Category Archives: Budgets

Senate budget numbers

From John Nunnari –

Senate budget numbers for local aide. $1391 higher than what was passed in the House, and $90,042 higher than what was proposed by the Governor.

John

Municipality/Regional District

7061-0008 Chapter 70

Unrestricted General Government Aid
FY ’12 Actual Appropriation

$5,620,214.00

$1,137,437.00

Governors FY ’13 Proposal

$5,620,214.00

$1,137,437.00

Medfield (House FY ’13 Engrossed Numbers)

$5,730,534.00

$1,226,088.00

Medfield (Senate FY ’13 Proposed Numbers)

$5,730,534.00

$1,227,479.00

FY ’13 Conference Committee Report

$0.00

$0.00

John Nunnari, Assoc AIA
Executive Director, AIA MA

MMA Bulletin article on OPEB

Read with lunch today – the Massachusetts Municipal Association’s April Bulletin has an article on the “other post-emloyment benefit” (OPEB) costs, which are mainly health insurance.  Medfield’s unfunded OPEB health insurance liability is about $43 m., and the Board of Selectmen has agreed to look into what to do about it.

MMA’s article states that most towns have not funded OPEB, and are merely paying for it as they go along.  I understand that while we are not funding the liability, the liability is also growing larger each year at a substantial rate – $1.5 m. this past year is what Mike said.

The article says that any funding town sets aside can be invested with the State Retiree Benefits Trust Fund (which has $49 b. in funds), which gets one the benefits of a large scale investment, without the management costs and/or risks of dealing with a small amount.

Dwindling tobacco cash puts state bonds in jeopardy.

From my daily American Association for Justice email –

tobacco cash puts state bonds in jeopardy.

The New York Times (5/4, Walsh, Subscription Publication) reports, “Steady declines in smoking, a big win for public health, are creating problems for municipal bond investors.” Several bonds “backed by yearly payments from tobacco companies under a landmark settlement with 46 states are in the earliest stages of default, and more distress is expected.” The Times adds, “Dozens of states, counties and cities issued the bonds to receive billions of dollars upfront from the 1998 settlement,” but are seeing smaller-than-expected payments as US tobacco sales decline. The Times also notes a renewed legal dispute between the states and big tobacco firms as the companies withhold nearly $8 billion in settlement payments pending resolution of the legal questions.

DOR’s Div of Local Services on-line comparison of town data

From the e-newsletter from the DOR’s Div of Local Services –

========================

Unveiling the Community Comparison Report

Municipal Data Management and Technical Assistance Bureau

 ;

With the introduction of a new application, local officials and others will now have the ability to create customized community comparison reports directly from the DLS website. Developed by Lisa Juszkiewicz and Mike Briggs of the Municipal Databank, the application is an easy-to-use means of extracting comparative municipal finance and demographic data for multiple communities. Unlike previous sources, the application draws data by direct query of the information that resides in DLS’ Gateway system. As a result, users will have ready access to the most current data available. ;
 ;
Among the strengths of this reporting tool, users can quickly collect and view data for any number of cities and towns they select or regard as peer communities. These selections can be based on traditional peer communities, proximity, county boundaries, or the search can be narrowed by selecting minimum and maximum data ranges for certain criteria.  For example, a search can identify all communities with a population between 10,000 and 20,000 people and with an annual budget between $30 million and $50 million. In addition, other available criteria include average single-family tax bill, EQV per capita and DOR income per capita. The user can set data ranges in one or all criteria.  ;
 ;
The community comparison application automatically extracts extensive pre-selected information for each city and town identified by the search. Eliminated is the often frustrating exercise of opening numerous spreadsheets and sorting, cutting and pasting data from each into a single spreadsheet. With over 65 data elements, the report includes data on assessed valuations, levies and tax rates by class, revenues by source, actual spending, receivables, reserves, debt levels and bond ratings. After the report is generated, the user can export it to Excel with the click of a button. There, it can be refined, sorted and analyzed or the information can be displayed in charts or graphs and pasted into documents or other spreadsheets for presentation. ;
 ;
For local leaders, the community comparison application can be valuable tool for identifying peer communities, measuring performance and establishing benchmarks. For DLS, the ability to directly query Gateway data will eliminate regular, labor intensive updates to static Excel spreadsheets. Looking ahead, DLS hopes to use the underlying community comparison programming as a foundation to produce additional web-based data reporting tools for the benefit of internal and external customers.  ;
 ;
Click here to access the Community Comparison Report application on the DLS website. If you have any questions or comments, please contact the Municipal Databank at databank@dor.state.ma.us.

