The town has scheduled a meeting with Gatehouse about its 40B proposal on West Street for next week. I will attend as the representative of the Board of Selectmen. I have suggested to Mike Sullivan that he arrange to have the state approved 40B consultant, Judy Barrette sit in with the town at that meeting.
Osler ”Pete” Peterson
Medfield Select Board member
I started this blog to share the interesting and useful information that I saw while doing my job as a Medfield select board member. I thought that my fellow Medfield residents would also find that information interesting and useful as well. This blog is my effort to assist in creating a system to push the information out from the Town House to residents. Let me know if you have any thoughts on how it can be done better.
For information on my other job as an attorney (personal injury, civil litigation, estate planning and administration, and real estate), please feel free to contact me at 617-969-1500 or Osler.Peterson@OslerPeterson.com.
-
Join 689 other subscribers
Medfield
Tweets by MedfieldSearch “Medfield02052”
Archives
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
Categories
Recent Comments
Lester Cohen on Town’s Buildings Require… Select Board member… on Black Out at Budget Works… Lester Cohen on Black Out at Budget Works… The Sullivans on Thank you Linda Thompson! cherryblossomcasuall… on Roundabouts both safer & b…
Pete,
It is great that the town and developer are beginning to open a dialog, but can you elaborate at all on the format/intent of this meeting? Will this be a presentation by the developer? Will questions be answered from residents and abutters? Who will run the meeting? Etc…
Thanks for the update.
Mike Quinlan
LikeLike
Carolyn and Mike,
It is not an open public meeting, but rather a working discussion between parties whose interests have clearly intersected. I am not arranging the meeting, but I expect that the town side will include the town administrators, the town counsel, me representing the Board of Selectmen, someone from the Planning Board, and I have asked to have our 40B consultant hired and joining us. I see it as one of our information gathering opportunity, and a chance to raise any and all options that may make the project better for the town.
Pete
LikeLike
When and where is the meeting?
LikeLike
Thanks for the update. I hope it is a productive meeting and I’m confident you will update us on the result.
Mike
LikeLike
Mike and Carolyn,
I am just getting to work after the 7:30 AM selectmen meeting this morning. I learned this morning that the meeting with Gatehouse has not yet been firmed up, as I had thought. Some of the proposed meeting dates are after the 3/26 town election, so I may no longer be a selectman at the time, and even if I am re-elected, Ann will have succeed to being the chair and so she may attend that meeting instead. I asked about whether Judy Barrette had been lined up to attend as the town’s 40B consultant, and Mike said that she has not, but that he would follow up on arranging for that.
Pete
LikeLike
Hi Pete,
If and when this meeting takes place, and hopefully a public meeting to follow, I would expect that representatives of the Town will request Gatehouse to be considerate to the existing neighbors on West Street. For example, judging by pictures that were posted on the Medfield Patch it appears that there will be parking lots directly along West St facing the abutters. This presents an opportunity for considerable noise and light pollution that does not currently exist after dark. The parking areas should be toward the rear of the facility and not in the neighbors face. Additionally, there should remain a substantial landscaped barrier between the development and the abutters on West St to minimize any ill effects that will result from such a large development.
Please let us know when the public meeting allowing interaction with Gatehouse is scheduled.
Good luck with your re-election efforts.
Paul
LikeLike
Paul,
The sorts of things that you raise are all the sorts of topics that the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Medfield will address if and when any application for a comprehensive permit is filed and the ZBA holds their hearings. For example, when I sat of the ZBA hearing on the 40B project off of Dale Street at the RR tracks (I think it was called The Village at Medfield and/or the Turtle Brook Condos), I was asking for landscaping to hide and/or shield the project from the neighbors across the street, but the neighbors thought that created too much of a wall effect and did not want it, so they got what they wanted.
Those ZBA hearings will be publicized by both letters to abutters and legal notices in the Medfield Press.
It now seems that I may not be part of any private meetings with Gatehouse if they do not occur this week, as either (1) I am not re-elected on 3/26 or if I am, (2) Ann will be the chair and will attend.
Pete
LikeLike
Hi Pete,
Thank you for your comments.
I understand what you are saying however, I do not think we can compare the project on Dale St with the proposed project on West St. Turtle Brook is a set of nicely designed and laid out condominium units that are privately owned, therefore the property owners are more likely to take care of their investment. And Turtle Brook was built for individuals that are 55 yrs old or older. The impact to the neighbors and the town was minimal, if any at all.
Unlike Turtle Brook, the proposed project on West St will be rental units which in many cases you will find that the occupants of rental units do not always have the same degree of care or concern for the property that they inhabit or for property that surrounds them since they do not have an ownership investment. Additionally, the scope of the project is significantly larger than any other the town has seen. The impact on the neighbors and the town resulting from this type of development is significantly different than Turtle Brook or what was originally planned and approved for the West St. site a few years ago.
It is my hope that the residents, along with the town representatives, will have the opportunity to voice their concerns to Gatehouse directly, via the hearings organized by the ZBA. It is also my hope that the residents are not stymied at these meeting as they were at the 40B meeting held at the Middle School in February where I left the meeting with the feeling that our Town Council was working for Gatehouse and not the Town of Medfield.
Thanks for listening,
Paul Loiacono
LikeLike
Paul,Thanks for your comments. I agree with you about the differences between Turtle Brook and the Gatehouse project. I was only trying to highlight that I am betting that the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Medfield will listen to the neighbors at the hearings that will be held, just as I did when I was running that ZBA hearing on the Turtle Brook development. Best,PeteOsler L. Peterson – AttorneyPeterson | Law580 Washington Street, Newton, MA 02458-141666 North Street, PO Box 358, Medfield, MA 02052osler.peterson@oslerpeterson.comhttp://mysite.verizon.net/osler.peterson/617.969.1501direct617.969.1500 508.359.9190 m617.663.6008 f
LikeLike