($2.6m for the first 30 years) the capped site forever is added in – I am assuming that the cost to monitor from 30 years out to forever makes up the difference.

Clark Bld demolition delayed until spring

New materials recently supplied by DCAM indicate that their planned demolition of the Clark Building at the Medfield State Hospital has been delayed until this spring.  One can already see where bricks have been removed at some corners of the building, which I am told is done to get an idea of the structure to determine how to do the demolition.