Cherry Sheets – based on House budget numbers

Below and at https://medfield02052.blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/20120427-cherrysheet-housenumbers.doc

From –

Massachusetts Department of Revenue

Division of Local Services

FY2013 Local Aid Estimates

 

MEDFIELD

 


 

FY2012 Cherry Sheet Estimate

FY2013 Governor’s Budget (H2)

FY2013 HWM Budget

Education:
  Chapter 70

5,620,214

5,620,214

5,730,534

  School Transportation

0

0

0

  Charter Tuition Reimbursement

965

1,765

60

  Smart Growth School Reimbursement

0

0

0

Offset Receipts:
  School Lunch

10,893

10,116

10,116

  School Choice Receiving Tuition

0

0

0

Sub-Total, All Education Items

5,632,072

5,632,095

5,740,710

General Government:
  Unrestricted General Government Aid

1,137,437

1,137,437

1,226,088

  Local Share of Racing Taxes

0

0

0

  Regional Public Libraries

0

0

0

  Urban Renewal Projects

0

0

0

  Veterans’ Benefits

520

13,884

13,333

  State Owned Land

31,347

31,357

31,357

  Exemptions: Vets, Blind, Surviving Spouses& Elderly

26,482

26,472

26,472

Offset Receipts:
  Public Libraries

13,336

13,728

13,728

Sub-Total, All General Government

1,209,122

1,222,878

1,310,978

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated Receipts

6,841,194

6,854,973

7,051,688

 

FY2013 Local Aid Assessments

MEDFIELD

 

 

FY2012 Cherry Sheet Estimate

FY2013 Governor’s Budget (H2)

FY2013 HWM Budget

County Assessments:
County Tax

106,268

108,925

108,925

Suffolk County Retirement

0

0

0

Sub-Total, County Assessments

106,268

108,925

108,925

 

 

 

State Assessments and Charges:

 

 

  Retired Employees Health Insurance

0

0

0

  Retired Teachers Health Insurance

0

0

0

  Mosquito Control Projects

51,322

60,936

60,936

  Air Pollution Districts

4,200

4,280

4,280

  Metropolitan Area Planning Council

3,735

3,788

3,788

  Old Colony Planning Council

0

0

0

  RMV Non-Renewal Surcharge

6,220

6,560

6,560

Sub-Total, State Assessments

65,477

75,564

75,564

 

 

Transportation Authorities:

 

 

  MBTA

246,561

254010

254010

  Boston Metro. Transit District

0

0

0

  Regional Transit

0

0

0

Sub-Total, Transportation Authorities

246,561

254,010

254,010

 

 

 

Annual Charges Against Receipts:

 

 

 

  Special Education

0

0

0

  STRAP Repayments

0

0

0

Sub-Total, Annual Charges

   0

   0

   0

 

 

 

Tuition Assessments

 

 

 

  School Choice Sending Tuition

33,593

10,000

10,000

  Charter School Sending Tuition

10,073

11,136

0

  Essex County Tech Sending Tuition

0

0

0

Sub-Total, Tuition Assessments

43,666

21,136

10,000

 

 

 

 

Total Estimated Charges

461,972

459,635

448,499


 

