Category Archives: Medfield State Hospital

DEP site visit at MSH this Thursday at 1:30 PM

DEP letter to those who appealed the Medfield Conservation Commission’s granting of Orders of Conditions with respect to the DCAM work in and next to the Charles River, in the C&D area.

=====================================

October 6, 2012

Department of Environmental Protection
Central Regional Office
627 Main Street
Worcester, MA 01608
508-792-7650

Wetlands / Medfield
DEP File # 214-580
Request for Departmental Action
Site Meeting Notice
Former Medfield State Hospital

Dear ______ –

The Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) has received your Request for   Departmental Action appealing the Order of Conditions issued by the town of Medfield Conservation Commission to the Massachusetts Division of Capital Asset Management.

MassDEP has scheduled a meeting and site inspection in accordance with Massachuset General Laws, Chapter 131, Section 40 and in preparation for the issuance of a Superseding Order of Conditions.  You and all concerned parties are invited to participate in the site meeting.  The purpose of this site meeting is to determine the significance of the area to the interests of the  Wetlands Protection Act and to informally discuss issues relevant to the referenced project.  I  plan to be at the site on October1 3,2011 at l:30 p.m.

No activity may commence on any portion of the project subject to the jurisdiction of the Wetlands Protection Act, Massachusetts General Laws, C hapter131, Section 40 until all appeal periods have elapsed and all proceeding before the MassDEP h ave been completed, 3l0 CMR  10.05( 7) (k).

Should there be any questions in this matter, you may contact me at5081767-2713.

Sincerely,

Gary Dulmaine
Bureau of Resource Protection
Division of Wetlands and Waterways

Medfield’s Reps’ letter to DCAM

Senator Timilty and Representatives Garlick and  Winslow wrote a joint letter yesterday to DCAM, asking that DCAM withdraw its request to the Army Corps to do work in and near the river, and rather to explore the solution the town has sought.  A copy of their letter can be accessed via this link

Click to access 20110928-garlick-timilty-winslow-lt-dcam.pdf

Article in Taunton Daily Gazette 2 days ago

Update: Army Corps of Engineers still undecided about DCAM permit to
remediate former Medfield State Hospital toxic waste

By Brett M. Rhyne
Wicked Local Medfield
Posted Sep 26, 2011 @ 05:51 PM
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has not yet acted upon the permit application filed with it by the state’s Division of
Capital Asset Management regarding the planned remediation of oil and toxic waste at the former Medfield State Hospital site.
Karen Kirk Adams, chief of the permits and enforcement branch of the New England District of the corps, told the Press that not only
has the permit been neither approved nor denied yet, she could not even estimate when action might be taken on it.
The delay, she said, is due to “clarification on the project” that the corps is seeking from DCAM and the Massachusetts
Department of Environmental Protection, which is mandating DCAM’s actions.
The need for clarifications arose, she said, when the corps met with Medfield’s Board of Selectmen and a number of other Medfield
residents concerned about the remediation on Sept. 19.
A DCAM representative “had been informed of, if not invited to, the meeting,” said board Chairman Osler Peterson. He said the town
had “left it up to the Army Corps of Engineers to invite whomever they wanted from DEP.”
At the meeting, Medfield town officials made their case to the corps that it ought to deny DCAM’s permit application. The agency is
seeking to permission to remediate oil found in the Charles River near the site, and to remediate toxic waste in the soil on the
riverbank.
The state’s plan for the oil is to cover the riverbed with a clay cap this fall, thus preventing any more oil from entering the river water,
and to vacuum-dredge the riverbed clean of all soil with oil in it in the fall of 2012.
The town would like DCAM to complete the remediation this fall, in one step rather than two.
The state’s plan for the toxic soil on the riverbank is to remove about a quarter of it, slope the bank, cover what’s left with a nonporous
sheeting, and pin that sheeting down with rip-rap, a gravellike material commonly seen under bridges.
The town would like DCAM to remove all the toxic soil — Medfield has even offered land elsewhere on the site for a modern, hygienic
toxic waste dump — and which would then allow the riverbank to be used by the public or returned to its natural state.
As a result of meeting with Medfield town officials last week, the corps is now seeking clarification of the state’s plan to remediate
both areas, Adams said.
Regarding the riverbed, the corps would like to know if DCAM intends to remove the clay cap at some point in the future, she said.
If the state intends to vacuum-dredge the riverbed next year, then the cap will certainly be removed, Adams said. But DCAM’s permit
application does not mention any work beyond capping the oil, she said.
“People can’t apply for permits piecemeal,” she said. The corps’ concern is that if the scope of all the intended work taken together
crosses a certain threshold, a more rigorous review process becomes necessary, Adams said.
Regarding the riverbank, the corps would like to know more about proposed bio-engineered solutions to keeping the toxic waste in
place, she said. At last week’s meeting, Adams made it clear that a bio-engineered solution was preferable to rip-rap because it would
have less impact on the environment.
The corps is currently talking with DCAM and MassDEP to clarify both points.
Also at the meeting was Rep. Stephen Lynch, who voiced strong support for the town’s concerns. In a Sept. 23 letter to DCAM
Commissioner Carol Cornelison, he wrote the state’s “current remediation plan is being implemented in an [sic] short-sighted,
fractional manner that will not result in a permanent solution that protects the nearby well water and the long term health of the
residents of Medfield and the surrounding communities.”
In the letter, he urged the state to withdraw its current permit application “in order to thoroughly consider all permanent
alternatives.”
Rep. Lynch writes to Massachusetts in support of Medfield’s position
Medfield —
Contact Medfield Press editor Brett M. Rhyne at 781-433-8353 or brett.rhyne@wickedlocal.com.
Copyright 2011 The Taunton Gazette. Some rights reserved