Town’s future cost for employee health care

This is a report titled “Town of Medfield Other Post-Employment Benefits – Actuarial Valuation – 1/1/2011.”  The report projects the cost to the Town of Medfield of the future health care costs already earned by the town’s current employees and retirees.  Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) are employee benefits that have already been earned.  In our case these are obligations for which the town has not set aside any funds to pay those future costs.  This unfunded town liability on 1/1/2011 appears to have been estimated by the consultant in this report to stand at $39,775, 805.

https://medfield02052.blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/20110101-actuarialvaluation-opeb.pdf

From the report –

Summary of Actuarial Results
The actuarial values in this report were calculated consistent with the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 45, Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions, issued June 2004. Values at two discount rates are presented. The 7.50% discount rate represents the expected rate .of return for a funded plan with a longer-term investment horizon. For an unfunded plan, the GASB Statement No. 45 calls for the use of a discount rate approximating the rate of return of Medfield’s general assets. The rate we recommend for Medfield is 4.25%. The OPEB liability is extremely sensitive to this assumption. Use of the unfunded rate instead of the funded rate causes the Annual Required Contribution (ARC), Accrued Actuarial Liability (AAL), and the Normal Cost to increase dramatically.

The summary results are as follows:
• Actuarial Accrued Liability (” AAL”) is the “price” attrbutable to benefits earned in past years. The total AAL as of January I, 2011 (at 4.25%% discount rate) is $39,775,805.  This is made up of approximately $22.3 million for current active Medfield employees and approximately $17.5 million for Medfield retirees, spouses and survivors.
• The Normal Cost is the “price” attributable to benefits earned in the current year. The Normal Cost as of January 1, 2011 (at the 4.25% discount rate) is approximately $1.9 million.
• Based on a twenty-eight year funding schedule (at the 4.25% discount rate), the Fiscal 2011 contribution would be $3,503,030. This figure is referred to as the Annual Required Contdbution (ARC). This figure should be contrasted with the ARC using the fully funded 7.50% rate and a thirty-year funding schedule of $2,432,940. These compare to the pay-as-you-go contribution of the existing costs for current retirees of $1,234,867. For an illustration of how payment of the ARC impacts the funding of the plan over time, please refer to the “mustrative Funding Schedule” discussion beginning on page 15 and the accompanying table on page 35. The following table shows the breakdown of the Actuarial Accrued Liability between future retirees and current retirees, as well as the normal cost, at Medfield’s different discount rates:

[SEE THE REPORT FOR THE CHART (it did not copy well below)]

Actuarial Results as of ,January 1, 2011 7.50% Rate 4.25% Rate

Current Actives                                                       $12,922,731   $22,309,068

Current Retirees, Beneficiaries, Vesteds ~  $12,881,239 ;  $17,466,737
and Survivors

Total AAL .                                                                  $2~,803,970   $39,775,805

Normal Cost                                                                $979,396            $1,889,948

ARC (uses 28 year amortization for

Unfunded, 30 years for Funded) .                       $2,432,940      $3,503,030

MMA Alert this afternoon on budget passed by House

HOUSE PASSES $32.4B BUDGET

KEY LOCAL AID ACCOUNTS GAIN MILLIONS

PLEASE CALL YOUR SENATORS TODAY TO ENSURE THAT LOCAL AID IS A TOP PRIORITY IN SENATE BUDGET

As the clock neared midnight on Wednesday, April 25, the House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to pass its version of the fiscal 2013 state budget, increasing key local aid accounts by $105 million compared to the budget submitted by the Governor in January.   The Senate Ways and Means Committee is expected to release its own budget proposal in mid-May, and full Senate debate will begin on May 21.

The House budget would increase municipal and school aid by $105 million above the amount proposed by the Governor in January (H. 2).  The House Ways and Means proposal guarantees funding for unrestricted municipal aid at $899 million, adding $65 million to the base Cherry Sheet distribution; adds $18.5 million to Chapter 70 to guarantee $40 per student minimum aid for all cities, towns and school districts; increases the SPED Circuit Breaker by $8.4 million; fully funds homeless student transportation at $11.3 million; and increases regional school transportation by $2 million.  This is great news and a clear sign of the strong commitment of the members of the House to local government.

The Division of Local Services (DLS) has released updated preliminary Cherry Sheets for fiscal 2013 showing aid amounts for individual cities, towns and school districts based on the House budget committee bill.  Local officials can view their preliminary House Cherry Sheets at http://www.mass.gov/dor/local-officials/municipal-data-and-financial-management/cherry-sheets/2013-cherry-sheets/

During the three days of debate in the House, members several passed pro-municipal amendments.  Two stand out.  The first is a comprehensive plan to update and fund the Community Preservation Act (CPA) filed by HW&M Vice-Chair Stephen Kulik and House Minority Leader Bradley Jones.  The CPA amendment would allow cities and towns to use funds to repair and upgrade existing recreation areas, expands the qualifying sources of local fund that can be used for a state match, and increases funding for the state share of the CPA with an annual transfer of $25 million from any end-of-year state budget surplus into the CPA Statewide Trust Fund rather than an increase in the registry of deeds recording fees.  The second amendment would increase funding for the Shannon Anti-Gang program from $2 million to $5.5 million.

In addition, the House members rejected several amendments opposed by the MMA, including amendments that would have diverted local aid to fund the state share of the police career incentive pay program, and another amendment that would have expanded collective bargaining by overriding existing management rights regarding the appointment, promotion, transfer and removal of employees.

The House-passed budget represents real progress for cities and towns, and it is imperative that the Senators embrace these investments in their version of the budget as well.  Vital local aid decisions will be made in the Senate over the next several days, and we are asking local officials to contact their Senators today to make sure that local aid receives the highest priority.

PLEASE CALL YOUR SENATORS AND ASK THEM TO SUPPORT THE LOCAL AID LEVELS PASSED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.

HERE ARE THE KEY POINTS TO EMPHASIZE:

$65 MILLION FOR DIRECT MUNICIPAL AID: The House budget funds the Unrestricted General Government Aid account at $899 million, increasing the base appropriation on the Cherry Sheet by $65 million.  The Governor proposed level-funding UGGA at $834 million, and tentatively providing a later supplemental distribution of $65 million in October if the state ends fiscal 2012 with a surplus.  But with fiscal 2012 state revenues coming in below expectations, the $65 million is not guaranteed under the Governor’s plan, and communities wouldn’t have any idea how much aid, if any, would result in October, making it impossible to include the funds in fiscal 2013 operating budgets.  The House budget would solve this problem by making the $65 million permanent and adding it to the base so that cities and towns can make full use of the funds for ongoing operations and essential services in their fiscal 2013 budgets.

After a municipal aid reduction of nearly $500 million since fiscal 2009, this increase is vitally needed to allow cities and towns to maintain municipal services and avoid higher reliance on the property tax.  It is also important to note that the Committee’s recommendation recognizes the projected increase in state Lottery revenues for fiscal 2012 and 2013, and makes sure that cities and towns receive their Lottery dollars as intended in state law.

MINIMUM AID FOR CHAPTER 70: The House added $18.5 million to Chapter 70 school aid to ensure that all municipalities and districts receive an increase of at least $40 per student next year – under the Governor’s budget only one-third of communities and school districts received any increase, and this plan ensures that every district would receive a boost

SPED CIRCUIT BREAKER: The House added $8.4 million to the special education “circuit beaker” account to get closer to full funding.  Under the Governor’s budget, the state would reimburse only 62% of eligible costs instead of the 75% in the law.  The $8.4 million would increase the reimbursement rate to 68%.

FUNDING THE TRANSPORTATION OF HOMELESS STUDENTS: The House budget fully funds the $11.3 million mandate for homeless student transportation costs triggered by state acceptance of the federal McKinney-Vento Act.  Without this new line-item the state would fail to end this new unfunded mandate.