Army Corps awaits more data from DCAM

New Medfield Press editor, Brett Rhyne, writes yesterday that as the result of the Army Corps of Engineers meeting last week with the Medfield Board of Selectmen that the ACE has unanswered questions at the moment that have held up its approval of DCAM’s work in and next to the Charles River.   Mr. Rhyne also posted the letter sent by Congressman Lynch to DCAM, which asks DCAM to withdraw it permit application to work out resolution in cooperation with the town of what work should be performed.

http://www.tauntongazette.com/politicker/state/x229294101/Update-Army-Corps-of-Engineers-still-undecided-about-DCAM-permit-to-remediate-former-Medfield-State-Hospital-toxic-waste

BoS met with Army Corps. of Engineers

On 9/19/11 the Board of Selectmen met with Army Corps, of Engineers (ACE) about the pending DCAM permit to perform work in the Charles River.  The permit is being sought to do the clean up work in a way with which the town does not agree.  While DCAM is seeking to cap in place the hazardous waste dumped by the state over decades, the BoS is principally asking to have as much of the hazardous waste as possible removed and stored on site in a securely constructed containment.  All the waste cannot be removed because there is a natural gas pipeline that transects the waste, so the town suggests removing the waste up to the pipeline.  DCAM additionally proposed to cap in place diesel fuel spilled in the river when the delivery person fell asleep while filling the power plant tanks, but DEP has ordered that the oil be removed next year.  The BoS suggests it is a waste of money to cap the oil this year where it is only going to be removed next year, and the risk is low as the oil has been in the river without incident for decades.

The ACE said that for them the DCAM work is a minor project, that once they get more information about the oil removal and the bio-engineered river bank as a possible alternative to the rip rap that they only learned of last Friday that they will likely  permit the work, that the alternatives analysis of the sort the BoS hoped to see regarding the waste dump are not required, and that they thought the town’s issues should more properly be directed to the Massachusetts DEP.

The meeting materials can be seen via this link –

Click to access 20110919-meeting-with-army-core-of-engineers.pdf

BoS to meet with Army Core of Engineers re MSH

At the request of the Board of Selectmen, Mike Sullivan has scheduled a meeting between the Board of Selectmen and the Army Core of Engineers about the Core’s permit for DCAM to conduct clean up work in the Charles River.

10:00AM,  9/19/2011
Army Corp meeting at Medfield Town House

Two Appeals of ConCom’s MSH Decision

Two appeals have been taken of the Conservation Commission’s granting of an Order of Conditions (OOC) to DCAM to do the work in the Charles River and on its adjoining river bank.

The Charles River Watershed Association and The Trustees of the Reservation jointly appealed – https://medfield02052.blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/20110908-crwa-sooc-submitted-ltr9-8-11.pdf

Ten Medfield residents also appealed that Medfield Conservation Commission (ConCom) Order of Conditions (OOC) – https://medfield02052.blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/20110908-wjm-sooc-completepetitionsubmission.pdf

DEP Approved DCAM MSH Clean Up

The Massachusetts DEP yesterday approved the DCAM proposed clean up of the Medfield State Hospital C&D area that will cap the waste material, instead of remove it as the town requested.  Monitoring is required, and “additional remedial action alternatives will be required to maintain conditions of No Substantial Hazard or No Significant Risk” if problems are noted.

Link to DEP’s approval – https://medfield02052.blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/20110908-dep-2-3020799-medfield-cd-irap-approval-09-08-2011.pdf

MSH clean Up – Yesterday’s Final DCAM Report Defines the Problems and Solutions

Last night the DCAM handed out two reports (that combined were about 5″ thick documents) to the attendees at the PIP meeting at the Town House, as they presented those Phase II and Phase III reports.  These two documents are the Draft Phase II Comprehensive Site Assessment and the Draft Phase III Evaluation/Selection of Remedial Alternatives, respectively, the summary of the clean up problems at the Medfield State Hospital and the proposed solutions.  The solutions are basically a combination of the previously announced temporary fix of the C&D area, plus the newly presented solution to treating the VOC’s by pumping air into the ground to oxidize away the VOC’s – the VOC’s are thereby transformed from a liquid into a gas.

The Phase II and Phase III documents will hopefully be added to the town’s and/or the DEP’s website.  This is a link to the DCAM’s PowerPoint slides from the meeting last night – https://medfield02052.blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/20110908-dcam-powerpoint-slides-of-phase-ii-iii-reports.pdf

New Comments to DEP by CRWA and Bill Massaro

New Comments, about DCAM’s proposed clean up of the C&D area, to DEP by