SUPPORT THE CPA AMENDMENT: The House plan would increase CPA funding by $25 million, and allow cities and towns to leverage their own resources to improve existing recreation areas, purchase open space, protect historic assets, and expand affordable housing.  The amendment reflects popular legislation that a majority of the Senate has co-sponsored in separate legislation.

Should Medfield reconsider a meals tax

The state Dept. Of Revenue’s Cities and Towns email today focuses on the meals tax.  Medfield’s annual town meeting (ATM) voted not to impose the 0.75% local option meals tax a couple of years ago.  I wonder if it is not time to ask the voters once again whether they want to impose the meals tax.  I support the local option tax because:

  • to me, meals at restaurants are more a luxury than a necessity
  • Medfield restaurants draw from out of town, so we would get revenue from non-residents
  • getting those meals tax monies would lower our property taxes
  • we pay that meals tax when we go to restaurants in the 151 cities and town outside of Medfield that have the tax

This was the emailed material from the DOR –

Cities and Towns Have Collected Nearly $500 million in Local Option Meal and Room Taxes Since FY10

Since the local option meals tax took effect in FY10, 151 communities have approved levying the .75 percent local option meals tax in addition to the state’s 6.25 percent meals tax, which has generated more than $150 million in local option revenue for those cities and towns. .  .
And during that same time period, the local option room tax has generated $332.7 million, with 96 communities now choosing to levy a six percent local option.
Those two revenue sources have generated more than $482 million in revenue available for appropriation in cities and towns.
The meals tax has grown each year, from $27.1 million in FY10 to $60.7 million in FY11, and, with the final June distribution yet to come, to $62.3 million in FY12.
The room tax has followed a similar course, growing from $94.5 million in FY10 to $126.0 million in FY11 to $111.6 million in FY12, with the final distribution coming in June sure to push the total revenue ahead of FY11.
These local options are additional tools for the communities that choose to use them in tight fiscal times, and cities and towns have used them to maintain services levels and bridge financial gaps.

Robert G. Nunes
Deputy Commissioner & Director of Municipal Affairs

SJC on Quinn Bill – town only pays its half, not state’s half

The Supreme Judicial Court ruled today in the case of ADAMS v. CITY OF BOSTON held that Massachusetts towns only have to pay half of the  Quinn Bill obligations to the police when the legislature fails to fund the reimbursement, as it has recently done.  Under the Quinn Bill, police got additional pay for additional education, and the state was supposed to reimburse the towns for half of what the towns paid the cops per the Quinn Bill.  Several years ago when the recession hit, the state stopped funding its half of the Quinn Bill, Boston only paid its half, and the police sued to get it all.

“Taking the purpose of the statute into account, we conclude that § 108L requires only that municipalities pay one-half the amounts specified in the payment provision, plus any amount actually received from the Commonwealth. Municipalities may agree to pay more, but the statute does not require it.”

Calling and re-issuing bonds saves town $1.9 m.

Treasurer/Collector Georgia Colivas reported to the selectmen at last night’s Board of Selectmen meeting that her efforts to call and re-issue about $10.225 m. in town bonds will save the town $1.9 m. over the life of the bonds.

The municipal bonds had provisions that prevent them being called for the first ten years, and the town has passed that limit.  Another set of town bonds will pass that threshold this fall, and if rates have not changed, will also be re-issued, saving the town even more monies on the town debt.

The interest rates on the bonds that were re-issued went down from 4.4 – 4.6% to 1.265%.  The bonds were purchased by TD Securities.

The actual issue savings had the town substantially exceeding the preliminary pre-issue estimates that the town would save $1.7 m. on the current re-issue.  Ms. Colivas reported that the recent Moody’s ratings confirmed the town as rated Aa1, allowing the town to benefit from lower interest rates.  The town is reaping the benefits from years of being well run and generally parsimonious in its spending.